Browse > Article

Establishment of Affective Achievement Criteria and Investigation of 8th Grade Students' Affective Characteristics in Mathematics  

Kim, Sun-Hee (Department of Mathematics Education, Silla University)
Publication Information
Journal for History of Mathematics / v.24, no.3, 2011 , pp. 145-163 More about this Journal
This study sets the cut points of affective achievement scores based on the criteria referenced assessment. The modified Angoff method is applied to the standardized mathematics affect inventory which had validity and reliability. The cut points are set for 6 factors i.e. learning directivity, self control, anxiety, interest, cognizing value and confidence. As the results, among percentages of factor that middle school 2nd grade students in Korea achieved, the proportion of cognizing value is the highest. And there are no difference of the proportions as for gender, differentiated instruction, and region.
정의적 성취;학습지향성;자기조절;불안;흥미;가치 인식;자신감;기준 점수;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Zieky, M. J. (2001). "So much has changed: how the setting of cutscores has evolved since the 1980s." In Cizek, G.J. (Ed.), Setting Performance Standards, pp.19-52. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2 Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P.(2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings From IEA's Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade. MA: Boston College.
3 Op't Eynde, P., De Corte, E. & Verschaffel, L. (2006). "Accepting emotional complexity: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom." Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 193-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Malmivuori, M. L. (2004). "A dynamic viewpoint: affect in the functioning of self-system processes." PME 28th Conference, vol.1, 114-118.
5 Malmivuori, M. L. (2006). "Affect and self-regulation." Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 149-164.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 DeBellis, V. & Goldin, G. (2006). "Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: a representational perspective." Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 131-147.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 McLeod, D. B. (1992). "Research on affect in mathematics education: a reconceptualization." In D. A. Gouwes(ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Macmillan, NY, pp.575-596.
8 이종희, 김선희, 김부미, 김기연, 김수진, 윤수철, 김윤민 (2011). 수학 학습에 대한 정의적 성취 검사 도구 개발 및 검증. 수학교육, 50(2), 247-261.
9 정구향, 조영미, 이대현, 이봉주 (2004). 2003년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구 -수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2004-1-4.
10 Hannula, M. (2004). "Introduction." PME 28th Conference, vol.1, 107-109.
11 김명화 (2010). 수학에 대한 정의적 특성의 개념과 구성 요소. 수학에 대한 정의적 특성 개선 방안 탐색 세미나. 한국교육과정평가원 연구자료 ORM 2010-58 (p. 3-20).
12 Lee, W. C. (2007). "Multinomial and Compound Multinomial Error Models for Tests With Complex Item Scoring." Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 255-274.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 박 정, 김경희, 김수진, 손원숙, 송미영, 조지민 (2006). 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 -기술보고서-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRO 2006-4.
14 이미경, 곽영순, 민경석, 채선희, 최성연, 최미숙, 나귀수 (2004). PISA 2003 결과 분석 연구 -수학적 소양, 읽기 소양, 과학적 소양 수준 및 배경변인 분석-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2004-2-1.
15 이종희, 김선희 (2010). 중. 고등학교 학생들의 수학 정의적 성취의 차이 분석. 교과교육학연구, 14(4), 1-28.
16 교육과학기술부 (2008). 중학교 교육과정 해설 III - 수학, 과학, 기술. 가정.
17 교육인적자원부 (2007). 수학과 교육과정. 대한 교과서 주식회사.