Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14191/Atmos.2018.28.4.357

Bias Correction for Aircraft Temperature Observation Part I: Analysis of Temperature Bias Characteristics by Comparison with Sonde Observation  

Kwon, Hui-nae (Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS))
Kang, Jeon-ho (Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS))
Kwon, In-Hyuk (Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS))
Publication Information
Atmosphere / v.28, no.4, 2018 , pp. 357-367 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the temperature bias of aircraft observation was estimated through comparison with sonde observation prior to developing the temperature bias correction method at the Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS). First, we tried to compare aircraft temperature with collocated sonde observations at 0000 UTC on June 22, 2012. However, it was difficult to estimate the temperature bias due to the lack of samples and the uncertainty of the sonde position at high altitudes. Second, we attempted a background innovation comparison for sonde and aircraft using KIAPS Package for Observation Processing (KPOP). The one month averaged background innovation shows the aircraft temperature have a warm bias against sonde for all levels. In particular, there is a globally distinct warm bias about 0.4 K between 200 hPa and 300 hPa corresponding to flight level. Spatially, most of the areas showed the warm bias except for below 300 hPa in some part of China at 0000 and 1200 UTC and below 850 hPa in Australia at 0000 UTC. In general, the temperature bias was larger at 1200 UTC than 0000 UTC. Based on the estimated temperature bias, we have applied the static bias correction method to the aircraft temperature observation. As a result, the warm bias of the aircraft temperature has decreased at most levels, but a slight cold bias has occurred in some areas.
Keywords
Aircraft; temperature; warm bias; bias correction; background innovation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ballish, B. and V. K. Kumar, 2006: Comparision of aircraft and radiosonde temperature biases at NCEP. Preprints, 10th Symp. On Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for the Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface (IOAS-AOLS), Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 3.5 [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/103076.pdf].
2 Benjamin, S. G., B. E. Schwartz, and R. E. Cole, 1999: Accuracy of ACARS wind and temperature observations determined by collocation. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 1032-1038.   DOI
3 Buehner, M., and Coauthors, 2015: Implementation of deterministic weather forecasting systems based on Ensemble-Variational data assimilation at Environment Canada. Part I: The global system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2532-2559, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-14-00354.1.   DOI
4 Cardinali, C., L. Isaksen, and E. Andersson, 2003: Use and impact of automated aircraft data in a global 4DVAR data assimilation system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1865-1877.   DOI
5 Collins, W. G., 1999: Determination of new adjustment tables in order to bring radiosonde temperature and height measurements from different sonde types into relative agreement. EMC/NCEP/NOAA [Available online at http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/papers/collins/new_tables/new_tables.html].
6 Ha, J.-H., I.-H. Kwon, J.-H. Kwon, J.-H. Kang, and H.-W. Chun, 2015: Use and impact of sonde, aircraft and satellite observations in the KIM-3DVAR system. Proceedings, The spring meeting of the Korean Meteorological Society, Seoul, Korea, KMS, 151-152 (in Korean).
7 Hong, S.-Y., and Coauthors, 2018: The Korean Integrated Model (KIM) system for global weather forecasting. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 267-292, doi:10.1007/s13143-018-0028-9.   DOI
8 Kang, J.-H., and Coauthors, 2018: Development of an observation processing package for data assimilation in KIAPS. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 303-318, doi:10.1007/s13143-018-0030-2.   DOI
9 Painting, D. J., 2003: AMDAR reference manual. WMO, 84 pp [Available online at https://library.wmo.int/pmb_ged/wmo_958_en.pdf].
10 Park, O.-R., and Y.-S. Kim, 2002: A study on the verification and sensitivity test for the ACARS data. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 38, 333-342.
11 Petersen, R. A., 2016: On the impact and benefits of AMDAR observations in operational forecasting-Part I: A review of the impact of automated aircraft wind and temperature reports. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 97, 585-602, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00055.1.   DOI
12 WMO, 2017: Guide to Aircraft-based Observations. World Meteorological Organization, 1200, 132 pp.
13 Sako, H., 2010: Assimilation of Aircraft Temperature Data in the JMA Global 4D-Var Data Assimilation System. In J. Cote, Ed., Research Activities in Atmospheric and Oceanic Modelling. WMO, S1 33-34 [Available online at http://bluebook.meteoinfo.ru/uploads/2010/individual-articles/01_Sako_Hiroshi_aircraft_temp.pdf].
14 Schwartz, B., and S. G. Benjamin, 1995: A comparison of temperature and wind measurements from ACARSequipped aircraft and rawinsondes. Wea. Forecasting, 10, 528-544.   DOI