Browse > Article

A Component Analysis of Three Types of Bullying Among Elementary School Students: An Application of Social Relations Model  

Lee, Gyeong-Hui (경남대학교)
Go, Jae-Hong (중앙대학교)
Publication Information
Korean journal of psychology:General / v.25, no.1, 2006 , pp. 23-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
The present study purported to examine the degree to which proportion of bullying takes place among harmer, victim, and their relationship in three types of bullying. It was also investigated which personality traits is related to bullying and victimizing behaviors and the reciprocity of bullying. The subjects were the 5th and 6th graders of elementary schools, Changwon city. They were randomly divided into 52 groups of all 4 boys(208 boys) and 45 groups of all 4 girls(180 girls) respectively. Each group with 4 students of the same sex. To begin with, groups were instructed to fill in the questionnaire about their personality traits and self-esteem. And then they rated all other members in their group via a round robin method. The major results as follows: First, harmer effect was about 16%, victim effect was about 6%, and their relationship effect was about 25% in bullying. Specifically, linguistic bullying was more triggered by their relationships, and harmer effect was more obvious in the boys than in the girls. Second, personality traits presumably related to bullying behaviors were not salient. But the girls who were lower in self-esteem and agreeableness were more likely to be bullied by peers. The boys who were less agreeable were more likely to become the target of alienation and linguistic bullying. Overall, there were stronger relations between personality factors and bullying among the girls than those among boys. Lastly, the boys showed reciprocity in all types of bullying. The reciprocity was particularly remarkable in an alienation type. Meanwhile, the girls showed less reciprocity in all kinds of bullying.
Keywords
bullying; Social Relations Model; reciprocity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 가우디 (1999), 왕따리포트. 서울: 우리교육
2 이춘재, 곽금주 (2000). 집단따돌림 경험 유형에 따른 자기개념과 사회적 지지. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 13(1), 65-80
3 최미경, 도현심 (2000). 또래에 의한 괴롭힘이 청소년의 자아존중감에 미치는 영향에 관한 종단적 연구. 아동학회지, 23(5), 51-65
4 Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., & Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. Journal of Consulting and clinical Psychology, 60, 783-792   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Costa, P. T., & McCare, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assesment Resources
6 Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Sharp, S. (1996). Self-esteem, response style and victimization: Possible ways of preventing victimization through parenting and school based training programmes. School Psychology International, 17, 347-357   DOI
8 Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances experimental social psychology(Vol 18, pp. 142-182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press
9 김용태, 박한샘 (1997). 청소년 친구 따돌림에 대한 실태조사. 청소년 대화의 광장(편), 따돌리는 아이들, 따돌림 당하는 아이들. 서울: 청소년대화의 광장
10 Kenny, D. A., & Acitelli, L. K. (2001). Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439-448   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Smith, P. K. (1991). The silent nightmare: Bullying and victimization in school peer groups. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 4, 243-248
12 노성호 (2000). 집단따돌림을 통한 피해와 그 영향. 한국피해자학회지, 9(2), 5-30
13 McCrae, R. R.,& Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90   DOI
14 정윤주 (2004). 학령기 아동의 또래수용 및 가장 친한 학급 친구의 상호성에 따른 심리사회적 적응. 대한가정학회지, 42(7), 19-32
15 Coie, J. D., Cillessen, A. H., Dodge, K. A., Hubband, J. A., Schwartz, D., Lemerise, E. A., & Bareman, H. (1999). It takes two to fight: A test of relational factors and a method for assessing aggressive dyads. Child Development, 35, 1179-1188
16 Kenny, D. A. (2004). http://users.ren.com/dakenny/srmp.htm
17 조선일보 (2004. 01. 13). 초등학생 학교폭력 중고생 보다 심각
18 이상균 (1998). 학교에서의 영향을 미치는 요인. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
19 Schafer, M., Korn, S., Smith, P. K., Hunter, S. C., Mora-Merchan, J. A., Singer, M. M., & Meulen, K. (2004). Lonely in the crowd: Recollections of bullying. British Journal od Developmental Psychology, 22, 379-394   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bulling and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere
21 강은희, 이은희, 임은정 (2002). 집단따돌림 행동유형과 심리적 특성. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 14(2), 445-460
22 Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle-school children: Stability, self-perceived competence. British Journal of Development Psychology, 12, 315-329   DOI
23 Hodges, E. V., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of Friendship: Protection against and escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 94-101   DOI   ScienceOn
24 김윤경, 이옥경 (2001). 아동과 청소년의 또래관계에 따른 심리사회적 적응과 행동 특성. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 14(2), 65-82
25 이규미, 문형춘, 홍혜영 (1998). 상담사례를 통해서 본 '왕따'현상. 서울특별시 청소년 종합상담실(편), 왕따현상에 대한 이해와 상담접근.
26 Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. NY: The Guilford Press
27 Olweus, D. (1994). Annotation: Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 335, 1171-1190
28 Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). The relationship of Eysenck's personality factors and self-esteem to bully-victim behavior in Australian schoolboys. Personality and Individual Difference, 14(2), 371-373   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular and controversial children. Child Development, 66, 754-763   DOI   ScienceOn
30 김혜원, 이해경 (2000). 집단괴롭힘의 가해와 파해행동에 영향을 미치는 사회적, 심리적 변인들. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14(1), 45-64
31 박나영, 고재홍 (2005). 남녀 중학생의 집단따돌림 발생원천의 성분비교: 사회관계모형분석. 청소년상담연구, 13(1), 43-54
32 신재선, 정문자 (2002). 초등학생의 또래 괴롭힘 유형과 스트레스 대처행동에 관한 연구. 아동학회지, 23(5), 123-138
33 Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722   DOI   ScienceOn
34 정은순, 김이순, 이화자, 김영혜, 송미경 (2002). 초등학생들이 집단따돌림에 관한 연구. 아동간호학회지, 8(4), 422-434
35 조성호 (1999). 학교폭력에 대한 심리학적 개입의 허와 실. 학교폭력에 대한 심리학적 접근의 모색 심포지엄. 한국심리학회발표논문집
36 모리타 (松甫善滿, 1998), 靑少年問題, 日本 靑少年問題硏究會, 45(12), 25
37 민병모, 이경임, 정재창 (1997). NEO 인성검사 (NEO PI-RS). 서울: PSI컨설팅
38 박경숙, 손희권, 송혜정 (1998). 학생의 왕따(집단따돌림과 괴롭힘) 현상에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원
39 한종철, 김인경 (2000). 또래 따돌림과 심리사회적 부적응. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 6(2), 103-114
40 김석진 (1999). 초등학교 집단따돌림 가해실태와 관련요인 연구. 경기대학교 석사학위논문
41 Bagwell, C. L., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1998). Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 64, 139-151   DOI   ScienceOn
42 최은숙 (1999). 집단따돌림 가해, 피해 경향과 관련된 심리적 요인에 관한 일 연구. 서강대학교 석사학위논문
43 Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. NY: Basic Books
44 고재홍 (1997). 우리는 받은 만큼만 주는가? 갈등이 상호성 규범의 준수에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 11(2), 53-75
45 Ferrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. In M. Tonry & N. Morris(Eds.), Crime and justice(Vol 17, pp. 381-459). Chicago: Unviersity of Chicago Press
46 Parker, J., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389   DOI   ScienceOn
47 구본용 (1999). 청소년의 또래관계. 청소년 문제 토론 광장 발표논문집. 한국청소년상담원
48 박미영 (1999). 자기존중감을 구성하는 요인: 영역별 우열 및 자기수용과 전반적인 자기 존중감 간의 관계. 부산대학교 석사학위 논문
49 황성숙 (1998). 학교내 집단따돌림에 대한 일 연구. 고려대학교 석사학위논문.
50 Matsui, T., Kakuyama, T., Tsuzuki, Y., & Onglatco, M. (1996). Long-term outcomes of early victimization by peers among Japanese male university students: Model of a vicious cycle. Psychological Reports, 79, 387-395