Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4333/KPS.2004.34.6.529

Guidance for Industry - Topical Dermatologic Corticosteroids: In Vivo Bioequivalence  

Jung, Sung-Hee (Division of Biopharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacology, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration)
Choi, Sun-Ok (Division of Biopharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacology, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration)
Um, So-Young (Division of Biopharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacology, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration)
Jung, Seo-Jeong (Division of Biopharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacology, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration)
Kim, Joo-Il (Division of Biopharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacology, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration)
Chung, Soo-Youn (Division of Biopharmaceutics, Department of Pharmacology, National Institute of Toxicological Research, Korea Food and Drug Administration)
Publication Information
Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation / v.34, no.6, 2004 , pp. 529-540 More about this Journal
Abstract
After new medical system of separation of dispensary from medical practice was started in 2000 in Korea, to expand bioequivalence-proven drug products and to ensure the credibility of the therapeutic equivalence of generic drugs are hot issues in Korea. It will be obligatory to submit bioequivalence reports for getting licenses of all generic prescription drugs in the near future. Like other countries such as US and Japan, the KFDA also has a plan to re-evaluate the already approved drugs by bioequivalence studies. Therefore, it becomes more necessary to develop bioequivalence-demonstrating methods for specific preparations such as topical drug products among already approved drug products. There are some differences between US and Japanese guidances of bioequivalence studies of generic drug products for topical use. The information on Japanese guidance and the guidance's Q&As is already provided in our previous paper. In this paper, we examined the US guideline published in 1995 and compared with the Japanese guideline, which will give a useful information to make a guidance on bioequivalence studies of topical drug products in Korea.
Keywords
Topical drug; Bioequivalence; Corticosteroids;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 局所皮膚通用製劑の後發醫藥品のための生物學的同等性試驗 かイドライン,日本國立醫藥品食品銜生硏究折(2003.7.7)
2 局所皮膚讀用製劑の後發醫藥品のための生物學的同等注試驗 かイドライン(Q&A),日本國立醫藥品衰品衛生硏究所(2003)
3 약사관계법령집 (2002)
4 생물학적동등성시험기준, 식품의양품안전청고시 제 2002-60호 (2002. 11. 22.)
5 S.O. Choi, S.H, lung, S.Y. Um, S.J lung, J.I. Kim and S.Y. Chung, Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies of GenericProducts for Topical Use, J Kor. Pharm. Sci., 34(4), 333-340. (2004)
6 Guidance for illdustry : Topical Dermatologic Corticosteroids : ill vivo Bioequivalence, US FDA (1995. 6. 2)
7 J. Tsai, C. Cheng, Y. Tsai, H. Sheu and C. Chou, Evaluation of in vivo bioequivalence methodology for topical clobestasol 17-propionate based on pharmacodynamic medeling using chinese skin, J. Pharm. Sci., 93(1), 207-217 (2004)   DOI   ScienceOn