Validation of QF-PCR for Rapid Prenatal Diagnosis of Common Chromosomal Aneuploidies in Korea |
Han, Sung-Hee
(Division of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul Clinical Laboratories)
Ryu, Jae-Song (Division of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul Clinical Laboratories) An, Jeong-Wook (Division of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul Clinical Laboratories) Park, Ok-Kyoung (Division of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul Clinical Laboratories) Yoon, Hye-Ryoung (Division of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul Clinical Laboratories) Yang, Young-Ho (Division of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul Clinical Laboratories) Lee, Kyoung-Ryul (Division of Molecular Genetics and Cytogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul Clinical Laboratories) |
1 | Stojilkovic-Mikic T, Mann K, Docherty Z, Mackie Ogilvie C. Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping. Prenat Diagn 2005;25:79-83. DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Marongiu A, Canadas P, Ordonez E, Lloveras E, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis by QF-PCR: evaluation of 30,000 consecutive clinical samples and future applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1075:288-98. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Mansfield ES. Diagnosis of Down syndrome and other aneuploidies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and small tandem repeat polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2:43-50. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Thein AT, Abdel-Fattah SA, Kyle PM, Soothill PW. An assessment of the use of interphase FISH with chromosome specific probes as an alternative to cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2000;20: 275-80. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Mann K, Donaghue C, Fox SP, Docherty Z, Ogilvie CM. Strategies for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet 2004;12: 907-15. DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Cho EH, Park BY, Kang YS, Lee EH. Validation of QF-PCR in a Korean population. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29:213-6. DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Levett LJ, Liddle S, Meredith R. A large-scale evaluation of amnio-PCR for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17: 115-8. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Donaghue C, Roberts A, Mann K, Ogilvie CM. Development and targeted application of a rapid QF-PCR test for sex chromosome imbalance. Prenat Diagn 2003; 23:201-10. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Cirigliano V, Ejarque M, Fuster C, Adinolfi M. X chromosome dosage by quantitative fluorescent PCR and rapid prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 2002;8:1042-5. DOI |
10 | Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Canadas MP, Marongiu A, Ejarque M, Ordonez E, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR. Assessment on 18,000 consecutive clinical samples. Mol Hum Reprod 2004;10:839-46. DOI |
11 | Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Adinolfi M. Non-invasive screening and rapid QF-PCR assay can greatly reduce the need for conventional cytogenetic analyses in pre natal diagnosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;11:671-3. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Evans MI, Henry GP, Miller WA, Bui TH, Snidjers RJ, Wapner RJ, et al. International, collaborative assessment of 146,000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1213-6. DOI |
13 | Mann K, Fox SP, Abbs SJ, Yau SC, Scriven PN, Docherty Z, et al. Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 2001;358:1057-61. DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN, Lese CM, Rita D, Wyandt H, et al. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:293-301. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:e57. DOI |
16 | Hochstenbach R, Meijer J, van de Brug J, Vossebeld-Hoff I, Jansen R, van der Luijt RB, et al. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Prenat Diagn 2005;25:1032-9. DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Schmidt W, Jenderny J, Hecher K, Hackeloer BJ, Kerber S, Kochhan L, et al. Detection of aneuploidy in chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 by QF-PCR in 662 selected pregnancies at risk. Mol Hum Reprod 2000;6:855-60. DOI |
18 | Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Ordonez E, Marongiu A, Paz Canadas M, Ejarque M, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR, results of 9 years of clinical experience. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:40-9. DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Lee MH, Kim DJ, Yang JH, Cho YH, Park SY, Ryu HM. A large-scale validation for QF-PCR aneuploidy testing in Korean. Korean J Genet 2008;30:35-8. |
20 | Sacchetti L, Calcagno G, Coto I, Tinto N, Vuttariello E, Salvatore F. Efficiency of two different nine-loci short tandem repeat systems for DNA typing purposes. Clin Chem 1999;45:178-83. |
21 | Quaife R, Wong LF, Tan SY, Chua WY, Lim SS, Hammersley CJ, et al. QF-PCR-based prenatal detection of aneuploidy in a southeast Asian population. Prenat Diagn 2004;24:407-13. DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Han SH, An JW, Jeong GY, Yoon HR, Lee A, Yang YH, et al. Clinical and Cytogenetic Findings on 31,615 Mid-trimester Amniocenteses. Korean J Lab Med 2008;28:378-85. DOI |
23 | Cirigliano V, Ejarque M, Canadas MP, Lloveras E, Plaja A, Perez MM, et al. Clinical application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for the rapid prenatal detection of common chromosome aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 2001;7: 1001-6. DOI |
24 | Kozlowski P, Grund I, Hickmann G, Stressig R, Knippel AJ. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction versus cytogenetics: risk-related indication and clinical implication of nondetected chromosomal disorders. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006;21:217-23. DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Pertl B, Pieber D, Lercher-Hartlieb A, Orescovic I, Haeusler M, Winter R, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy by quantitative fluorescent PCR on fetal samples from mothers at high risk for chromosome disorders. Mol Hum Reprod 1999;5:1176-9. DOI |
26 | Hult n MA, Dhanjal S, Pertle B. Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCR. Reproduction 2003;126: 279-97. DOI ScienceOn |
27 | Nicolini U, Lalatta F, Natacci F, Curcio C, Bui TH. The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:541-8. DOI ScienceOn |