Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2019.23.6.433

An efficient robust cost optimization procedure for rice husk ash concrete mix  

Moulick, Kalyan K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University)
Bhattacharjya, Soumya (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology)
Ghosh, Saibal K. (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology)
Shiuly, Amit (Department of Civil Engineering, Jadavpur University)
Publication Information
Computers and Concrete / v.23, no.6, 2019 , pp. 433-444 More about this Journal
Abstract
As rice husk ash (RHA) is not produced in controlled manufacturing process like cement, its properties vary significantly even within the same lot. In fact, properties of Rice Husk Ash Based Concrete (RHABC) are largely dictated by uncertainty leading to huge deviations from their expected values. This paper proposes a Robust Cost Optimization (RCO) procedure for RHABC, which minimizes such unwanted deviation due to uncertainty and provides guarantee of achieving desired strength and workability with least possible cost. The RCO simultaneously minimizes cost of RHABC production and its deviation considering feasibility of attaining desired strength and workability in presence of uncertainty. RHA related properties have been modeled as uncertain-but-bounded type as associated probability density function is not available. Metamodeling technique is adopted in this work for generating explicit expressions of constraint functions required for formulation of RCO. In doing so, the Moving Least Squares Method is explored in place of conventional Least Square Method (LSM) to ensure accuracy of the RCO. The efficiency by the proposed MLSM based RCO is validated by experimental studies. The error by the LSM and accuracy by the MLSM predictions are clearly envisaged from the test results. The experimental results show good agreement with the proposed MLSM based RCO predicted mix properties. The present RCO procedure yields RHABC mixes which is almost insensitive to uncertainty (i.e., robust solution) with nominal deviation from experimental mean values. At the same time, desired reliability of satisfying the constraints is achieved with marginal increment in cost.
Keywords
robust cost optimization; rice husk ash based concrete; moving least squares method; uncertainty; metamodeling;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Abbasnia, R., Shayanfar, M. and Khodam, A. (2014), "Reliability based design optimization of structural systems using a hybrid genetic algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., 52(6), 1099-1120. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.6.1099.   DOI
2 Abhiram, D.R., Ganguli, R., Harursampath, D. and Friedmann, P.P. (2018), "Robust design of small unmanned helicopter for hover performance using Taguchi method", J. Aircraft, 55(4), 1746-1753. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034539.   DOI
3 Beyer, H. and Sendhoff, B. (2007), "Robust optimization-A comprehensive survey", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 196(33-34), 3190-3218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.03.003.   DOI
4 Datta, G., Bhattacharjya, S. and Chakraborty, S. (2017), "Adaptive metamodel based efficient robust design optimization of offshore structure under stochastic wave loading", J. Struct. Eng., 44(3), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0362-3_37.
5 Myers, R.H. and Montgomery, D.C. (1995), Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product in Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
6 Bhattacharjya, S. and Chakraborty, S. (2011), "Robust optimization of structures subjected to stochastic earthquake with limited information on system parameter uncertainty", Eng. Optim., 43(12), 1311-1330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2011.554545.   DOI
7 Bhattacharjya, S., Banerjee, S. and Datta, G. (2018), "Efficient robust design optimization of rail bridge hollow pier considering uncertain but bounded type parameters in metamodeling framework", Asian J. Civil Eng., 19(6), 679-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0058-8.   DOI
8 Bhattacharjya, S., Chakraborti, S. and Das, S. (2015), "Robust optimization of reinforced concrete folded plate and shell roof structure incorporating parameter uncertainty", Struct. Eng. Mech., 56(5), 707-726. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.5.707.   DOI
9 Cheng, J., Liu, Z., Tang, M. and Tang, J. (2017), "Robust optimization of uncertain structures based on normalized violation degree of interval constraint", Comput. Struct., 182(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.10.010.   DOI
10 de Sensale, G.R. and Viacava, I.R. (2018), "A study on blended Portland cements containing residual rice husk ash and limestone filler", Constr. Build. Mater., 166(30), 873-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.113.   DOI
11 Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyariva, T. (2002), "A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II", IEEE Tran. Evol. Comput., 6(2), 182-197.   DOI
12 PWD WB (2017), Schedule of Rates, Public Works Department, Government of West Bengal, India.
13 Nunes, S., Milheiro-Oliveira, P., Coutinho, J. and Figueiras, J. (2013), "Robust SCC mixes through mix design", J. Mater. Civil Eng., 25(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000592.   DOI
14 Oti, J.E. and Kinuthia, J.M. (2015), "Development of stabilised brick and mortar using biomass waste", Pr. Inst. Civil Eng.- Constr. Mater., 168(5), 241-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.5.559.   DOI
15 Ozturk, M., Cansiz, O.F., Sevim, U.K. and Bankir, M.B. (2018), "MLR & ANN approaches for prediction of compressive strength of alkali activated EAFS", Comput. Concrete, 21(5), 559-567. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.21.5.559.   DOI
16 Suhendra B. (2014), "Towards green concrete for better sustainable environment", Procedia Eng., 95, 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.190.   DOI
17 Taflanidis, A.A. (2012), "Stochastic subset optimization incorporating moving least squares response surface methodologies for stochastic sampling", Adv. Eng. Softw., 44, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.07.009.   DOI
18 Venanzi, I., Materazzi, A.L. and Ierimonti, L. (2015), "Robust and reliable optimization of wind excited cable-stayed masts", J. Wind Eng. Indus. Aerodyn., 147, 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.07.011.   DOI
19 Ewa, D., Akeke, G.A. and Okoi, D. (2018), "Influence of rice husk ash source variability on road subgrade properties", Nigerian J. Technol., 37(3), 582-586.   DOI
20 Doltsinis, I., Kang, Z. and Cheng, G. (2005), "Robust design of non-linear structures using optimization methods", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 194, 1779-1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.02.027.   DOI
21 Gazder, U., Al-Amoudi, O.S.B., Khan, S.M.S. and Maslehuddin, M. (2017), "Predicting compressive strength of bended cement concrete with ANNs", Comput. Concrete, 20(6), 627-634. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.20.6.627.   DOI
22 Indian Standard (IS) 10262 (2009), Concrete mix proportioningguidelines, BIS, India
23 Indian Standard (IS) 1199 (1959), Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete, BIS, India.
24 Indian Standard (IS) 383 (1970), Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete, BIS, India.
25 Indian Standard (IS) 516 (1959), Methods of tests for strength of concrete, BIS, India.
26 Indian Standard (IS) 8112 (2013), Ordinary Portland Cement,43 Grade-Specification, BIS, India.
27 Indian Standard (IS) 9103-99 (2007), Specification For Concrete Admixtures, BIS, India.
28 Kim, C., Choi, K.K. and Wang, S. (2005), "Efficient response surface modeling by using moving least-square method and sensitivity", AIAA J., 43(11), 2404-2411.   DOI
29 Lee, K. and Park, G. (2001), "Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variable", Comput. Struct., 79(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00117-6.   DOI
30 Li, Z., Feng, W., Yang, J. and Huang, Y. (2018), "An investigation on modeling and compensation of synthetic geometric errors on large machine tools based on moving least squares method", Pr. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part-B, J. Eng. Manuf., 232(3), 412-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416645985.
31 MATLAB, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.