SEM-CT: Comparison of Problem Solving Processes in Science(S), Engineering(E), Mathematic(M), and Computational Thinking(CT) |
Nam, Younkyeong
(부산대학교 지구과학교육과)
Yoon, JinA (부산대학교 과학교육연구소) Han, KeumJoo (부산대학교 수학교육과) Jeong, JuHun (부산대학교 소프트웨어교육센터) |
1 | ATC21S (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.atc21s.org |
2 | ISTE & CSTA (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for K-12 education. |
3 | Burgett, T., Folk, R., Fulton, J., Peel, A., Pontelli, E., & Szczepanski, V. (2015). DISSECT: Analysis of pedagogical techniques to integrate computational thinking into K-12 curricula. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE (pp. 1-9). IEEE. |
4 | Henderson, P. B. (2009) Ubiquitous computational thinking, Computer, (2009 October), 100-102. |
5 | 유중현.김종혜 (2008). 문제 해결과정에서의 정보과학적 사고 능력에 대한 개념적 고찰. 정보창의교육논문지, 2(2), 15-24. |
6 | 박성빈.안성진 (2016). 컴퓨팅 사고력의 역량 탐색 연구 : 소프트웨어개발자를 중심으로. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 19(5), 41-53. DOI |
7 | Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. Acm Inroads, 2 (1), 48-54. DOI |
8 | Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1 (2), 67-69. |
9 | Selby, C., Dorling, M., & Woollard, J. (2014). Evidence of assessing computational thinking. Brookes e Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1-12. |
10 | Partnership for 21st Century Skills(P21). (2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.p21.org |
11 | Deek, F. P., Hiltz, S. R., Kimmel, H. & Router, N. (1999). Cognitive Assessment of Students' Problem Solving and Program Development Skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (3), 317-326. DOI |
12 | Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1 (1), 3-14. DOI |
13 | Lunetta, V., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2. |
14 | So, W. W. M., Zhan, Y., Chow, S. C. F., & Leung, C. F. (2017). Analysis of STEM activities in primary students' science projects in an informal learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-12 |
15 | Chin, C., & Brown, D. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549. DOI |
16 | 교육부 (2015a). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책9]. 서울 : 교육부. |
17 | National Research Council(NRC). (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education?. National Academies Press. |
18 | Schwab, J. (1966). The teaching of science as inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
19 | 김영민.서혜애.박종석 (2013). 잘 알려진 창의적 과학자들의 과학적 문제 발견 패턴 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 33(7), 1285-1299. DOI |
20 | Hoover, S. & Feldhusen, J. (1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation th-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 838-848. DOI |
21 | 한효순.최병순.강순민.박종윤 (2002). '생각하는 과학'프로그램의 변인활동이 초등학생의 변인통제 능력에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), 571-585. |
22 | 전윤식.김정섭.윤경미 (2003). 창의성 교육의 새로운 접근 : 문제 찾기. 교육학연구, 41(3), 215-238. |
23 | 조희형.김희경.윤희숙.이기영 (2009). 과학 교육의 이론과 실제. 서울: 교육과학사. |
24 | 조현국 (2018). 2015 개정 교육과정에서 나타나는 과학적 탐구 요소 분석 : 과학탐구실험을 중심으로. 교과교육학연구, 22(3), 208-218. DOI |
25 | Dewey, J. (1938). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan. |
26 | Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18 (2), 209-234. DOI |
27 | 박종원 (2004). 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안 : 인지적 측면을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386. |
28 | Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1), 1-10. DOI |
29 | Sternberg R.J., & Lubart, T. (1993). Creative giftedness: A multivariante investment ap-proach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37 (1), 7-15. DOI |
30 | 하주현 (2003). 문제발견, 창의적 사고, 창의적 인성의 관계. 교육심리연구, 17(3), 99-115. |
31 | 김영채 (1997). 창의적 문제 해결 : 창의력의 이론, 개발과 수업. 서울: 교육과학사 |
32 | Carson, D. K., & Runco, M. A. (1999). Creative problem solving and problem finding in young adults: Interconnections with stress, hassles, and coping abilities. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33 (3), 167-188. DOI |
33 | 박미진 (2016). 과학개념 융합을 통한 문제발견 및 문제해결 과정에서 나타나는 과학영재의 창의적 사고의 특성. 박사학위논문, 부산대학교. |
34 | 한병래 (2013). 초등정보교육에서의 계산적사고 교육을 위한 언플러그드 컴퓨팅 방법에 관한 고찰. 정보교육학회논문지, 17(2), 147-156. |
35 | Harms, H. R., & Janosz, D. A. (2012). Pre-engineering. McGraw Hill Education. |
36 | 황혜정.나귀수.최승현.박경미.임재훈.서동엽 (2016). 수학교육학신론. 서울: 문음사. |
37 | NCTM(1991). Mathematical modeling in the secondary school curriculum, In Frank Swetz and J. S. Hartzler(Eds.). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. |
38 | 이동영.남윤경 (2018) 공학설계 측면에서 한국 STEAM 프로그램 분석틀 제안. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 11(1), 63-77. DOI |
39 | NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. |
40 | Nam, Y., Lee, S. J., & Paik, S. H. (2016). The impact of engineering integrated science (EIS) curricula on first-year technical high school students' attitudes toward science and perceptions of engineering. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12 (7), 1881-1907. |
41 | Hjalmarson, M., & Lesh, R. (2008). Engineering and design research: Intersections for education research and design. In Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. (pp. 114-128). Routledge. |
42 | 문대영 (2008). STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학 교육 프로그램 모형 개발. 공학교육연구, 11(2), 90-101. DOI |
43 | 김성준 (2002). 학교 대수 도입과 관련된 논의. 학교수학, 4(1), 29-47 |
44 | 이영준.백성혜.신재홍.유헌창.정인기.안상진.최정원.전성균 (2014). 초중등 단계 Computational Thinking 도입을 위한 기초 연구[BD14060010]. 한국과학창의재단. |
45 | Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., Stohlmann. M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, (J-PEER), 4 (1), 1-13. |
46 | 교육부 (2015b). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 8]. 서울 : 교육부. |
47 | Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c1957. |
48 | Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press |
49 | Burton, D. (1985). The History of mathematics : An introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. |
50 | Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (7), 611-623. DOI |
51 | Rodriguez, B., Rader, C. & Camp, T. (2016). Using student performance to assess CS unplugged activities in a classroom environment. In proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 95-100). ACM. |
52 | National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry in the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. |
53 | Taub, R., Armoni, M. and Ben-Ari, M., (2012). CS unplugged and middle-school students' views, attitudes, and intentions regarding CS. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(2), No 8. |
54 | Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., &Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25 (1), 127-147. DOI |
55 | 최숙영 (2016). 문제해결의 관점에서 컴퓨팅 사고력 증진을 위한 교수학습에 대한 연구. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 19(1), 53-62. DOI |
56 | Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49 (3), 33-35. DOI |
57 | Wing, J. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 366 (1881), 3717-3725. DOI |
58 | Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational thinking in education: Where does it fit? A systematic literary review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07659. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/856e/ed bf3ad4902e86ba94ab8dd124e6a1495889.pdf |
59 | 정웅열.이영준 (2018). SW.수학.과학 융합형 교수.학습 자료에 나타난 교육과정 성취기준 내용 분석. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 21(5), 11-23. DOI |
60 | Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86 (2), 175-218. DOI |
61 | Bybee, R., Carlson-Powell, J., & Trowbridge, L. (2008). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. Columbus: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall. |
62 | Wang, L., Zhang, R., Clarke, D., & Wang, W. (2014). Enactment of scientific inquiry: Observation of two cases at different grade levels in China Mainland. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (2), 280-297. DOI |