Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4333/KPS.2009.39.4.299

Pharmaceutical Data Exclusivity - Comparative Study and Future Direction in Korea  

Park, Syl-Vi-A (Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs)
Publication Information
Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation / v.39, no.4, 2009 , pp. 299-307 More about this Journal
Abstract
Data exclusivity is one of the most important intellectual property rights of pharmaceuticals. During data exclusivity period, third parties are prohibited from relying on the data which the original company has submitted to regulatory authority for drug application. I investigated data exclusivity systems for pharmaceuticals in the US, EU, Canada and Korea. New chemical entities were usually given the longest periods of data exclusivity compared to drugs with new indication or new formulation, although the protection periods varied by country. For new drugs to be entitled to a data exclusivity, strict conditions should be met. Data exclusivity has also been provided as an incentive to promote clinical investigation and drug development for pediatric population or orphan diseases. In Korea, data exclusivity was adopted in 1995 as an additive provision to "drug re-examination" which is to investigate post-marketing safety information of new drugs. It was introduced with few discussion on the purposes or effects of data exclusivity on pharmaceutical industry and pharmaceutical market in this country. I found that Korea's data exclusivity system falls short of considerations on valuing innovation of pharmaceutical research. It is necessary to improve data exclusivity system in order to promote innovative pharmaceutical development and to balance intellectual property rights protection and access to drugs in this country.
Keywords
pharmaceutical; data exclusivity; intellectual property rights;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 J.R. Sanjuan, US and EU protection of pharmaceutical test data. Consumer Project on Technology (2006)
2 K. Hoppu, A summary of the EU paediatric initiatives. WHO Expert Consultation on Essential Medicines for Children (2007)
3 C. McCourt, E. McMahon and I. VanderElst, Amendments to the patented medicines (notice of compliance) regulations and the data protection regulations are now in force. Torys LLP (2006)
4 J. Reichman, Undisclosed clinical trial data under the TRIPS agreement and its progeny: a broader perspective. UNCTAD-ICTSD Dialogue on Moving the pro-deveopment IP agenda forward: Preserving Public Goods in health, education and learning, Bellagio (2004)
5 J. Holding, Do orphan medicines benefit patients? The Pharmaceutical Journal, 280, 216-218 (2008).
6 C.M. Correa, Ownership of knowledge-implications of the role of the private sector in pharmaceutical R&D. In: J.A.Z Bermudez and M.A. Oliveria, Intellectual Property in the Context of the WTO TRIPS Agreement, Center for Pharmaceutical Policies. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2004)
7 International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations(IFPMA), Data exclusivity: encouraging development of new medicines (2007)
8 W.J. Rodriguez, R. Roberts and D. Murphy, Current regulatory policies regarding pediatric indications and exclusivity. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 37, S40-S45 (2003).   DOI   ScienceOn
9 E. Dickinson, FDA's role in making exclusivity determinations. Food and Drug Law Journal, 54, 195-203 (1999).
10 J.R. Sanjuan, J. Love and R. Weissman, Protection of pharmaceutical test data: a policy proposal. Consumer Project on Technology (2006)
11 http://ezdrug.kfda.go.kr/kfda2.