Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14191/Atmos.2013.23.2.171

Forecast Sensitivity to Observations for High-Impact Weather Events in the Korean Peninsula  

Kim, SeHyun (Atmospheric Predictability and Data Assimilation Laboratory, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University)
Kim, Hyun Mee (Atmospheric Predictability and Data Assimilation Laboratory, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University)
Kim, Eun-Jung (Numerical Data Application Division, Korea Meteorological Administration)
Shin, Hyun-Cheol (Numerical Data Application Division, Korea Meteorological Administration)
Publication Information
Atmosphere / v.23, no.2, 2013 , pp. 171-186 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently, the number of observations used in a data assimilation system is increasing due to the enormous amount of observations, including satellite data. However, it is not clear that all of these observations are always beneficial to the performance of the numerical weather prediction (NWP). Therefore, it is important to evaluate the effect of observations on these forecasts so that the observations can be used more usefully in NWP process. In this study, the adjoint-based Forecast Sensitivity to Observation (FSO) method with the KMA Unified Model (UM) is applied to two high-impact weather events which occurred in summer and winter in Korea in an effort to investigate the effects of observations on the forecasts of these events. The total dry energy norm is used as a response function to calculate the adjoint sensitivity. For the summer case, TEMP observations have the greatest total impact while BOGUS shows the greatest impact per observation for all of the 24-, 36-, and 48-hour forecasts. For the winter case, aircraft, ATOVS, and ESA have the greatest total impact for the 24-, 36-, and 48-hour forecasts respectively, while ESA has the greatest impact per observation. Most of the observation effects are horizontally located upwind or in the vicinity of the Korean peninsula. The fraction of beneficial observations is less than 50%, which is less than the results in previous studies. As an additional experiment, the total moist energy norm is used as a response function to measure the sensitivity of 24-hour forecast error to observations. The characteristics of the observation impact with the moist energy response function are generally similar to those with the dry energy response function. However, the ATOVS observations were found to be sensitive to the response function, showing a positive (a negative) effect on the forecast when using the dry (moist) norm for the summer case. For the winter case, the dry and moist energy norm experiments show very similar results because the adjoint of KMA UM does not calculate the specific humidity of ice properly such that the dry and moist energy norms are very similar except for the humidity in air that is very low in winter.
Keywords
Forecast sensitivity to observation; KMA unified model; data assimilation; adjointbased method; observation impact;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Baker, N. and R. Daley, 2000: Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation-targeting problem. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1431-1454.   DOI
2 Bouttier, F. and G. Kelly, 2001: Observing-system experiments in the ECMWF 4D-Var data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 1469-1488.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Buizza, R., 1994: Localization of optimal perturbations using a projection operator. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 1647-1681.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Cardinali, C., 2009: Monitoring the observation impact on the short-range forecast. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 239-250.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Clayton, A. M., 2004: VAR Scientific Documentation 60, UK Met. Office., 1-12.
6 Edwards, J. M. and A. Slingo, 1996: Studies with a flexible new radiation code. 1: Choosing a configuration for a large scale model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 689-719.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 English, S., R. Saunders, B. Candy, M. Forsythe, and A. Collard, 2004. 'Met Office satellite data OSEs.' Pp. 146-156 in Proc. Third WMO workshop on the impact of various observing systems on numerical weather prediction, Alpbach, Austria. WMO/TD-1228, Geneva.
8 Errico, R. M., 1997: What is an adjoint model? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2577-2591.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Essery, R., M. Best, and P. Cox, 2001: MOSES 2.2 technical documentation. Hadley Centre technical note 30.
10 Gelaro, R., Rolf H. Langland, Simon Pellerin, Ricardo Todling, 2010: The THORPEX Observation Impact Intercomparison Experiment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 4009-4025.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Gelaro, R., and Y. Zhu, 2009: Examination of observation impacts derived from observing system experiments (OSEs) and adjoint models. Tellus, 61A, 179-193.
12 Gregory, D., R., Kershaw, and P. M. Inness, 1997: Parameterization of Momentum Transport by Convection 2: Test in single-Column and General Circulation Models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 1153-1184.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Joo, S., A. C. Lorenc, and R. Marriott, 2012: The impact of Metop and other satellite data within the Met Office global NWP system using an adjoint-based sensitivity method, Forecasting Research Tech. Rep. 562, Met Office, Bracknell, United Kingdom.
14 Kershaw, R. and D. Gregory, 1997: Parameterization of Momentum Transport by Convection 1: Theory and Cloud Modeling Results. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 1133-1151.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Jung, B.-J. and H. M. Kim, 2009: Moist-adjoint based forecast sensitivities for a heavy snowfall event over the Korean peninsula on 4-5 March 2004. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D15104.   DOI
16 Jung, B.-J. and H. M. Kim, F. Zhang, and C.-C. Wu, 2012: Effect of targeted dropsonde observations and best track data on the track forecasts of Typhoon Sinlaku (2008) using an Ensemble Kalman Filter. Tellus A, 64, 14984.   DOI
17 Kelly, G., J.-N. Thépaut, R. Buizza, and C. Cardinali, 2007: The value of observations. I: Data denial experiments for the Atlantic and Pacific. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 1803-1815.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Kim, H. M., J. K. Kay, and B.-J. Jung, 2008: Application of adjoint-based forecast sensitivities to Asian dust transport events in Korea. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 195, 335-343.   DOI
19 Kim, S.-M., H. M. Kim, S.-W. Joo, H.-C. Shin, and D. Won, 2011: Development of tools for calculating forecast sensitivities to the initial condition in the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) Unified Model (UM). Atmosphere, 21(2), 163-172. (in Korean with English abstract)
20 Kunii, M., T. Miyoshi, and E. Kalnay, 2012: Estimating impact of real observations in regional numerical weather prediction using an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1975-1987.   DOI
21 Langland, R. H. and N. L. Baker, 2004: Estimation of observation impact using the NRL atmospheric variational data assimilation adjoint system. Tellus, 56A, 189-201.
22 Lock, A. R., A. R. Brown, M. R. Bush, G. M. Martin, and R. N. B. Smith, 2000: A new boundary-layer mixing scheme. Part 1: Scheme description and single-column model tests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3187-3199.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Zhu, Y. and R. Gelaro, 2008: Observation sensitivity calculations using the adjoint of the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 335-351.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Lord, S., Zapotocny, T., and Jung, J., 2004: 'Observing system experiments with NCEP's global forecast system.' pp. 56-62 in Third WMO workshop on the impact of various observing systems on numerical weather prediction, Alpbach, Austria, WMO/TD-1228, Geneva.
25 Webster, S., A. Brown, A. R., Cameron, D. R., and C. P. Jones, 2003: Improvements to the representation of orography in the Met Office Unified Model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 1989-2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Wilson, D. R. and S. P. Ballard, 1999: A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK Meteorological Office unified model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 1607-1636.   DOI