Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5734/JGM.2011.8.1.28

Clinical Trials and Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests  

Lee, You-Kyoung (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine)
Lee, Sang-Moo (National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency)
Publication Information
Journal of Genetic Medicine / v.8, no.1, 2011 , pp. 28-34 More about this Journal
Abstract
Most clinicians understand clinical trials as the evaluation process for new medicine before their use. However, clinical trials can also be applied to laboratory diagnostic tests (LDTs) to verify diagnostic accuracy and efficacy before their clinical laboratory implementation for patients. The clinical trial of LDT has two distinctive characteristics that are different from the case of pharmaceuticals and thus worth special consideration. One of them is the level of evidence. The well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are known to provide the best evidence to prove the clinical efficacy of any pharmaceutical products. However, RCTs lose practicality when applied to LDTs due to various issues including ethical complications. For this reason, comparative study format is considered more feasible approach for LDTs. In addition pharmaceuticals and LDTs are different in that the user's intervention is not required for the former but critical to the latter. Moreover, in the case of pharmaceuticals, end-products are produced by manufacturers before being used by clinicians. However, in LDTs, once reagents and instruments are provided by manufacturers, they are first utilized by clinical laboratories to produce test results in order for clinicians to use them later. In other words, when it comes to LDTs, clinical laboratories play the role of manufacturers, providing reliable test results with improved quality assurance. Considering the distinctive characteristics of LDTs, we would like to offer detailed suggestions to successfully perform clinical trials in LDTs, which include analytical performance measures, clinical test performance measures, diagnostic test accuracy measures, clinical effectiveness measures, and post-implementation surveillance.
Keywords
Clinical trial; Diagnostic test; Laboratory diagnostic test; Diagnostic test accuracy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sackett D, Haynes R. The architecture of diagnostic research. In: Knottnerus J, ed. The evidence base of clinical diagnosis, London, BMJ, 2002
2 Gluud C, Gluud LL. Evidence based diagnostics. BMJ 2005;330:724-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Guyatt G, Rennie D. Users' guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago: AMA Press, 2002.
4 Meads CA, Davenport CF. Quality assessment of diagnostic before-after studies: development of methodology in the context of a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:3.   DOI
5 Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem 2003;49:1-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:W1-12.   DOI
7 McQueen M. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Biochem 2003;36:1-2.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Bossuyt PM. The quality of reporting in diagnostic test research: getting better, still not optimal. Clin Chem 2004;50:465-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Fischer JE, Bachmann LM, Jaeschke R. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1043-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Leeflang MM, Bossuyt PM, Irwig L. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:5-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Vandenbroucke JP, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM. Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem 2005;51:1335-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Pai M, Flores LL, Pai N, Hubbard A, Riley LW, Colford JM, Jr. Diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2003;3:633-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Lee YK. Consideration of ELSI for Genetic Testing. Kor J Int Med 2010;79:S106-8.
14 Reitsma JB, Rutjes AW, Khan KS, Coomarasamy A, Bossuyt PM. A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:797-806.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Bandolier Extra. Evidence and Diagnostics. http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/diagnos/Diagessy.html. Accessed Jun 3, 2011.
16 Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed Jun 3, 2011.
17 Deeks J. Assessing outcomes following tests. In evidence based laboratory medicine. In Price CP, Christenson RH, eds., Washington DC, AACC Press, 2007.
18 FDA. Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: In Vitro Diagnostic 2009 H1N1 Tests for Use in the 2009 H1N1 Emergency. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM188679.pdf. Accessed Jun 3, 2011
19 Philbrick JT, Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR, Langou RA, Chandler JP. The limited spectrum of patients studied in exercise test research. Analyzing the tip of the iceberg. JAMA 1982;248:2467-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978;299:926-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:189-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001;323:334-6.