Browse > Article

A Study on the Development of Educational Program for Invention on the Basis of TRIZ  

Cho, Seung-ho (Seoul Technical High School)
Jung, Jong-wan (Seoul Gwang-nam Middle School)
Publication Information
대한공업교육학회지 / v.31, no.1, 2006 , pp. 86-109 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to reform the existing state of educational program for invention by TRIZ, theory of inventive problem solving. Major findings of the study were follows : First, students had a chance to get a inventive solution from the problem they were inventing. Second, the new educational program for invention was developed according to the procedures on the standpoint of pedagogy with the TRIZ. Third, according to the survey of the new educational program for invention has found that as follows: -Students were of help to know the invention, to be beneficial, but the basic concepts of TRIZ were not easy to them. -Student wished to advice their colleague the new program for invention, because they had chances to overcome a fixed idea, extend creativity and think. Fourth, TRIZ, the systematic method of problem solving for invention, provide students with the thinking method to overcome fixed ideas and the tool of knowledge.
Keywords
invention; TRIZ; inventive education; creativity; problem solving; technology education; industrial education; inventive education program;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김현수, 오국진(2005). 지속적인 창의적인 시스템, 서울:인터비젼
2 변영계, 이상수(2003). 수업설계. 서울:학지사
3 Boris Zlotin, Alla Zusman. (1999). TRIZ and Pedagogy. The Journal of TRIZ, http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/1999/10/g/index.htm. accessed at 2005. 8. 25
4 Herman, J. L., Ashchbacher, P. R. & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment Association for supervision and curriculum development. Virginia: Alexandria
5 Hutchinson, J., & Karsmitz, J. R. (1994). Design and problem solving in technology. Albany, NY: Delmar Publisher
6 Kalevi Rantanen & Ellen Domb. (2002). Simplified TRIZ, Florida: ST. LUICE PRESS
7 Custer, R. L. (1995). Examining the dimension of technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5(3), 219-244   DOI
8 김진화(2001). 평생교육 프로그램개발론. 서울:교육과학사
9 한국교육개발원(2002). 공교육 차원의 발명영재교육 체제구축 방안 연구, 연구보고서
10 성태제(2002). 현대교육평가. 서울:학지사
11 Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. MA: Allyn and Bacon
12 여상인, 강호감(2001). 과학영재교육센터 과학영재 교육 프로그램의 비교. 인천교육대학교 과학교육논총, 14, 131-155
13 Macpherson, R. T. (1997). The relationship among content knowledge, technical experience, cognitive styles, critical thinking skills, and near transfer troble shooting technological problem solving skills of maintenance technicians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia
14 김효준, 정진하, 권정휘(2004). 생각의 창의성: Theory of inventive problem solving. 서울: 도서출판 지혜
15 기영화(2001). 평생교육 프로그램개발. 서울:학지사
16 Feldhusen, J. F. & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative thinking and problem solving. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/ Hunt
17 Renzulli, J. S. (1977). Rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. G/C/T, 30-35