Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.5.1253

Damage detection based on MCSS and PSO using modal data  

Kaveh, Ali (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
Maniat, Mohsen (Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Smart Structures and Systems / v.15, no.5, 2015 , pp. 1253-1270 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper Magnetic Charged System Search (MCSS) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) are applied to the problem of damage detection using frequencies and mode shapes of the structures. The objective is to identify the location and extent of multi-damage in structures. Both natural frequencies and mode shapes are used to form the required objective function. To moderate the effect of noise on measured data, a penalty approach is applied. A variety of numerical examples including two beams and two trusses are considered. A comparison between the PSO and MCSS is conducted to show the efficiency of the MCSS in finding the global optimum. The results show that the present methodology can reliably identify damage scenarios using noisy measurements and incomplete data.
Keywords
damage detection; natural frequencies; mode shapes; beams; trusses; magnetic charged system search; particle swarm optimization;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Arumugam, M. and Rao, M. (2008), "On the improved performances of the particle swarm optimization algorithms with adaptive parameters, cross-over operators and root mean square (RMS) variants for computing optimal control of a class of hybrid systems", Appl. Soft Comput., 8(1), 324-336.   DOI
2 Carden, E. and Fanning, P. (2004), "Vibration based condition monitoring: a review", Struct. Health Monit., 3(4), 355-377.   DOI
3 S., Farrar, C. and Prime, M. (1998), "A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods", Shock Vib.Ddigest, 30(2), 91-105.   DOI
4 Esfandiari, A., Bakhtiari-Nejad, F., Rahai, A. and Sanayei, M. (2009), "Structural model updating using frequency response function and quasi-linear sensitivity equation", J. Sound Vib., 326(3), 557-573.   DOI
5 Fan, W. and Qiao, P. (2011), "Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study", Struct. Health Monit., 10(1), 83-111.   DOI
6 Friswell, M. and Mottershead, J. (2001), "Physical understanding of structures by model updating", Proceedings of the COST F3 International Conference on Structural System Identification.
7 Miguel, L., Miguel, L., Kaminski Jr, J. and Riera, J. (2012), "Damage detection under ambient vibration by harmony search algorithm", Expert Syst. Appl., 39(10), 9704-9714.   DOI
8 Parsopoulos, K. and Vrahatis, M. (2007), "Parameter selection and adaptation in unified particle swarm optimization", Math. Comput. Model., 46(1), 198-213.   DOI
9 Ratnaweera, A., Halgamuge, S. and Watson, H. (2004), "Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients", IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 8(3), 240-255.   DOI
10 Sahoo, B. and Maity, D. (2007), "Damage assessment of structures using hybrid neuro-genetic algorithm", Appl. Soft Comput ., 7(1), 89-104.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Shi, Y. and Eberhart, R. (2001), "Fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization", Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation.
12 Villalba, J. and Laier, J. (2012), "Localising and quantifying damage by means of a multi-chromosome genetic algorithm", Adv. Eng. Softw., 50, 150-157.   DOI
13 Yang, Q.W. and Liu, J.K. (2007), "Structural damage identification based on residual force vector", J. Sound Vib., 305(1), 298-307.   DOI
14 Kaveh, A., Share, M. and Moslehi, M. (2013), "Magnetic charged system search: a new meta-heuristic algorithm for optimization", Acta Mech., 224 (1), 85-107.   DOI
15 Friswell, M., Penny, J. and Garvey, S. (1998), "A combined genetic and eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structures", Comput. Struct., 69(5), 547-556.   DOI
16 Kaveh, A. (2014), Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures, Springer Verlag, Switzerland, May 2014.
17 Kaveh, A., Javadi, S.M. and Maniat, M. (2014), "Damage assessment via modal data with a mixed particle swarm strategy, ray optimizer, and harmony search", Asian J. Civil Eng., 15(1), 95-106.
18 Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A. (2015), "An improved CSS for damage detection of truss structures using changes in natural frequencies", Adv. Eng. Softw., 80, 93-100.   DOI
19 Kim, J.T., Ryu, Y.S., Cho, H.M. and Stubbs, N. (2003), "Damage identification in beam-type structures: frequency-based method vs mode-shape-based method", Eng. Struct., 25(1), 57-67.   DOI
20 Liszkai, T. and Raich, A. (2005), "Solving inverse problems in structural damage identification using advanced genetic algorithm representations", Proceeding of the 6th Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. ISSMO.
21 Maity, D. and Tripathy, R. (2005), "Damage assessment of structures from changes in natural frequencies using genetic algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., 19, 21-42.   DOI
22 Majumdar, A., Maiti, D. and Maity, D. (2012), "Damage assessment of truss structures from changes in natural frequencies using ant colony optimization", Appl. Math. Comput., 218(19), 9759-9772.   DOI   ScienceOn