Browse > Article

Analyzing the Type and Priority Order of Forest Functions for Private Forests  

Park, Young-Kyu (Warm Temperate Forest Research, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Roh, Hye-Jung (Div. of Forest Carbon Managment, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Jeon, Jun-Heon (Div. of Forest Carbon Managment, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Kim, Hyung-Ho (Div. of Environm. For. Sci. Gyeongsang National Univ.(Insti. Agric. & Life Sci.))
Publication Information
Journal of agriculture & life science / v.44, no.6, 2010 , pp. 51-59 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to analyze the type and priority order of forest functions that is suitable in assessing a private forest. A questionnaire survey of experts group and forest officers from the city and county office was conducted and the appropriateness of forest functions type and priority order of function were assessed. Based on the survey conducted, they mostly agreed that it is necessary to change the name of forest functions and integrate the forest functions. Four classifications of forest functions were presented: resources rotation, water yield, living environment, and forest conservation. As the variety of organizations and geographical areas determine which forest functions are the priority, it is necessary to determine which function will become the priority order according to geographical areas, instead of simply dividing the forest functions into national and publicly owned forest when assessing the forest functions of private forests across the nation.
Keywords
Forest functions; Questionnaire survey; Priority order; Private forest;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, H. H., J. S. Chung, and J. H. Kim. 2003. Analyzing The Relative Importance of Major Forest Environment Factors in Evaluating The Potential of Forest lands for Forest Functions. Journal of Korean Forest Society 92: 333-339.
2 Kwon, S. D., Y. K. Park, and E. H. Kim. 2008a. Study on Forest Functions Classification using GIS: Chunyang National Forest Management Planning. Journal of Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 11: 10-21.
3 Kwon, S. D., K. M. Jang, A. R. Seol, and J. S. Chung. 2008b. Evaluation of Forest Functions Considering the Distribution Patterns of Communal Forests at the Watershed Level. Journal of Korean Forest Society 97: 71-76.
4 Fuhrer, E. 2000. Forest functions, ecosystem stability and management. Forest Ecology and Management 132: 29-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Seo, O. H. J. C. Woo, J. Y. Jang, and H. K. Won. 2004. Development of a Computerized Application System for Efficient Private Forest Administration in Local Government(1). Korea Journal of Forest Economics 12: 23-35.
6 박영규, 권순덕, 이경학, 성규철, 김형호. 2006. 국유림 영림계획단위 산림기능구분도 작성. 국립산림과학원 연구보고 06-04.
7 산림청. 2009. 지속가능한 산림자원 관리지침. 훈령 제 1012로.
8 산림청. 2010a. 산림청 녹색성장 추진계획 및 주요업무 세부추진계획. p.142.
9 산림청. 2010b. 임업통계연보 40: 42-43.
10 정주상, 김의경, 이헌호, 신원섭. 1999. 산림기능평가에 관한 연구. 산림청. p.344.
11 채영암, 구자옥, 서학수, 이영만, 정승근. 2007. 신고 기초생물통계학. 향문사. p.370.
12 根布谷楨一. 2005. 森林計劃制度と森林の機能區分につて. 森林科學 43: 27-31.