Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2021.0703

Preparation and Quality Characteristics of Different Mackerel Scomber japonicas-based Processed Products as Senior-friendly Seafoods  

Jang, Mi-Soon (Food Safety and Processing Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
Oh, Jae-Young (Food Safety and Processing Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
Kim, Poong-Ho (Food Safety and Processing Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science)
Park, Sun Young (Research Center for Industrial Development of Seafood, Gyeongsang National University)
Kim, Ye Youl (Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
Kang, Sang In (Research Center for Industrial Development of Seafood, Gyeongsang National University)
Kim, Jin-Soo (Research Center for Industrial Development of Seafood, Gyeongsang National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / v.54, no.5, 2021 , pp. 703-713 More about this Journal
Abstract
Mackerel Scomber japonicus is an excellent source of vitamins (A, D and B12), omega-3 fatty acids, dietary protein and minerals. This study was conducted to prepare mackerel-based processed seafood products such as grilled product with super-heated (GM), tang (TM) and salad with sweet potato (SSM) using mackerel as senior-friendly seafoods and to examine their quality characteristics. The hardness of GM, TM and SSM were 240.3×1.03, 21.7×1.03 and 7.4×1.03 N/m2, respectively. The viscosity of SSM was 25,450 m·Pas. The nutritional content of mackerel-processed products was within the senior-friendly standard specifications for protein, vitamin C, vitamin B2 (riboflavin) and vitamin B3 (niacin) ing GM, protein, vitamin B3 and calcium for TM, and protein, vitamin D, vitamin B2 and vitamin B3 in SSM. All the mackerel-processed products were safe as senior-friendly seafoods, since digestibility rates were 81.5% for GM, 87.9% for TM and 93.5% for SSM. The physical, nutritional and the sanitation results indicated that senior-friendly seafoods classified of the mackerel-processed products was step 1 for GM, step 2 for TM and step 3 for SSM according to the Korean Food Code and Korean Indusrty Standards.
Keywords
Grilled mackerel; Mackerel; Senior-friendly foods; Senior-friendly mackerel products;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 KDB (Korea Development Bank). 2019. Weekly KDB report. KDB report 22, 1-3.
2 Kim JS and Kang SI. 2021. Fisheries processing for practitioner. Soohak Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea.
3 Hur SJ, Lee SY and Lee SJ. 2015. Effect of biopolymer encapsulation on the digestibility of lipid and cholesterol oxidation products in beef during in vitro human digestion. Food Chem 166, 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.009.   DOI
4 KOSIS (Korea Statistical Information Service). 2020. Statistical database. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01 on Mar 31, 2021.
5 Kim JS, Kim HS and Heu MS. 2006. Introductory foods. Hyoil Publsihing Co., Seoul, Korea, 46.
6 Kim SJ and Joo NM. 2015. Development of easily chewable and swallowable pan-fried flat fish for elderly. Korean J Food Nutr 15, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2015.28.1.153.   DOI
7 KS (Korean Industrial Standards). 2019. Seniors friendly foods (KS H 4897). Retrieved from https://standard.go.kr/KSCI/standardIntro/getStandardSearchView.do?menuId=919&topMenuId=502&upperMenuId=503&ksNo=KSH4897&tmprKsNo=KS_H_NEW_2017_1067&reformNo=02 on May 10, 2021.
8 Kris-Etherton PM, Harris WS and Appel LJ. 2002. Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 106, 2747-2757. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000038493.65177.94.   DOI
9 MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety). 2020a. 2. Common standard and specification for general foods. Retrieved from http://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/foodcode/01_02.jsp?idx=5 on Mar 13, 2021.
10 MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety). 2020b. food code. chapter 8. General analytical method (salinity, mineral, vitamin A, vitamin B2, vitamin B3, vitamin C and vitamin D, dietary fiber, E. coli). Retrieved from https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/foodcode/01_01.jsp on May 15, 2021.
11 KS (Korean Industrial Standards). 2020. Seniors friendly foods (KS H 4897). Retrieved from https://standard.go.kr/KSCI/standardIntro/getStandardSearchView.do?menuId=919&topMenuId=502&upperMenuId=503&ksNo=KSH4897&tmprKsNo=KS_H_NEW_2017_1067&reformNo=02 on May 20, 2021.
12 AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2000. Official methods of analysis (17th Ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
13 AOCS (American Oil Chemists' Society). 1990. AOCS official method Ce 1b-89 (4th Ed). AOCS, Champaign, IL, U.S.A.
14 Bligh EG and Dyer WJ. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37, 911-917. https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099.   DOI
15 Kim BS, Oh BJ and Lee HI. 2020. Comparison of physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of dried mackerel treated with extracts of edible plants (green tea, lotus leaf, and pine needle). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 49, 405-411. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2020.49.4.405.   DOI
16 Kim KH. 2014. Concentration and risk assessment of heavy metal in mainly consumed fishes. M.S. Thesis, Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong, Korea.
17 Mbarki R, Sadok S and Barkallah I. 2009. Quality changes of the Mediterranean horse mackerel Trachurus mediterraneus during chilled storage: The effect of low-dose gamma irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 78, 288-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2008.12.004.   DOI
18 Ozogul Y and Balikci E. 2013. Effect of various processing methods on quality of mackerel Scomber scombrus. Food Bioproc Tech 6, 1091-1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0641-4.   DOI
19 Milenkovic B, Stajic J, Stojic N, Pucarevic M and Strbac S. 2019. Evaluation of heavy metals and radionuclides in fish and seafood products. Chemosphere 229, 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.189.   DOI
20 Park SY, Kim YJ, Kang SI, Lee JS and Kim JS. 2018. Food component characteristics of bone-softened mackerel Scomber japonicus product. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 51, 623-631. https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2018.0623.   DOI
21 Kang YM, Park SY, Lee SG, Lee JS, Heu MS and Kim JS. 2017. Chemical characterization of commercial dark-fleshed fishes as a raw material for seafood products. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 50, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2017.0130.   DOI
22 MOHW (Ministry of Health and Welfare). 2016. Dietary reference intakes for Koreans 2015. The Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea, 157-218.
23 Saglik S and Imre S. 2001. Omega 3-fatty acids in some fish species from Turkey. J Food Sci 66, 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb11318.x.   DOI
24 Yoon MS, Kim HJ, Park KH, Park JY, Lee JS, Jeon YJ, Son HJ, Heu MS and Kim JS. 2009. Food quality characterizations of commercial salted mackerel. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 42, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2009.42.2.123.   DOI
25 Boo KW, Kim BG and Lee SJ. 2020. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of enzymatically treated and texture modified elderly foods. Korean J Food Sci Technol 52, 495-502. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2020.52.5.495.   DOI
26 Heu MS, Lee TS, Kim HS, Jee SJ, Lee JH, Kim HJ, Yoon MS, Park SH and Kim JS. 2008. Food component characteristics of tang from conger eel by-products. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37, 477-484. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.4.477.   DOI