Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.3.389

Optimal sensor placement for mode shapes using improved simulated annealing  

Tong, K.H. (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi)
Bakhary, Norhisham (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi)
Kueh, A.B.H. (Construction Research Centre, Universiti Teknologi)
Yassin, A.Y. Mohd (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi)
Publication Information
Smart Structures and Systems / v.13, no.3, 2014 , pp. 389-406 More about this Journal
Abstract
Optimal sensor placement techniques play a significant role in enhancing the quality of modal data during the vibration based health monitoring of civil structures, where many degrees of freedom are available despite a limited number of sensors. The literature has shown a shift in the trends for solving such problems, from expansion or elimination approach to the employment of heuristic algorithms. Although these heuristic algorithms are capable of providing a global optimal solution, their greatest drawback is the requirement of high computational effort. Because a highly efficient optimisation method is crucial for better accuracy and wider use, this paper presents an improved simulated annealing (SA) algorithm to solve the sensor placement problem. The algorithm is developed based on the sensor locations' coordinate system to allow for the searching in additional dimensions and to increase SA's random search performance while minimising the computation efforts. The proposed method is tested on a numerical slab model that consists of two hundred sensor location candidates using three types of objective functions; the determinant of the Fisher information matrix (FIM), modal assurance criterion (MAC), and mean square error (MSE) of mode shapes. Detailed study on the effects of the sensor numbers and cooling factors on the performance of the algorithm are also investigated. The results indicate that the proposed method outperforms conventional SA and Genetic Algorithm (GA) in the search for optimal sensor placement.
Keywords
optimal sensor placement; simulated annealing; coordinate-based solution coding;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Glover, F. and Laguna, M. (1989), "Tabu search - Part I", ORSA J. Comp., 1 190-206.   DOI
2 Cha, Y.J., Raich, A., Barosso, L. and Agrawal, A. (2011), "Optimal placement of active control devices and sensors in frame structures using multi‐objective genetic algorithms", Struct. Control Health Monit., 20(1), 16-44.
3 El-Borgi, S., Neifar, M., Cherif, F., Choura, S. and Smaoui, H. (2008), "Modal identification, model updating and nonlinear analysis of a reinforced concrete bridge", J.Vib. Control., 14(4), 511-530.   DOI
4 Furuya, H. and Haftka, R.T. (1996), "Combining genetic and deterministic algorithms for locating actuators on space structures", J. Spacecraft Rockets, 33(3), 422-427.   DOI
5 Glover, F. and Laguna, M. (1990), "Tabu search - Part II", ORSA J. Comp., 2 4-32.   DOI
6 Henshell, R.D. and Ong, J.H. (1974), "Automatic masters for eigenvalue economization", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 3(4), 375-383.   DOI
7 Kammer, D.C. (1990), "Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures" , Proceedings of the 19th American Control Conference, Califonia.
8 Kammer, D.C. and Yao, L. (1994), "Enhancement of on-orbit modal identification of large space structures 405 through sensor placement", J. Sound Vib., 171(1), 119-139.   DOI
9 Li, D.S., Li, H.N. and Fritzen, C.P. (2012), "Load dependent sensor placement method: theory and experimental validation", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 31(0), 217-227.   DOI
10 Kang, F., Li, J.J. and Xu, Q. (2008), "Virus coevolution partheno-genetic algorithms for optimal sensor placement", Adv. Eng. Inform., 22(3), 362-370.   DOI
11 Li, D.S., Li, H.N. and Fritzen, C.P. (2007), " The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement", J. Sound Vib., 305(4-5), 945-955.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Liu, W., Gao, W.C., Sun, Y. and Xu, M.J. (2008), "Optimal sensor placement for spatial lattice structure based on genetic algorithms", J. Sound Vib., 317(1-2), 175-189.   DOI
13 Liu, W., Hou, Z.K. and Demetriou, M.A. (2006), "A computational scheme for the optimal sensor and actuator placement of flexible structures using spatial measures", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 20(4), 881-895.   DOI
14 Meng, X., Dodson, A.H. and Roberts, G.W. (2007), "Detecting bridge dynamics with GPS and triaxial accelerometers", Eng. Struct., 29(11), 3178-3184.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Meo, M. and Zumpano, G. (2005), "On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure", Eng. Struct., 27(10), 1488-1497.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N. and Teller, A.H. (1953), "Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines", J. Chem. Phys., 26(6), 1087-1092.
17 Miki, M., Hiwa, S. and Hiroyasu, T. (2006), "Simulated annealing using an adaptive search vector", Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Syst., Bangkok.
18 Stephan, C. (2012), "Sensor placement for modal identification", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 27, 461-470.   DOI
19 Ponslet, E., Haftka, R.T. and Cudney, H.H. (1993), "Optimal placement of tuning masses on truss structures by genetic algorithms", Proceedings of the 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct., Structl. Dyn. and Mater. Conference, California.
20 Rao, A.R.M. and Anandakumar, G. (2007), "Optimal placement of sensors for structural system identification and health monitoring using a hybrid swarm intelligence technique", Smrt. Mater. Struct., 16(6), 2658-2672.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Salama, M., Rose, T. and Garba, J. (1987), "Optimal placement of excitation and sensors for verification of large dynamical systems", Proceedings of the 28th Struct., Structl. Dyn. and Mater. Conference, California.
22 Swann, C. and Chattopadhyay, A. (2006) "Optimization of Piezoelectric Sensor Location for Delamination Detection in Composite Laminates", Eng. Opt., 38(5),511-528.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Worden, K. and Burrows, A.P. (2001), "Optimal sensor placement for fault detection", Eng. Struct., 23(8), 885-901.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Xia, Y. and Hao, H. (2000), "Measurement selection for vibration-based structural damage identification", J. Sound Vib., 236(1), 89-104.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Yi, T.H., Li, H.N. and Zhang, X.D. (2012), "A modified monkey algorithm for optimal sensor placement in structural health monitoring", Smart Mater. Struct., 21(10), 105033.   DOI
26 Yu, T.K. and Seinfeld, J.H. (1973), "Observability and optimal measurement location in linear distributed parameter systems", Int. J. Control, 18(4), 785-799.   DOI
27 Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D. Jr and Vecchi, M.P. (1983), "Optimization by simulated annealing", Science, 220(4598), 671-680.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Guo, H.Y., Hang. L.Z., Zhang, L.L. and Zhou, J.X. (2004), "Optimal placement of sensors for structural health monitoring using improved genetic algorithms" , Smart Mater. Struct., 13(3), 528-534.   DOI   ScienceOn