Browse > Article

Root Distribution in Natural Stand and Plantation of One-Age Class Pinus densiflora for. erecta  

Na, Sung-Joon (Dept. of Forest Resources, Yeongnam Univ.)
Kim, Jung-Hwan (Dept. of Forest Resources, Yeongnam Univ.)
Lee, Do-Hyung (Dept. of Forest Resources, Yeongnam Univ.)
Publication Information
Journal of agriculture & life science / v.45, no.5, 2011 , pp. 33-39 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to distribution characteristic of root diameter class between natural and planted stands of one-age class in Pinus densiflora for. eracta in Gangwon. Root development presented that 0.5-2.0 mm diameter class was large part in total root number and length but 0.5-2.0 mm diameter class have a low distribution in each stand. Below 5.0 mm diameter class between natural and planted stands observed outstanding natural stand more than planted stand, but reverse over 5.0 mm diameter class. Root development depending on soil level of vertical and horizontal was presented various natural stand more than planted stand because root distribution of planted stand was concentrated low soil level in 10 cm of soil depth and 20 cm of soil horizontal layer. We can understand that the root distribution presented different between natural and planted stand, therefore this result can used as a basic information for correct of outplanting.
Keywords
Pinus densiflora for. eracta; Natural stand; Planted stand; Root distribution of diameter class;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Abod, S. A. and A. D. Webster. 1991. The influence of root pruning on subsequent root and shoot growth of Malus, Tilia and Betula. J. Hort. Sci. 66: 227-233.
2 Aerts, R., C. Bakker, and H. de Caluwe. 1992. Root turnover as determinant of the C, N and P in a dry heathland ecosystem. Biogeochem. 15: 175-190.   DOI
3 Anderson, L., H. N. Rasmussen, and P. E. Brander. 2000. Regrowth and dry matter allocation in Quercus robur (L.) seedlings root pruned prior to transplanting. New Forests 119: 205-213.
4 Atkinson, D. and S. A. Wilson. 1980. The growth and distribution of fruit tree roots: some consequences for nutrient uptake, pp. 137-150. In: Atkinson, D., J. E. Jackson, R. O. Sharples, and W. M. Waller. (Eds) Mineral Nutrition of Fruit Trees. Butterworths, London.
5 Axelsson, E. and B. Axelsson. 1986. Changes in carbon allocation patterns in spruce and pine trees following irrigation and fertilization. Tree Physiol. 2: 189-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Bergman, F. and B. Haggstrom. 1976. Some important facts considering planting with rooted forest plants. For. Chron. 52: 266-273.   DOI
7 Bohm, W. 1979. Methods of studying root systems. Springer-Verlag. Berlin. 188 p.
8 Brantley, E. F. and W. H. Conner. 1997. Growth of root-pruned seedlings in a thermally impacted area of South Carolina. Tree Planters' Notes 48: 76-80.
9 Cuevas, E. and E. Medina. 1988. Nutrient dynamics within Amazonian forest II. Fine root growth, nutrient availability and leaf litter decomposition. Oecologia 76: 222- 235.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Eis, S. 1974. Root system morphology of western hemlock, western red cedar, and Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 4: 28-38.   DOI
11 Farmer, J. W. and S. R. Pezeshki. 2004. Effects of periodic flooding and root pruning on Quercus nuttallii seedlings. Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 12: 205- 214.   DOI
12 Fitter, A. H. 1985. Functional significance of root morphology and root system architecture. In Ecological interactions in soil, special publication of the British Ecological Society, No. 4. Fitter, A. H. (eds). Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.
13 Giardina, C. P., D. Binkley, M. G. Ryan, J. H. Fownes, and R. S. Senok. 2004. Belowground carbon cycling in a humid tropical forest decreases with fertilization. Oecol. 139: 545-550.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gower, S. T. 1987. Relationship between mineral nutrient availability and fine root biomass in two Costa Rican tropical wet forest: a hypothesis. Biotropica 19: 171-175.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Hulten, H. and K-Å. Jansson. 1978. Stability and root deformation of pine plants (Pinus silvestris). In: The Root Form of Planted Trees. Proc. Symp., 16-19 May 1978. Victoria, B.C., Canada. (Eds.) Van Eerden E. and Kinghorn J.M. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria. pp. 145-150.
16 Green, J. J., L. A. Dawson, J. Proctor, E. I. Duff, and D. A. Elston. 2005. Fine root dynamics in a tropical rain forest is influenced by rainfall. Plant Soil 276: 23-32.   DOI
17 Halter, M. R. and C. P. Chanway. 1993. Growth and root morphology of planted and naturally-regenerated Douglas-fir and Lodgepole pine. Ann. Sci. For. 50: 71-77.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Harrington, C. A., J. C. Brissette, and W. C. Carlson. 1989. Root system structure in planted and seeded Loblolly and Shortleaf pine. For. Sci. 35: 469-480.
19 Jensen, P. and S. Petterson. 1977. Effects of some internal and environmental factors on ion uptake efficiency in roots of pine seedlings. Swed. Conifer. For. Proj. Tech. Rep. 6: 1-19.
20 Lindgren, O. and G. Orlander. 1978. A study on root development and stability of 6-to-7-year old container plants. In The root form of planted trees. Proc. Symp., 16-19 May 1978. Victoria, B. C. Canada. (Eds.) Van Eerden E. and J. M. Kinghorn, British Columbia Ministry of Forests. Victoria. pp. 142-145.
21 Lindstrom, A. and G. Rune. 1999. Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: effects on root growth, tree stability and stem straightness. Plant and Soil 217: 29-37.   DOI
22 Nadelhoffer, K. J. and J. W. Raich. 1992. Fine root production estimates and below-ground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73: 1377- 1390.
23 Na, S. J., K. S. Woo, C. S. Kim, J. H. Yoon, H. H. Lee, and D. H. Lee. 2010. Comparison of above-ground growth characteristics between naturally regenerated and planted stands of Pinus densiflora for. erecta Uyeki in Gangwon Province. J. Korean For. Soc. 99: 323-330.
24 Nguyen, P. V., D. I. Dickmann, K. S. Pregitzer, and R. Hendrick. 1990. Late-season changes in allocation of starch and sugar to shoots, coarse roots, and fine roots in two hybrid poplar clones. Tree Physiol. 7: 95-105.   DOI
25 Savill, P. S. 1983. The effects of drainage and ploughing of surface water gleys on rooting and windthrow of Sitka spruce in Northern Ireland. Forestry 49: 133-141.
26 Philipson, J. J. 1978. Roots and root systems in tropical trees: morphologic and ecologic aspects. p. 323-349 In: Tropical trees as living systems. Tomlinson, P. B. and M. H. Zimmerman (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
27 Plourde, A., C. Krause, and D. Lord. 2009. Spatial distribution, architecture, and development of the root system of Pinus banksiana Lamb. in natural and planted stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 258: 2143-2152.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 SAS Institute Inc. 1999. Statistical Analysis system's User's Guide Basics, Version, 8.2 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
29 Sayer, E. J., E. V. J. Tanner, and A. W. Cheesman. 2006. Increased litterfall changes fine root distribution in a moist tropical forest. Plant Soil 281: 5-13.   DOI
30 Sutton, R. F. and R. W. Tinus. 1983. Root and root system terminology. Forest Sci. 29, 137 p.
31 Sundstrom, E. and M. Keane. 1999. Root architecture, early development and basal sweep in containerized and bare-rooted Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Plant and Soil 217: 65-78.   DOI
32 Uyeki, H. 1928. On the physiognomy of Pinus densiflora growing in Korea and silvicultural treatment of its improvement. Bull. Agr. For. Coll. Suwon, Korea. 263 p.
33 Yavitt, J. B. and S. J. Wright. 2001. Drought and irrigation effects on fine root dynamics in a tropical moist forest, Panama. Biotropica 33: 421-434.   DOI
34 Yu, E. J., T. H. Kim, and H. J. Lee. 2004. Aroma-active compounds of Pinus densiflora (red pine) needles. Flavour and Frag. J. 19: 532-537.   DOI   ScienceOn