Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/was.2011.14.1.001

Wind loads for high-solidity open-frame structures  

Amoroso, Samuel D. (ENGENSUS, LLC)
Levitan, Marc L. (Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Louisiana State University)
Publication Information
Wind and Structures / v.14, no.1, 2011 , pp. 1-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
Open frame structures, such as those commonly found in industrial process facilities, are often densely occupied with process related equipment. This paper presents a method for estimating wind loads for high-solidity open frame structures that differs from current approaches, which accumulate wind load contributions from various individual structure components. The method considers the structure as a porous block of arbitrary plan dimension that is subject to wind from any direction. The proposed method compares favorably with wind tunnel test results for similar structures. The possibility of defining an upper bound force coefficient is also discussed.
Keywords
open frame structures; wind load; porous structure; force coefficient;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 Amoroso, S.D., Hebert, K. and Levitan, M.L. (2010), "Wind tunnel tests for mean wind loads on partially-clad structures", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 98(12), 689-700.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Andrade, J.S., Costa, U.M.S., Almeida, M.P., Makse, H.A. and Stanley, H.E. (1999), "Inertial effects on fluid flow through porous media", Phys. Rev. Lett., 82(26), 5249-5252.   DOI
3 ASCE (2006), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, SEI/ASCE 7-05 (ASCE Standard No. 7-05), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
4 ASCE (1997), Wind loads and anchor bolt design for petrochemical facilities, Task Committee on Wind Induced Forces and Task Committee on Anchor Bolt Design, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
5 Cook, N.J. (1990), The designer's guide to wind loading of building structures. Part 2. static structures, Building Research Establishment Report, Butterworths, London.
6 ESDU (1980), Blockage corrections for bluff bodies in confined flows, ESDU Data Item 80024, Engineering Sciences Data Unit, ESDU International, London, UK.
7 Georgiou, P.N. (1979), A Study of the wind loads on building frames, Masters Thesis, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
8 Georgiou, P.N. and Vickery, B.J. (1979), "Wind loads on building frames", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, July.
9 Letchford, C.W. (2001), "Wind Loads on rectangular signboards and hoardings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 89(2), 135-151.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Levitan, M.L., Qiang, L. and Amoroso, S.D. (2004), "Wind tunnel tests on open-frame industrial/petrochemical structures", Proceedings of the 5th International Colloquium on Bluff Body Aerodynamics and Applications, Ottawa, Canada, July.
11 Nadeem, A. and Levitan, M.L. (1997) "A refined method for calculating wind load combinations on openframed structures", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 72(1-3), 445-453.   DOI
12 Qiang, L. (1998), Wind tunnel tests for wind loads on open frame petrochemical structures, Masters Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
13 Richards, P.J. and Robinson, M. (1999), "Wind loads on porous structures", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 83, 455-465.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Standards Australia (2002), Structural design actions, Part 2: wind actions, Australian-New Zealand Standard, AS/NZS 1170.2:2002.
15 Seifert, J., Li, Y.G., Axley, J. and Rosler, M. (2006), "Calculation of wind-driven cross ventilation in buildings with large openings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 94(12), 925-947.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Yaragal, S.C., Ram, H.S.G. and Murthy, K.K. (2002), "Two-dimensional flow field behind perforated plates on a flat surface", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 90(2), 75-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Yaragal, S.C. (2004), "Unsteady 2-D flow field characteristics for perforated plates with a splitter", Wind Struct., 7(5), 317-332.   DOI