Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2011.0403

A Hydroacoustic Survey Analyzing Fish Populations and Their Distribution Upstream and Downstream of Changzhou Dam, China, Based on Spillway Conditions  

Tan, Xichang (Pearl River Fishery Research Institute, Chinese Academic of Fishery Science)
Kang, Myoung-Hee (Myriax Software Pty Ltd.)
Tao, Jiangping (Institute of Hydroecology, Ministry of Water Resources & Chinese Academy of Science)
Li, Xinhui (Pearl River Fishery Research Institute, Chinese Academic of Fishery Science)
Huang, Daoming (Myriax Software Pty Ltd.)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / v.44, no.4, 2011 , pp. 403-412 More about this Journal
Abstract
Hydroacoustic surveys were performed to clarify the density and spatial distribution of fish upstream and downstream of Changzhou Dam in the Pearl River, China, with regard to the condition of the spillways. Fish were densely distributed in the forebay of the upstream dam and the average fish density was 0.22 individuals/$m^3$ under open spillways on 24 June 2010, but when the spillways were closed on 25 June 2010, the fish in the upstream dam dispersed and the average fish density decreased to 0.007 individuals/$m^3$. Meanwhile, the average fish density in the downstream region was 0.28 individuals/$m^3$ before the spillway was opened on 24 May 2010, but it decreased to 0.08 individuals/$m^3$ on 26 June, just after the spillway was closed. The vertical distribution of fish upstream of the dam was not consistent. The target strength (TS) of fish upstream of the dam was larger than that of fish in the downstream region, although the distribution of TS was similar between the upstream and downstream regions. Therefore, we concluded that while numerous fish could swim to the upstream region while the spillways were open, closed spillways obstructed fish migrating upward from the downstream region.
Keywords
Acoustic; Fish population; Fish spatial distribution; Dam;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Simmonds EJ and Maclennan DN. 2005. Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice. 2nd edn. Blackwell Science Press, Oxford, U.K., 1-437.
2 Soule M, Barange M, Solli H and Hampton I. 1997. Performance of a new phase algorithm for discriminating between single and overlapping echoes in a split-beam echo sounder. ICES J Mar Sci 54, 934-938.   DOI
3 Steig TW and Iverson TK. 1998. Acoustic monitoring of salmonid density, target strength, and trajectories at two dams on the Columbia River, using a split-beam scanning system. Fish Res 35, 43-53.   DOI
4 Tan XC, Chang JB, Tao JP and Li XH. 2008. Survey on fish distribution in the forequarter of the three gorge reservoir using EY60 split-beam echosounder. Chinese J Ecological Sci 27, 329-334.
5 Tan XC, Li XH and Chang JB. 2009. Observation of the Spawning Aggregation of Megalobrama hoffmanni in the Pearl River. J Fresh Ecology 24, 293-299.   DOI
6 Tao JP, Gao Y and Qao Y. 2010. Hydroacoustic observation of fish behavior and spatial patterns in the ship lock and adjacent areas of the Gezhouba Dam, Yangtze River. Acta Ecologica Sinica 30, 233-239.   DOI
7 Tao JP, Qiao Y and Tan XC. 2009. Species identification of Chinese sturgeon using acoustic descriptors and ascertaining their spatial distribution in the spawning ground of Gezhouba Dam. Chinese Sci Bull 54, 3972-3980.   DOI
8 Thorne RE and Johnson GE. 1993. A review of hydroacoustic studies for estimation of salmon downriver migration past hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia and Snake Rivers in the 1980s. Rev Fish Sci 1, 27-56.   DOI
9 Wu Zhou Channel Authority. 2011. Water level data at the Changzhou dam. http://wzhd.gxgh.cn on March 9.
10 Coetzee J. 2000. Use of a shoal analysis and patch estimation system(SHAPES) to characterise sardine schools. Aquat Living resour 13, 1-10.   DOI
11 Djemali I, Toujani R and Guillard J. 2008. Hydroacoustic fish biomass assessment in man-made lakes in Tunisia: Horizontal beaming importance and diel effect. Aquat Ecology 43, 1121-1131.
12 Frouzova J, Kubecka J, Balk H and Frouz J. 2005. Target strength of European freshwater fish and its dependence on fish body parameters. Fish Res 75, 86-96.   DOI
13 Henderson MJ and Horne JK, 2007. Comparison of in situ, ex situ, and backscatter model estimates of Pacific hake(Merluccius productus) target strength. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64, 1781-1794.   DOI
14 Kang M, Furusawa M and Miyashita K 2002. Effective and accurate use of difference in mean volume backscattering strength to identify fish and plankton. ICES J Mar Sci 59, 794-804.   DOI
15 Kang M, Honda S and Oshima T 2006. Age characteristics of walleye pollock school echoes. ICES J Mar Sci 63, 1465-1476.   DOI
16 Kubecka J and Wittingerova M. 2003. Horizontal beaming as a crucial component of acoustic fish stock assessment in freshwater reservoirs. Aquat Living resour 16, 325-331.   DOI
17 Lawson GL, Barange M and Freon P. 2001. Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information. ICES J Mar Sci 58, 275-287.   DOI
18 Myriax. 2010. Help file 4.90.33 for Echoview. http://support.echoview.com/WebHelp/Echoview.htm on March 9.
19 Li YF, Li XH and Tan XC. 2008. Fisheries resources of the Zhaoqing section the Pearl River. Chinese J Reservoir fishery 28, 80-83.
20 Love RH. 1977. Target strength of a fish at any aspect. J Acoust Soc Am 1397-1403.
21 Chen DQ, Zhang X and Tan XC. 2009. Hydroacoutic study of spatial and temporal distribution of Gymnocypris prezewalskii in QinghaiLake, China Environ Biol Fish 84, 231-239.   DOI
22 Aglen A. 1983. Random errors of acoustic fish abundance estimates in relation to the survey grid density applied. FAO Fish Rep 300, 293-298.
23 Blackman SS. 1986. Multiple-target tracking with radar applications, Artech House Press, Dedham, U.S.A., 1-464.