Browse > Article

Recognition of Forest Certification by Consumption Propensity and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Wood Cabinet Consumers  

Shin, Hye-Jin (Dept. of Forest Environmental Resources, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National Univ.)
Kim, Eui-Gyeong (Div. of Environmental Forest Science, Gyeongsang National Univ.(Insti. of Agric. & Life Sci.))
Kim, Dong-Hyeon (Dept. of Forest Environmental Resources, Graduate School, Gyeongsang National Univ.)
Kim, Hyeon-Guen (Div. of Forest Economics, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of agriculture & life science / v.45, no.6, 2011 , pp. 57-63 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was performed to figure out the recognition on forest certification by consumption propensity and socio-economic characteristics of wood cabinet consumers. The mean score of recognition on SFM and FSC showed comparatively low, 2.25 and 2.20(5-point likert scale), from the analysis result on 88 valid questionnaires of 90. The respondents rate of eco and non eco-friendly group formed 80.7% and 18.2%, there is a significant gap between two groups on total questionnaires. The percentage of respondents recognizing on SFM and FSC was about 31% (eco-friendly), 5.6%(non eco-friendly, SFM) and 2.8%(non eco-friendly, FSC) within each group. It showed that the socio-economic characteristics on eco-friendly respondents were higher than the others about more 1.3 times in the married rate, average age and monthly householding income.
Keywords
Forest certification; Consumption propensity; Socio-economic characteristic;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ewarld R. and M. Simula. 2003. Forest certification-an instrument to promote sustainable forest management?. J. Environ. Manage. 67: 87-98.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 FSC. 2011. http://www.fsc.org.
3 Shin, H. J., E. G. Kim, B. I. Yoo, and J. W. Seo, 2010. Development of criteria and indicators for forest management certification in Korea. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 99: 24-35.
4 Virgilio M. V., R. P. Alan, and Richard Z.D. 1996. Certification of forest products: issues and perspectives. Island Press. Island Press. Washington, D.C. pp.253.
5 로하스인증 공식홍보사이트. 2011. LOHAS 가치를 추구하는 소비자의 특징. http://korealohas.or.kr.
6 산림포럼. 2008. 지속가능한 산림경영을 위한 산림인증제도의 국내외 현황과 자체 인증제도의 창설. pp.150.
7 서의훈. 2006. SPSS 12.0 한글판을 이용한 SPSS 통계분석. 자유아카데미. 파주. pp.500.
8 손철호. 2000. 지속적인 산림경영을 위한 산림인증제도(상). 산림. pp.8-15.
9 손철호. 2000. 지속적인 산림경영을 위한 산림인증제도(하). 산림. pp.12-18.
10 양병화. 2007. 다변량 자료분석의 이해와 활용. 학지사. 서울. pp.402.
11 이은영. 2005. 공동주택의 환경친화적 리모델링에 대한 거주자 의식 조사. 연세대학교 석사학위논문. pp.106.
12 이종환. 2009. 그린마케팅에 대한 소비자 태도에 관한 연구. 아주대학교 석사학위논문. pp.103.
13 정희석. 2004. 목재와 인류생활. 서울대학교출판부. 서울. pp.300.
14 차준희. 2003. 산림인증제에 대한 이해당사자들의 인식. 서울대학교 석사학위논문. pp.130.
15 한국목재신문. 2004. 21세기 목재문화운동의 추진방향. http://www.woodkorea.co.kr.