Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2002.35.1.097

Production and Characteristics of Protein Hydrolysate from Sharp Toothed Eel (Muraenesox cinereus)  

Cho Hye Young (Department of food science and nutrition, Yosu national university)
Ahn Chang Bum (Department of food science and nutrition, Yosu national university)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences / v.35, no.1, 2002 , pp. 97-104 More about this Journal
Abstract
Protein hydrolysate was prepared as a natural flavor stock from the sharp toothed eel (Muraenesox cinereus) mince using com-mercially available proteolytic enzymes, Alcalase, Neutrase, Protamex, and Flavourzyme. A 6 hr hydrolysis of mince, to which water of the equal weight of the mince was added, with $2\%$ (w/w, protein weight) Elavourzyme at $50^{\circ}$ yielded a hydrolysate of the highest acceptability. Removing the access lipid in liquified hydrolysate (not dehydrated) after enzyme hydrolysis, five times repetitive extraction using n-hexane (liquified hydrolysate : n-hexane=4 : 1, v/v) was effective, resulting in less than $1\%$ lipid content of the dehydrated-hydrolysate. The amino acid composition of the hydrolysate (prepared with Flavourzyme) was similar to that of the starting material. Hydrolysis led to an increase in concentration of not only total free amino acid but also free amino acid such as serine, glutamic acid, alanine, and methionine responsible for umami taste, especially up to about 40 times for methionine. Major free amino acids in amount were leucine, phenylalanine, valine, alanine, and isoleucine and they comprised about half of the total free amino acids, Moisture adsorption, fat adsorption, emulsifying capacity, and foaming capacity of the hydrolysate were 870.1 $\pm$ $7.9\%$, 352.0$\pm$ $5.3\%$, 50.3 $\pm$ $1.2\%$, and $87.5\pm$ $2.5\%$, respectively, and solubility was 83$\~$$84\%$ at acid pH range of 2$\~$4.
Keywords
Sharp toothed eel; Mince; Enzyme hydrolysate; Flavor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 李應昊. 1985. 水産加工學, 先進文化社, pp. 287-332
2 Mohr, V. 1977. Fish protein concentrate production by enzyme hydrolysis. In Biochemical Aspects of New Protein Food, ed. J. Alder-Nissen, B.O. Eggum, L. Munck & H.S. Olsen, FEBS Federation Biochemical Societies, 11th Meeting, Copenhagen, Vol. 44, pp. 53-62
3 Pedersen, B. 1994. Removing bitterness from protein hydrolysates. Food Technol., 48, 96-98, 76
4 Pommer, K. 1995. New proteolytic enzymes for the production of savory ingredients. Cereal Foods World, 40, 745-748
5 Rebeca, B., M.T. Pena-Vera and Diaz-Castaneda. 1991. Production of fish protein hydrolysates with bacterial proteases; yield and nutritional value. J. Food Sci., 56, 309-314   DOI
6 Sathe, S.K. and D.K. Salunkhe. 1981. Functional properties of the great Notthern bean proteins : Emulsion, foaming, viscosity and gelatin properties. J. Food Sci., 46, 71-75   DOI
7 Shahidi, F., M. Naczk, R.B. Pegg and J. Synowiecki. 1991. Chemical composition and nutritional value of processing discards of cod (Gauds morhus). Food Chem., 42, 145-151   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Shahidi, F., X.Q. Han and J. Synowiecki. 1995. Production and characteristics of protein hydorlysates from capelin (Mallotus villosus). Food Chem., 53, 285-293   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2'nd ed. McGraw-Hill Co. New York
10 Surowka, K. and M. Fik. 1994. Studies on the recovery of proteinaceous substances from chicken head: II-Application of pepsin to the production of protein hydrolysate. J. Sci. Food Agric., 65, 289-296   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Wang, J.C. and J.E. Kinsella. 1976. Functional properties of novel protein: Alfalfa leaf protein. J. Food Sci., 41, 286-292   DOI
12 Clegg, K.M. 1973. Improvements in or relating to the production of pre-digested forms of protein. British Patent 1,338,936
13 Kilara, A. 1985. A enzyme-modified protein food ingredients, Process Biochem., 20, 149-158
14 Dambergs, N. 1959. Extractives of fish muscle. 2. Sovlent-water ratio in extraction of fat and water solubles. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 16, 63-71   DOI
15 Fuke, S. 1994. Taste active components of seafoods with special reference to umami substances. In Seafoods: Chemistry, Processing Technology and Quality; Shaihidi, F., Botta, J.R., Eds; Blackie Academic & Professional: London, U.K.; Chapter 8
16 Gillet, M. 1985. Flavor effects of sodium chloride. Food Technol., 39, 47-52, 56
17 Kim, Y.U., Y.M. Kim and Y.S. Kim. 1994. Commercial fishes of the costal and offshore water in Korea. National fisheries research and development agency (South Korea), p. 51 (in Korean)
18 Lee, Y.B., J.G. Elliot, D.A. Rickansrud and E.C. Mugberg. 1978a. Predicting protein efficiency ratio by the chemical determinations of connective tissue content in meat. J. Food Sci., 43, 1359-1362   DOI
19 Lee, E.H., Y.H. Park, J.H. Pyeun, S.K. Kim, S.T. Yang and Y.O. Song. 1978b. Studies on the processing and utilization of sardine protein concentrate. Bull. Korean Fish. Soc., 11, 25-27 (in Korean)
20 Lin, M.J.Y., E.S. Humbert and F.W. Sosulki. 1974. Certain function properties of sunflower meals. J. Food Sci., 39, 368-371   DOI
21 Mackie, I.M. 1982. General review of fish protein hydrolysates. Animal Feed Sci. Techonol., 7, 113-124   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Chobert, J.M., B.H. Catherine and M.G. Nicolas. 1998. Solubility and emulsifying properties of caseins and whey proteins modified enzymatically by trypsin. J. Agric. Food Chem., 36, 883-889   DOI
23 Alsmeyer, R.H., A.E. Cunningham and M.L. Happich. 1974. Equations predicting PER from amino acid analysis. Food Technol., 28, 34-40
24 AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA