Browse > Article

Comparison Study of the TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer 3321, Grimm Aerosol Spectrometer 1.109 and HCT Particle Sensor 3030 for PM2.5 measurement  

Kim, Du-Yong (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
Chung, Hyuck (HCT Co. Ltd.)
Park, Jae-Hong (University of Iowa, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health)
Hyun, Jun-Ho (Graduate Program in Clean Technology, Yonsei University)
Hwang, Jungho (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Particle and aerosol research / v.8, no.1, 2012 , pp. 9-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
Three different commercial particle counters were used to measure the PM2.5 particles in this study. An Aerosol Spectrometer (AS) 1.109 model of Grimm and a Particle Sensor (PS) 3030 model of HCT were compared with an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) 3321 model of TSI. The responses of these instruments were compared for four sizes ($1.0{\mu}m$, $1.5{\mu}m$, $2.0{\mu}m$ and $2.5{\mu}m$) of polystyrene latex (PSL) particles and indoor air particles of the office room. The mode diameter, particle size distribution and total particle number concentration of PSL particles were measured by each instrument. In the office room, the total particle number concentration was measured for 25 minutes. In results of particle size distribution and mode diameter, the APS 3321 (52 size-channels) was more accurate than the AS 1.109 (31 size-channels) and PS-3030 (10-szie channels) since the APS has more number of size-channels than the other instruments. However, AS 1.109 and PS-3030 provided similar results of total particle number concentration to those from the APS 3321. In results of office room test, there were no significant difference from each instrument similar to results of PSL test.
Keywords
Optical Particle Counter; PM2.5; Aerosol measurement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김신도 (2002) 미세먼지 규제와 영향, 공기청정기술지, 15(1), 19-28.
2 박영옥 (2002) 실내 생활공간에서의 미세먼지 오염 특성 및 제어 기술, 한국생활환경학회지, 9(2), 122-128.
3 환경부 (2004) 다중이용시설등의 실내공기질관리법 시행규칙.
4 환경부 (2010) 실내 공기 중 미세먼지 측정방법, 실내 공기질 공정시험기준, 67-82.
5 Bae, G.N., Lee, S.B., Mun, K.J., Choi, B.C., Choi, J.C., Park, K.J., and Ahn, J.E. (2004) Comparison of ambient aerosol size distributions observed by using an APS and two OPCs, proc. KOSAE, 37:97-98.
6 Burkart, J., Steiner, G., Moshammer, H., Neuberger, M., and Hitzenberger, R. (2010) Characterizing the performance of two optical particle counters(Grimm OPC1.108 and OPC 1.109) under urban aerosol conditions, Journal of Aerosol Science, 41(10), 953-962.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Hinds, W.C. (1999) Aerosol Technology 2nd Ed., A Wiley-interscience publication, 75-110, 233-259, 349-378.
8 Kim, Y.S. (1995) Health effect of indoor air polution, SAREK Magazine and ASHRAE Journal, 24(1), 29-32.
9 Mitsakou, C., Housiadas, C., Eleftheriadis, K., Vratolis, S, Helmis, C., and Asimakopoulos, D. (2007) Lung deposition of fine and ultrafine particles outdoors and indoors during a cooking event and a no activity period, Indoor Air, 17, 143-152.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Peters, T.M., and Leith, D. (2003) Concentration measurement and counting efficiency of the aerodynamic particle sizer 3321, Journal of Aerosol Science, 34, 627-634.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Peters, T.M., Ott, D., and O'shaughnessy, P.T. (2006) Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 Portable Aerosol Spectrometer to the TSI 3321 Aerodynamoc Particle Sizer for dry particles, Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 50(8), 843-850.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Shin D.C. (2007) Health effects of ambient particulate matter, Journal of Korean medical association, 50(2), 175-182.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 U.S. EPA (1998) Guidance for using continuous monitors in PM2.5 mornitoring networks, Office of Air Quality Planning and standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park.