Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.4.611

Self-adaptive sampling for sequential surrogate modeling of time-consuming finite element analysis  

Jin, Seung-Seop (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
Jung, Hyung-Jo (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Smart Structures and Systems / v.17, no.4, 2016 , pp. 611-629 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study presents a new approach of surrogate modeling for time-consuming finite element analysis. A surrogate model is widely used to reduce the computational cost under an iterative computational analysis. Although a variety of the methods have been widely investigated, there are still difficulties in surrogate modeling from a practical point of view: (1) How to derive optimal design of experiments (i.e., the number of training samples and their locations); and (2) diagnostics of the surrogate model. To overcome these difficulties, we propose a sequential surrogate modeling based on Gaussian process model (GPM) with self-adaptive sampling. The proposed approach not only enables further sampling to make GPM more accurate, but also evaluates the model adequacy within a sequential framework. The applicability of the proposed approach is first demonstrated by using mathematical test functions. Then, it is applied as a substitute of the iterative finite element analysis to Monte Carlo simulation for a response uncertainty analysis under correlated input uncertainties. In all numerical studies, it is successful to build GPM automatically with the minimal user intervention. The proposed approach can be customized for the various response surfaces and help a less experienced user save his/her efforts.
Keywords
surrogate modeling; Gaussian process model; self-adaptive sampling; sequential Bayesian framework; time-consuming FE analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bastos, L.S. and O'Hagan, A. (2009), "Diagnostics for Gaussian process emulators", Technometrics, 51(4), 425-438.   DOI
2 Bellman, R. (2003), Dynamic Programming, Dover Publications, Mineola, N.Y.
3 Box, G.E.P. and Behnken, D.W. (1960), "Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables", Technometrics, 2(4), 455-475.   DOI
4 Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G. and Hunter, J.S. (1978), Statistics for Experimenters : An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building, Wiley, New York.
5 Bucher, C. and Most, T. (2008), "A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 23(2-3), 154-163.   DOI
6 Bucher, C.G. and Bourgund, U. (1990), "A fast and efficient response-surface approach for structural reliability problems", Struct. Safety, 7(1), 57-66.   DOI
7 Dette, H. and Pepelyshev, A. (2010), "Generalized latin hypercube design for computer experiments", Technometrics, 52(4), 421-429.   DOI
8 DiazDelaO, F.A. and Adhikari, S. (2011), "Gaussian process emulators for the stochastic finite element method", Int. J. Numerical Meth. Eng., 87(6), 521-540.   DOI
9 Dubourg, V., Sudret, B. and Deheeger, F. (2013), "Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 33, 47-57.   DOI
10 Fang, K.T., Lin, D.K.J., Winker, P. and Zhang, Y. (2000), "Uniform design: Theory and application", Technometrics, 42(3), 237-248.   DOI
11 Forrester, A.I.J. and Keane, A.J. (2009), "Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization", Prog. Aerospace Sci., 45(1-3), 50-79.   DOI
12 Forrester, A.I.J., Sobester, A.S. and Keane, A.J. (2008), Engineering Design Via Surrogate Modelling : A Practical Guide, J. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, England ; Hoboken, NJ.
13 Friedman, J. H. (1991), "Multivariate adaptive regression splines", Annals of Statistics, 19(1), 1-67.   DOI
14 Goel, T., Haftka, R.T., Shyy, W. and Watson, L.T. (2008), "Pitfalls of using a single criterion for selecting experimental designs", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 75(2), 127-155.   DOI
15 Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M. and Welch, W.J. (1998), "Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions", J. Global Optim., 13(4), 455-492.   DOI
16 Gramacy, R.B. and Lee, H.K.H. (2012), "Cases for the nugget in modeling computer experiments", Statist. Comput., 22(3), 713-722.   DOI
17 Hyndman, R.J. and Koehler, A.B. (2006), "Another look at measures of forecast Accuracy", Int. J. Forecast., 22(4), 679-688.   DOI
18 Jones, D.R. (2001), "A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces", J. Global Optim., 21(4), 345-383.   DOI
19 Kennedy, M. C. and O'Hagan, A. (2001), "Bayesian calibration of computer models", J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B-Statistical Methodology, 63, 425-450.   DOI
20 Kiefer, J. and Wolfowitz, J. (1959), "Optimum designs in regression problems", Annals Mathematical Statist., 30(2), 271-294.   DOI
21 Kleijnen, J.P.C. and van Beers, W.C.M. (2004), "Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: Kriging metamodelling", J. Operational Res. Soc., 55(8), 876-883.   DOI
22 Krige, D.G. (1994), "A Statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand", J. South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 94(3), 95-111.
23 Mckay, M.D., Beckman, R.J. and Conover, W.J. (1979), "A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code", Technometrics, 21(2), 239-245.
24 Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., Van Liew, M.W., Bingner, R.L., Harmel, R.D. and Veith, T.L. (2007), "Model evaluation guidelines for systematic auantification of accuracy in watershed simulations", Transactions of the Asabe, 50(3), 885-900.   DOI
25 Xiong, Y., Chen, W., Apley, D. and Ding, X.R. (2007), "A non-stationary covariance-based kriging method for metamodelling in engineering design", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 71(6), 733-756.   DOI
26 Queipo, N.V., Haftka, R.T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R. and Tucker, P.K. (2005), "Surrogate-based analysis and optimization", Prog. Aerospace Sci., 41(1), 1-28.   DOI
27 Rougier, J., Sexton, D.M.H., Murphy, J.M. and Stainforth, D. (2009), "Analyzing the climate sensitivity of the Hadsm3 climate model using ensembles from different but related experiments", J. Climate, 22(13), 3540-3557.   DOI
28 Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P. (1983), "Design and analysis of computer experiments", Statist. Sci., 4(4), 409-423.   DOI
29 Ye, K.Q. (1998), "Orthogonal column latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments", J. American Statistical Association, 93(444), 1430-1439.   DOI
30 Zhang, Z., Jiang, C., Han, X., Hu, D. and Yu, S. (2014), "A response surface approach for structural reliability analysis using evidence theory", Adv. Eng. Software, 69, 37-45.   DOI