Browse > Article

Quantitatively Managed Leveling for Capability Maturity Model Integration Implementation  

Kim, Hanyoung (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Inha University)
Lee, Wookey (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Inha University)
Lee, James J.H. (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Inha University)
Lee, Rich C.K. (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Inha University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Technology and Architecture / v.10, no.3, 2013 , pp. 335-346 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the overwhelming development of information technologies, the need for software development that can deal with diversified and complex business processes has increased dramatically. As a result, companies prefer softwares that can handle far more complex processing ability and also it should be stable as well as easier to maintain. These ambivalent requirements keep the software development organizations from assessing the quantitative abilities, so that under the support of the U.S. Department of Defense the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) have been developed. The CMMI upper levels for the software development companies will be evaluated to be excellent and authenticated, which drives the companies to get and maintain high levels of maturity. In this paper, a case study for a domestic software company has been exploited how to achieve CMMI level 4 and what kind of factors have been played an effective role. These issues at the domestic and international software and maintenance program, can influence the trustworthiness and marketing effects for the global market. In this paper, the company's actual case study will give clues to find out the important factors for the development and maintenance of software companies maturity levels.
Keywords
CMMI; Process Model; Staged Level; Maturity Level;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, "CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.3," 2011.
2 Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, "CMMI for Development, Version 1.3," 2010.
3 CMMI Product Team, "Maturity Profile Reports," pp. 19, 2013.
4 Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, "CMMI for Services, Version 1.3," 2011.
5 Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, "Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A Versions 1.2: Method Definition Document," 2006.
6 CMMI Product Team, "CMMI for Development Version 1.3," pp. 21-37, 65-121, 2010.
7 Goldenson, D. R. and Herbsleb, J. D., "After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success," Technical Report, CMU, SEI, 1995.
8 Herbsleb, J., Carleton, A., Rozum, J., Siegel, J. and Zubrow, D., "Benefits of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results," Technical Report, CMU, SEI, 1994.
9 J. Batista, and A. Dias de Figueiredo, "SPI in a very small team: a case with CMM," Software Process Improvement and Practice, 2000.
10 M. Staples, M. Niazi, R. Jeffery, A. Abrahams, P. Byatt, and R. Murphy, "An exploratory study of why organizations do not adopt CMMI," Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 80, I.6, pp. 883-895, 2007.   DOI
11 N. Baddoo and T. Hall, "Motivators of software process improvement: an analysis of practioners' views," The Journal of Systems and Software, 2002.
12 N. Baddoo and T. Hall, "De-motivators of software process improvement: an analysis of practitioners' views," The Journal of Systems and Software, 2003.
13 SCAMPI Upgrade Team, "Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A, Version 1.3: Method Definition Document," SEI, Tale I-10, 2011.
14 SEI, "Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) Version 1.2 : Class A Team Training," SEI, pp. 8, 2008.
15 SEI, "SCAMPI Team Training High Maturity Supplement," SEI, pp. 50, 2008.
16 Park, S. and Lee, W., "Task Assignment and Assessment based on Hierarchical Knowledge Structure as a Reference Model," Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 395- 401, 2011.
17 한혁수, "CMMI 기반의 XP 를 위한 형상 관리 프로세스 구축 지침," 인터넷정보학회논문지, 2008.
18 김성태, "CMMI 성숙도 2단계 GP와 SP 간 상호 연관성 분석 및 적용 효율성 검증," 정보과학회논문지, 2010.
19 김경환, 김흥재, 박용범, "CMMI와 PMBOK의 비교 분석을 통한 정량적 프로젝트 관리," 정보처리학회지 제 12-D 권제, 2005.
20 민재형, 이정섭, "공공분야 적용을 위한 EFQM과 BSC 통합모델 개발," ISO 9001:2000과 CMMI간의 대응 및 통합모형 연구 공공기관, 2005.