Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2011.0671

Effect of Light Intensity on Survival, Growth and Productivity of the Cyclopoid Copepod Paracyclopina nana: A Laboratory Study  

Lee, Kyun-Woo (South Sea Environment Research Department, South Sea Branch, KORDI)
Kang, Jung-Hoon (South Sea Environment Research Department, South Sea Branch, KORDI)
Park, Heum-Gi (Faculty of Marine Bioscience and Technology, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / v.44, no.6, 2011 , pp. 671-676 More about this Journal
Abstract
To determine the optimum light intensity for mass culture of the brackish-water cyclopoid copepod Paracyclopina nana, survival, growth, and productivity of the copepod were examined at several light intensities (0, 10, 100, 500, 1,000 lx). The survival rate of P. nana from nauplius to adult decreased with increasing light intensity. The highest survival rate was found under the dark condition, with 61.7% surviving; no significant difference was observed between 0 and 10 lx (51.7%) and the lowest survival rate was with 100 lx (26.7%). Survival rates at 500 and 1,000 lx were significantly lower in comparison with other conditions. The developmental period from nauplius to copepodid (5.8 days) and to adult (11.8 days) at 10 lx was significantly shorter than in the other treatments. Daily mean nauplius production of adult females over 7 days at 0, 10 and 100 lx was significantly higher than at 500 and 1,000 lx. In the 1,000 lx treatment, 99% of the adult females died on the $14^{th}$ day. The optimum light intensity for the mass culture of P. nana could be 10 lx, which had no adverse effects on survival, development, or reproduction.
Keywords
Copepod; Paracyclopina nana; Light intensity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Camus T and Zeng CS. 2008. Effects of photoperiod on egg production and hatching success, naupliar and copepodite development, adult sex ratio and life expectancy of the tropical calanoid copepod Acartia sinjiensis. Aquaculture 280, 220-226.   DOI
2 Chang WB and Lei CH. 1993. Development and energy content of a brackish-water copepod, Apocyclops royi (Lindberg) reared in a laboratory. Bull Inst Zool Acad Sinica 32, 62-81.
3 Davis CS. 1983. Laboratory rearing of marine calanoid copepods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 71, 119-133.   DOI
4 Dieguez M. and Gilbert JJ. 2003. Predation by Buenoa macrotibialis (Insecta, Hemiptera) on zooplankton: effect of light on selection and consumption of prey. J Plankton Res 25, 759-769.   DOI
5 Rhodes ACE. 2007. Dietary effects on carotenoid composition in the marine harpacticoid copepod Nitokra lacustris. J Plankton Res 29, i73-i83.   DOI
6 Ruivo M, Cartaxana P and Amorim A. 2011. Effects of growth phase and irradiance on phytoplankton pigment ratios: implications for chemotaxonomy in coastal waters. J Plankton Res 33, 1012-1022.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Saito H and Taguchi S. 2003. Influence of UVB radiation on hatching success of marine copepod Paracalanus parvus s. l. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 282, 135-147.   DOI
8 Schipp GR, Bosmans JMP and Marshall AJ. 1999. A method for hatchery culture of tropical calanoid copepod, Acartia spp. Aquaculture 174, 81-88.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Stottrup JG and Norsker NH. 1997. Production and use of copepods in marine fish larviculture. Aquaculture 155, 231-247.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Stottrup JG, Richardson K, Kirkegaard E and Pihl NJ. 1986. The cultivation of Acartia tonsa Dana for use as a live food source for marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 52, 87-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Sun B and Fleeger JW. 1995. Sustained mass culture of Amphiascoides atopus a marine harpacticoid copepod in a recirculating system. Aquaculture 136, 313-321.   DOI
12 Zillioux EJ. 1969. A continuous recirculating culture system for planktonic copepods. Mar Biol 4, 215-218.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Matsudaira C. 1957. Culturing of a Copepoda, Sinocalanus tenellus. Inform. Bull Planktol Japan 5, 1-6.
14 Lee KW, Park HG, Lee SM and Kang HK (2006) Effects of diets on the growth of the brackish water cyclopoid copepod Paracyclopina nana Smirnov. Aquaculture 256, 346-353.   DOI
15 Li CL, Luo XX, Huang XH and Gu BH. 2008. Effects of temperature, salinity, pH, and light on filtering and grazing rates of a calanoid copepod (Schmackeria dubia ). TheScientificWorldjo 8, 1219-1227.   DOI
16 Lipman EE, Kao KR and Phelps RP. 2001. Abstract, Aquaculture 2001 1-379.
17 Mullin MM and Brooks ER. 1967. Laboratory culture, growth rate, and feeding behavior of a planktonic marine copepod. Limnol Oceanogr 12, 657-666.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Naganuma T, Inoue T. and Uye S. 1997. Photoreactivation of UV-induced damage to embryos of a planktonic copepod. J Plankton Res 19, 783-787.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ohno A and Okamura Y. 1988. Propagation of the calanoid copepod, Acartia tsuensis, in outdoor tanks. Aquaculture 70, 39-51.   DOI
20 Ohno A, Takahashi T and Taki Y. 1990. Dynamics of exploited populations of the calanoid copepod, Acartia tsuensis. Aquaculture 84, 27-39.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Park HG and Hur SB. 1993. Optimum culture environment of the benthic copepod, Tigriopus japonicus. J Aquaculture 6, 147-157.
22 Dussart BH and Defaye D. 2001. Introduction to the copepoda. In: Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World. Dumont HJF., ed. Backhuys, Leiden, Holland, 1-344.
23 Payne MF and Rippingale RJ. 2001. Intensive cultivation of the calanoid copepod Gladioferens imparipes. Aquaculture 201, 329-342.   DOI
24 Person-Le Ruyet J. 1975. Elevage de copepods calanoids. Biologie et dynamique des populations: premires resultats. Ann Inst Oceanogr 51, 203-221.
25 Peterson WT and Painting SJ. 1990. Developmental rates of the copepods Calanus australis and Calanoides carinatus in the laboratory, with discussion of methods used for calculation of development time. J Plankton Res 12, 283-293.   DOI
26 Halcrow K. 1963. Acclimation to temperature in the marine copepod, Calanus finmarchicus (Gunner). Limnol Oceanogr 8, 1-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Hayward TL. 1980. Spatial and temporal feeding patterns of copepods from the North Pacific centra gyre. Mar Biol 58, 295-309.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Head EJH, Harrisl LR and Debs CA. 1985. Effect of daylength and food concentration on in situ diurnal feeding rhythms in Arctic copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24, 281-288.   DOI
29 Jacobs, J. 1961. Laboratory cultivation of the marine copepod Pseudodiaptomus coronatus WILLIAMS. Limnol Oceanogr 6, 443-446.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Kouwenberg JHM, Browman HI, Runge JA, Cullen JJ, Davis RF and St-Pierre JF. 1999. Biological weighting of ultraviolet (280-400 nm) induced mortality in marine zooplankton and fish. II. Calanus finmarchicus (Copepoda) eggs. Mar Biol 134, 285-293.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Kwon ON, Lee KW, Kim GU and Park HG. 2008. Digestive enzymatic and nucleic acidic responses of olive flounder Paralichthys oilivaceus larvae fed cyclopoid copepod Paracyclopina nana. J Aquaculture 21, 190-195.
32 Ban S. 1992. Effects of photoperiod, temperature, and population density on induction of diapause egg-production in Eurytemora affinis (Copepoda, Calanoida) in lake Ohnuma, Hokkaido, Japan. J Crustacean Biol 12, 361-367.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Lacuna DG and Uye SI. 2000. Effect of UVB radiation on the survival, feeding, and egg production of the brackishwater copepod, Sinocalanus tenellus, with notes on photoreactivation. Hydrobiologia 434, 73-79.   DOI
34 Lacuna DG and Uye SI. 2001. Influence of mid-ultraviolet (UVB) radiation on the physiology of the marine planktonic copepod Acartia omorii and the potential role of photoreactivation. J Plankton Res 23, 143-155.   DOI
35 Landry MR. 1983. The development of marine calanoid copepods with comment on the isochronal rule. Limnol Oceanogr 28, 614-624.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Borghini F, Colacevich A, Bergamino N, Micarelli P, Dattilo AM, Focardi S, Focardi S and Loiselle SA. 2009. The microalgae Tetraselmis suecica in mesocosms under different light regimes. Chem Ecol 25, 345-357.   DOI
37 Boyd CM, Smith SL and Cowles TJ. 1980. Grazing patterns of copepods in the upwelling system off Peru. Limnol Oceanogr 25, 583-596.   DOI   ScienceOn