Browse > Article

A Study on the Teaching·Learning Management Status and Improvement Plan about 'Creative Engineering Design' Lesson of 'Technology·Home Economics Subject' for High School Teachers  

Kim, SeongIl (세한대학교)
Lim, YunJin (대전전민고등학교)
Publication Information
대한공업교육학회지 / v.41, no.1, 2016 , pp. 128-146 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to provide a basic research data for increasing the quality of 'creative engineering design' lesson and the teaching learning capability of high school teachers by analyzing the teaching learning management status and improvement plan of 'technology home economics subject' lesson for high school teachers. In order to investigate the teaching learning management status, the survey questionnaires from 63 teachers were collected from high school teachers who teach technology home economics subject currently and analyzed by statistical program SPSS 20. The main results of this study were as follows: First, for the contents of 'creative engineering design' lesson, the highest mean of response was 'creative thinking method'(M=4.22). In the learning activities, the teachers perceived the importance of the 'idea concept' highly. Second, in the management of 'creative engineering design' lesson, the teachers perceived the importance of the secure of tool, material budget, and practice space for the lesson highly. In the teaching capabilities, the teacher perceived the importance of the preparing teaching learning strategy most($$M{\frac{._-}{.}}4.14$$). Third, the teachers preferred to product for making uncomfortable things better in life and the other production outside from the content of textbook. Fourth, in the ratio of practice:theory lesson, they perceived the ratio of 3:7(36.5%), 4:6(25.4%), and 2:8(23.8%) are appropriate. In the assessment, the combination of production, portfolio, and presentation was preferred most. Fifth, there were statistically significant difference in teachers' interest and satisfaction and contents about 'creative engineering design' lesson between groups divided by the existence of practice space, certification held(technology teacher, non technology teacher), etc. Therefore, in order to improve the interest and satisfaction about the 'creative engineering design' lesson, the secure of space for technology practice and material budget were required. In addition, training and seminars program for improving the teaching capability for 'creative engineering design' lesson were required.
Keywords
creative engineering design; technology.home economics subject; creative thinking method; assessment; satisfaction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강종표 (2011). 창의 공학 설계 기법에 의한 초등 예비교사의 실과 실천적 과제의 창의적 구상에 관한 연구. 한국실과교육학회지, 24(3), 281-303.
2 곽문규(2004). 창의적 공학설계 교육 현황 및 발전 방안. 동국대학교 자료.
3 교육부(2011). 실과(기술.가정) 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-361호.
4 교육부(2015). 고등학교 교육과정(I, II, III). 교육부 고시 제 2015-74호 [별책 4] 629-642.
5 김성일(2014). 예비 기술 교사들의 창의공학설계 수업에 대한 인식 연구. 한국기술교육학회, 14(1), 91-110.
6 김지숙(2014). 기술학에서의 융합교육(STEAM) 실현. 한국실과교육학회 학술대회논문집, 69-88.
7 송동주(2010). 서언: 창의적, 체계적인 공학설계 교육의 필요성. 공학교육, 17(1), 17.
8 송윤섭, 유기완(2013). 창의공학설계. 복두출판사.
9 이건상, 김강(2012). 창의적 공학설계방법론 교육에 관한 연구. 공학교육연구, 15(4), 94-100.
10 이창래, 문석현(2015). 창의적 종합설계 경진대회 우수작. 공학교육, 22(2), 65-72.
11 이태식 외(2009). 공과대학 캡스톤 디자인(창의공학설계)교육과정 운영실태 및 학습 만족도 조사. 공학교육연구, 12(2), 36-50.
12 이창훈(2008). ADDIE 모형에 터한 창의 공학 설계 교육 프로그램 모형 개발과 적용 방안. 한국기술교육학회지, 8(1), 131-146.
13 한국공학교육인증원(2016). Retrieved Jan. 28, 2016 from http://www.abeek.or.kr.
14 임철일(2012). 공과대학 학생들의 창의성교육에 관한 인식. 공학교육연구, 15(2), 30-37.
15 임철일 외(2014). 국내 공학교육에서의 창의성 연구동향과 발전과제, 공학교육연구, 17(5), 33-40.
16 정은수 외(2008). 국내외 공과대학들의 교육목표 분석. 공학교육연구, 12(4), 4-53.
17 National Academy of Engineering(2009). Engineering K-12 Education: understanding the status and improving the prospects. The National Academies Press.
18 이재민 (2015). 창의설계교육을 위한 교과과정 및 종합설계실 구축 방안. 한국디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 16(1), 53-61.