Browse > Article

Exploring Strategies for Applying TRIZ to Technology Education  

Moon, Daeyoung (Busan National University of Education)
Publication Information
대한공업교육학회지 / v.31, no.2, 2006 , pp. 155-176 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the strategies for applying TRIZ to technology education. This study was carried out through literature review on contradiction, 40 principles, 76 standard solutions, multi screen method, effects, the law of technology evolution, and ARIZ, and questionnaire survey to investigate the validity. Through this study the strategies for applying TRIZ to technology education were proposed and the validity was identified. Only the '40 Principles' was appropriate to technology education of elementary and middle school. The results of this study were as follows; In elementary school technology education, segmentation, extraction, local quality, asymmetry, consolidation, universality, counterweight, do it in reverse, mediator, self service, dispose, flexible membranes or thin films, changing the color, homogeneity, rejecting and regenerating parts, and composite materials were suitable. And in middle school technology education, segmentation, extraction, local quality, asymmetry, consolidation, universality, counterweight, prior counteraction, prior action, cushion in advance, do it in reverse, dynamicity, partial or excessive action, continuity of useful action, convert harm into benefit, mediator, self service, dispose, flexible membranes or thin films, changing the color, homogeneity, rejecting and regenerating parts, transformation of properties, phase transition, thermal expansion, and composite materials were suitable.
Keywords
TRIZ; Inventive Problem Solving Theory; 40 Principles;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김용익(2006). 초등 실과교과에 TRIZ 이론의 적용 가능성 탐색. 한국실과교육학회지, 19(1), 57-74
2 조승호, 정종완(2006). TRIZ(트리즈)를 활용한 발명교육프로그램 개발 연구. 대한공업교육학회지, 31(1), 86-109
3 Altshuller, G. S. (1994). And suddenly the inventor appeared. Technical Innovation Center
4 Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575   DOI
5 Mann, D. (2002). Evolving the inventive principles. The Triz Journal, 2002.8. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
6 Marsh, D. G., Waters, F. H. & Marsh, T. D.(2004), 40 Inventive principles with applications in education. The Triz Journal, 2004.4. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
7 Sellwood, P. (1989). The role of problem solving in developing thinking skills. The Technology Teacher, 49(8), 3-10
8 Waetjen, W. B. (1989). Technological problem solving : a proposal. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 464)
9 Zusman, A. & Zlotin, B. (1999). Overview of creative methods. The Triz Journal, 1999.7. [online available http://www.triz-joumal.com]
10 김효준, 정진하, 권정휘(2004). 생각의 창의성 TRIZ. 지혜
11 Johnson, S. D. (1994). Research on problem solving instruction: What works, what doesn't? The Technology Teacher, 54(5), 27-29, 36
12 류창열(2004). 21세기 지식기반사회의 기술교육 방향 재정립을 위한 기술학의 정의와 교육실천방안 탐색. 한국기술교육학회지, 4(1), 13-25
13 Domb, E. (1998). Increase creativity to imprive quality. The Triz Journal, 1998.12. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
14 Kowalick, J. (1999). Problem solving system: What's next after TRIZ? The Triz Journal, 1999.3. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
15 Zlotin, B., Zusman, A., Kaplan, L., Visnepolschi, S., Proseanic, V. & Malkin, S. (2001). TRIZ beyond technology: The theory and practice of applying TRIZ to non-technical areas. The Triz Journal, 2001.1. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
16 김익수(2006). 공업계 고등학교 전문교과 수업에서 문제중심학습이 학생들의 행동목표 성취도에 미치는 효과. 박사학위 논문. 충남대학교
17 Maley, D. (1986). Reseach and experimentation in technology education: problem-solving and decision-making in the technology laboratory. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association
18 문대영(2001). 초.중등학교 학생의 적응자.혁신자 역할분담 문제해결 활동이 기술적 창의력 계발에 미치는 효과. 박사학위논문. 충남대학교
19 Atkins, R. (1998). Creativity in a Russian elementary school. The Triz Journal, 1998.2. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
20 김현수, 오국진(2005). TRIZ NFTM-TRIZ 지속적인 창의력 시스템. 도서출판 인터비젼
21 Kowalick, J. (1998). Creativity breakthroughs with children using higher level thinking. The Triz Journal, 1998.2. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
22 최유현(1995). 기술교과 교육에 있어서 기술적 교양 목표 성취를 위한 문제해결 수업전략의 효과. 박사학위 논문. 서울대학교
23 Schweizer, T. P. (2002). Integrating TRIZ into curriculum: an educational imperative. The Triz Journal, 2002.11. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
24 김병재, 박성균(2005). 알기쉬운 트리즈 -창의적 문제해결 이론-. 도서출판 인터비젼
25 Yi, S. (1996). Problem solving in technology education at secondary level as perceived by technology educators in The United Kingdom and The United States. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University
26 박영택, 박수동(1999). 발명특허의 과학, 현실과미래
27 정진현(2003). 뇌과학과 실과를 통한 창의적 발명교육 프로그램 개발 방법에 관한 연구. 한국실과교육학회지, 16(3), 91-106
28 Zlotin, B. & Zusman, A. (1999). TRIZ and pedagogy. The Triz Journal, 1999.10. [online available http://www.triz-joumal.com]
29 McCade, J. (1990). Problem solving: Much more than just design. Journal of Technology Education, 2(1), 29-42
30 Hyatt, M. (2002). An overview of synoptics and the six challenges of creativity. The Triz Journal, 2002.10. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
31 Mann, D. (2001). TRIZ thinking hats. The Triz Journal, 2001.3. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
32 Hyatt, M. (1999). Overview of metaphoric models for creativity. The Triz Journal, 1999.11. [online available http://www.triz-journal.com]
33 김용익(2004). 문제중심학습을 교육대학교 초등 생활기술교육에 적용하기 위한 방안 모색. 한국실과교육학회지, 17(2), 1-18