Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.41.4.475

Mathematical sustainability assessment framework of earthquake-induced steel building population  

Seo, Junwon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State University)
Hatlestad, Alan J. (University of Wyoming)
Kimn, Jung-Han (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, South Dakota State University)
Hu, Jong Wan (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University)
Publication Information
Steel and Composite Structures / v.41, no.4, 2021 , pp. 475-485 More about this Journal
Abstract
The ability to estimate the probability a building population under seismic events will be sustainable is timely, useful in appropriately allocating earthquake mitigation funds earmarked for repair, rehabilitation, and replacement. A building population is considered sustainable if actual cost incurred is less than a target cost at a given ground motion intensity level such as a certain level of spectral accelerations. The purpose of this study is to construct a mathematical framework coupled with Gompertz and power functions to determine the probability of sustainability of building population subjected to seismic events as a function of target repair-cost ratios. The framework accounts for the exceedence probability of certain earthquake occurrence in 50 years and the fragility data created by joint response surface metamodels (RSMs) and Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). The fragility data for a population of L-shaped Steel Moment-Frame (LSMF) buildings located in the Central United States and the probability of spectral acceleration exceedence for the target region are used for this study. The probability of sustainability of the LSMF buildings built from pre-1970, between 1970 and 1990, and post-1990 are determined through the developed framework. The mathematical and graphical relationship between the probability of sustainability of the building population under a broad range of spectral accelerations and its target repair-cost ratio are determined. Key findings show that the buildings built in the post-1990 are more sustainable than those built from the pre-1970.
Keywords
mathematical functions; repair-cost ratio; response surface metamodels; seismic fragility curve; steel moment-frame building population; sustainability assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kia, M., Banazadeh, M. and Bayat, M. (2018), "Rapid seismic vulnerability assessment by new regression-based demand and collapse models for steel moment frames", Earthq. Struct., 14, 203-214. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.3.203.   DOI
2 Mangalathu, S., Jeon, J.S. and Jiang, J. (2019), "Skew adjustment factors for fragilities of California box-girder bridges subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motions", J. Bridge Eng., 24 (1), 04018109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001338.   DOI
3 Vandekerckhove, J., Matzke, D. and Wagenmakers, E.J. (2015), Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology, 300-319.
4 Werner, S., Jernigan, J.B., Taylor, C.E. and Hwang, H. (1995), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of highway systems", NCEER Bulletin, 9, 1-11.
5 Werner, S.D., Taylor, C.E., Cho, S., Lavoie, J.P., Huyck, C.K., Eitzel, C., Chung, H. and Eguchi, R.T. (2006), Redars 2 methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems.
6 Yilmaz, T. and Banerjee, S. (2018), "Impact spectrum of flood hazard on seismic vulnerability of bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 66(4), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.4.515.   DOI
7 Seo, J., Hatlestad, A.J., Kimn, J.H. and Hu, J.W. (2019), "Application of mathematical functions for seismic increment fragility determination", Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng., https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1665106.   DOI
8 Seo, J. and Linzell D. (2013), "Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges", Eng. Struct., 52, 642-653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.023.   DOI
9 Seo, J. and Linzell D. "Horizontally curved steel bridge seismic vulnerability assessment", Eng. Struct., 34, 21-32.   DOI
10 Seo, J., Rogers, L.P., Hu, J.W. (2018), "Computational seismic evaluation of a curved prestressed concrete I-girder bridge equipped with shape memory alloy", Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng., 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1492972.   DOI
11 Seo, J. and Park, H. (2017), "Probabilistic seismic restoration cost estimation for transportation infrastructure portfolios with an emphasis on curved steel I-girder bridges", Struct. Saf., 65, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.002.   DOI
12 Shiu, P. (1989), Power versus exponential. The Mathematical Gazette, 73, 25-28.   DOI
13 Song, L.L., Guo, T. and Shi, X. (2019), "Probabilistic seismic demand assessment of self-centering concrete frames under mainshock-aftershock excitations", Steel Compos. Struct., 33(5), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.5.641.   DOI
14 Taiyari, F., Mazzolani, F.M. and Bagheri, S. (2019), "Seismic performance assessment of steel building frames equipped with a novel type of bending dissipative braces", Steel Compos. Struct., 33(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.4.525.   DOI
15 Pinto, P.E. (2012), Probabilistic performance-based seismic design: Technical report, fib Federation internationale du beton.
16 Bayat, M. and Zahrai, S.M. (2017), "Seismic performance of mid-rise steel frames with semi-rigid connections having different moment capacity", Steel Compos. Struct., 25(1), 1-17.   DOI
17 Cornbleet, P.J. and Gochman, N. (1979), "Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis", Clinical Chem., 25(3), 432-438. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/25.3.432.   DOI
18 Petersen, M.D., Moschetti, M.P., Powers, P.M., Mueller, C.S., Haller, K.M., Frankel, A.D., Zeng, Y., RezaeianE, S., Harmsen, S. and Boyd, O. (2014), Documentation for the 2014 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps, Open-File Report 2014-1091. US Geological Survey.
19 Prestandared, F. (2000), commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA356). Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 7.
20 Rix, G. and Fernandes-Leon, J. (2004), Synthetic ground motions for Memphis, TN. Æ http://www.ce.gatech.edu/research/maegroundmotionae (Jul. 5, 2008).
21 Elnashai, A.S., Papanikolau, V. and Lee, D.H. (2011), "ZEUS Non-linear: A System for Inelastic", Analysis of Structures V1.9.0, UIUC, Urbana-Champaign, IL, .
22 Rogers, L.P. and Seo, J. (2017), "Vulnerability sensitivity of curved precast-concrete I-girder bridges with various configurations subjected to multiple ground motions", J. Bridge Eng., 22(2), 04016118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000973.   DOI
23 Seo, J., Duenas-Osorio, L., Craig, J.I. and Goodno, B. J. (2012), "Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events", Eng. Struct., 45, 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.003.   DOI
24 Braganca, L., Mateus, R. and Koukkar H. (2010), Building sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2.
25 Menon, A., Mehrotra, K., Mohan, C.K. and Ranka, S. (1996), "Characterization of a class of sigmoid functions with applications to neural networks", Neural Networks, 9(5), 819-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(95)00107-7.   DOI
26 Linzell, D.G. and Nadakuditi, V.P. (2011), "Parameters influencing seismic response of horizontally curved, steel, I-girder bridges", Steel Compos. Struct., 11(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2011.11.1.021.   DOI
27 Shinozuka, M., Feng, M., Kim, H., Uzawa, T. and Ueda, T. (2003), Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Report. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, MCEER-03-0002.
28 Berger, R. (1981), "Comparison of the gompertz and logistic equations to describe plant disease progress", Phytopathology, 71, 716-719.   DOI
29 Cramer, C.H., Gomberg, J.S., Schweig, E.S., Waldron, B.A. and Tucker, K. (2004), The Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee, Seismic Hazard Maps. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 4, 1294.
30 Dong, Y. and Frangopol, D.M. (2016a), "Performance-based seismic assessment of conventional and base-isolated steel buildings including environmental impact and resilience", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 45(5), 739-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2682.   DOI
31 Jeon, J.S., Mangalathu, S. and Lee, SY. (2019), "Seismic fragility curves for California concrete bridges with flared two-column bents", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 17(7), 4299-4319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00621-4.   DOI
32 Dukes, J., Mangalathu, S., Padgett, J.E. and DesRoches, R. (2018), "Development of a bridge-specific fragility methodology to improve the seismic resilience of bridges", Earthq. Struct., 15(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.3.253.   DOI
33 Liu, Z., Zhou, C. and Xue, J. (2019), "Study on seismic performance of steel frame with archaized-style under pseudo-dynamic loading", Earthq. Struct., 17(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.17.1.039.   DOI
34 Padgett, J.E. and Tapia, C. (2013), "Sustainability of natural hazard risk mitigation: Life cycle analysis of environmental indicators for bridge infrastructure", J. Infrastruct. Syst., 19(4), 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000138.   DOI
35 Dolce, M., Kappos, A., Masi, A., Penelis, G. and Vona, M. (2006). "Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies", Eng. Struct., 28(3), 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.009.   DOI
36 Dong Y., Frangopol, D.M. and Saydam, D. (2013), "Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 42(10), 1451-1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2281.   DOI
37 Dong, Y. and Frangopol D.M. (2016b), "Probabilistic timedependent multihazard life-cycle assessment and resilience of bridges considering climate change", J. Perform. Constr. Fac., 30(5), 04016034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000883.   DOI
38 Frangopol, D.M., Lin, K.Y. and Estes, A.C. (1997), "Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures", J. Struct. Eng., 123, 1390-1401. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1390).   DOI
39 Hamada, M. and Wu, J. (2000), Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization, Wiley New York.
40 Idels, L. (2008), Harvesting fisheries management strategies with modified effort function [pre-print].
41 Hwang, H.H. and Jaw, J.W. (1990), "Probabilistic damage analysis of structures", J. Struct. Eng., 116(7), 1992-2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:7(1992).   DOI
42 Hazus-MH, F. (2003), Flood Model: Technical Manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency.