Browse > Article

Study on Recognitions of Department of Technology Education Professors Introducing 'Creative Engineering Design' Unit of Highschool Technology.Home Economics  

Kim, Seong-Il (Technology Education Dept. of Sehan University)
Publication Information
대한공업교육학회지 / v.39, no.1, 2014 , pp. 128-142 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to provide a basis information for the education direction of 'creative engineering design' lesson to highschool students and pre-technology teachers by analyzing pre-experienced the d epartment of technology professors' recognitions, according to the newly opened unit 'creative engineering design' in 2009 revised highschool technology home economics education curriculum. The survey questionnaire was composed of 34 questions and collected from 16 department of technology education professors. The data was analyzed by SPSS program. The results of study were as follows : First, in 'creative engineering design' educational objectives, the highest average level(M) of response was problem solving ability, the opportunity of engineering experience and creativity improvement were followed. In the response about 'creative engineering design' educational contents, the average level(M) of the creative thinking method education was the highest(3.94). and the following important level was the write training education for presentation. Second, in the 'creative engineering design' educational areas, the professors preferred the idea conception, design, and production manufacturing area. In the teaching learning method, the average level(M) of design-based learning method was the first. and PBL, problem solving method were favored Third, in the 'creative engineering design' lesson manage, the secure of practice room and material cost, and the check of the progress situations were needed preferentially. In the education assessments, various and combined assessment preferred such as production, portfolio, and presentation. Fourth, in the pre-technology teachers' lesson of the university course, the product manufacturing level was preferred production to improve uncomfortable thing in life. The major difficulty in product manufacturing was the lack of major knowledge and product conception.
Keywords
creative engineering design; highschool technology home economics; survey questionnaire; 2009 revised education curriculum;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 이동명(2012). 공학설계를 위한 전공연구 교수법 사례 연구. 공학교육연구, 15(3), 2-77.
2 한국공학교육인증원(2014). 2014년 공학교육인증(EAC/CAS)평가위원 워그샵, KEC 2005인증기준. 서울 : 한국공학교육인증원.
3 전국공학교육혁신(연구)센터(2014). Retrieved March. 18, 2014 from http://www.abeek.or.kr/htmls_kr/contents.jsp?menu_l=6&menu_m=207&menu_s=209
4 Doepker, P. E., and Dym, C, L.(2007). Design Engineering Education. ASME Transactions, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(7), 657-658.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 이건상, 김강(2012). 창의적 공학설계방법론 교육에 관한 연구. 공학교육연구, 5(4), 94-100.
6 교육과학기술부(2011a). 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-361호 [별책1] 초.증등 교육 과정 총론.
7 교육과학기술부(2011b). 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-361호 [별책10] 실과(기술.가정) 교육 과정.
8 김용세(2011). 설계 기본 소양 교육을 위한 창의적 공학 설계. 공학 교육, 18(2), 35-37.
9 김인숙, 김동철(2013). 종합설계 교과목의 교수-학습 결과 분석. 공학교육연구, 16(2), 31-36.
10 이종수 외(2008). 체험학습기반의 기초 창의공학설계 교육 및 운영. 공학교육연구, 11(2), 32-41.
11 이태식 외(2009). 공과대학 캡스톤 디자인(창의공학설계)교육과정 운영실태 및 학습 만족도 조사. 공학교육연구, 12(2), 36-50.
12 정동명(2010). 창의공학설계. 서울 : 생능.
13 지해성(2013). 학제간 팀별 설계프로젝트 기반 산학공동 공학설계교육. 공학교육연구, 16(3), 51-60.