Browse > Article

Consideration on industry department test of vocational education area in college scholastic ability test  

Hahm, Seung-Yeon (Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation)
Publication Information
대한공업교육학회지 / v.32, no.2, 2007 , pp. 23-46 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to present improvement directions of college scholastic ability test on industry department. Industry department test were classify and abstracted sampling test on contents and movement domain, analyzed example items of college scholastic ability test on industry department. Research methods used in this study were review of related literature, the item analysis and item pattern analysis between college scholastic ability test on introduction to industry and curriculum, contents of textbook. After finding a problem of developing items, trying to find a solution to the problem and developing an up-to-date method of items was to present improvement. Based on the result of the study, some recommendations for future researches were made as follows: First, a phenomenon of making same contents items over again and no making items not on made the items ever have to cut. Second, Time to read and make sense of items have to reduce because depend on the degree of difficulty related on time to understand of items. Third, the depth of textbook contents has to develop on curriculum this year. Fourth, the succeeding study on linkage between college scholastic ability test and simulation of college scholastic ability test. Fifth, verification validity on contents of new movement domain is developed new and striking test items.
Keywords
college scholastic ability test; vocational education area; industry department; item analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 교육인적자원부(2001). 실업교육 육성 방안
2 교육인적자원부(2001). 2005학년도 대학수학능력시험 체제 개편안
3 교육인적자원부(2007). 초.증등학교 교육과정
4 국립교육평가원(1992b). 대학수학능력시험과 교수-학습 방향. 전국교육평가심포지엄 보고서 92-2
5 이용순. 김희필. 문대영. 신경구. 조동헌. 최규남, 함승연(2003). 2005 수능 작업탐구영역의 과목별 성취기준과 평가기준 개발-공업입문. 수탁연구 03-8-5. 한국직업능력개발원 교육인적자원부
6 임찬빈, 양길석, 성병창(1998). 대학수학능력시험 영향 연구. 연구보고 RRE 98-9. 한국교육과정평가원
7 황정규(1998). 학교학습과 교육평가. 교육과학사
8 Bloom,B. S. (1956). Taxonomy Educational Objective I,Cognitive Domain. New York: David Mckay Company,Inc
9 Brown,B. O.,et al. (1968). The Florid Taxonomy of Cognitive Behaviors. Institute for Development of Human Resources. The University of Florida,Gairesville
10 Mager,R. F.,& Beach K. M. Jr. (1967). Developing Vocational Instruction. Feason Publishers
11 이용순. 김수원. 이병욱. 김진구. 이수정(2003). 2005 수능 작업탐구영역의 과목별 성취기준과 평가기준 개발: 총론. 수탁연구 03-8-1. 한국직업능력개발원 교육인적자원부
12 성태제(2002). 현대교육평가. 학지사
13 이무근. 원상봉(2000). 작업교육과정과 평가. 교육과학사
14 교육부(1997). 공업계열 고등학교 전문교과 교육과정
15 교육인적자원부(2007). 고등학교 교육과정 (I),(II)
16 Gagne,R. M. & Briggs L. (1979). Principles of Instructional Design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
17 이종승, 박도순, 이종재, 남명호, 김홍원, 김정겸 외(2004). 대학수학능력시험 개선 방안 연구. 한국교육개발원.한국교육과정평가원
18 국립교육평가원(1992a). 대학입학학력고사 출제문항 분석 연구: '92학년도 대학입학 학력고사를 중심으로. 연구보고 '92-1
19 이재학 외(2004). 우리나라와 주요국의 대학입학 수학 시험문제 비교 연구, 수학교육, 43(4),349-380
20 김종선, 김기웅 공역(1978). 교육목표분류학: 심리운동적 영역(Anita J. Harrow). 동화 문화사
21 Tyler,R. W. (1970). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. The University of Chicago Press
22 김진구, 이수정 외(2004). 대학수학능력시험 출제 매뉴얼: 작업탐구영역. 한국교육과정평가원