Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2022.83.1.093

Adaptive compensation method for real-time hybrid simulation of train-bridge coupling system  

Zhou, Hui M. (Engineering Seismic Research Center of Guangzhou University)
Zhang, Bo (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration)
Shao, Xiao Y. (Western Michigan University)
Tian, Ying P. (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration)
Guo, Wei (Central South University)
Gu, Quan (Xiamen University)
Wang, Tao (Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.83, no.1, 2022 , pp. 93-108 More about this Journal
Abstract
Real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) was applied to investigate the train-bridge interaction of a high-speed railway system, where the railway bridge was selected as the numerical substructure, and the train was physically tested. The interaction between the two substructures was reproduced by a servo-hydraulic shaking table. To accurately reproduce the high-frequency interaction responses ranging from 10-25Hz using the hydraulic shaking table with an inherent delay of 6-50ms, an adaptive time series (ATS) compensation algorithm combined with the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) was proposed and implemented in the RTHS. Testing cases considering different train speeds, track irregularities, bridge girder cross-sections, and track settlements featuring a wide range of frequency contents were conducted. The performance of the proposed ATS+LQG delay compensation method was compared to the ATS method and RTHS without any compensation in terms of residual time delays and root mean square errors between commands and responses. The effectiveness of the ATS+LQG method to compensate time delay in RTHS with high-frequency responses was demonstrated and the proposed ATS+LQG method outperformed the ATS method in yielding more accurate responses with less residual time delays.
Keywords
ATS+LQG; high-frequency signals; RTHS; time delay compensation; train-bridge coupling system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Guo, W., Gao, X., Hu, P., Hu, Y., Bu, D. and Jiang, L. (2020), "Seismic damage features of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under near-fault earthquake", Adv. Struct. Eng., 23, 1573-1586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219896166.   DOI
2 Guo, W., Zeng, C., Gou, H., Hu, Y., Xu, H. and Guo, L. (2019), "Rotational friction damper's performance for controlling seismic response of high speed railway bridge-track system", Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 120, 491-515. https://doi.org/10.32604/2019.06162.   DOI
3 Hayati, S. and Song, W. (2017), "An optimal discrete-time feedforward compensator for real-time hybrid simulation", Smart Struct. Syst., 20(4), 483-498. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.4.483.   DOI
4 Iwnicki, S. (2006), Handbook of Railway Vehicle Dynamics, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
5 Horiuchi, T., Inoue, M., Konno, T. and Namita, Y. (1999), "Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 1121-1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1121::AID-EQE858>3.0.   DOI
6 Gao, X., Castaneda, N.E. and Dyke, S.J. (2013), "Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(6), 815-832. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2246.   DOI
7 Silva, C.E., Gomez, D., Maghareh, A., Dyke, S.J. and Spencer, Jr. B.F. (2020), "Benchmark control problem for real-time hybrid simulation", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 135(1), 106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106381.   DOI
8 Ou, G., Ozdagli, A.I., Dyke, S.J. and Wu, B. (2015), "Robust integrated actuator control: Experimental verification and real-time hybrid-simulation implementation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(3), 441-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2479.   DOI
9 Guo, W., Zeng, C., Gou, H., Gu, Q., Wang, T., Zhou, H., Zhang, B. and Wu, J. (2021), "Real-time hybrid simulation of high-speed train-track-bridge interactions using the moving load convolution integral method", Eng. Struct., 228, 111537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111537.   DOI
10 Sarebanha, A., Schellenberg, A.H., Schoettler, M.J., Mosqueda, G. and Mahin, S.A. (2019), "Real-time hybrid simulation of seismically isolated structures with full-scale bearings and large computational models", Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 120(3), 693-717. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2019.04846.   DOI
11 Stoten, D.P., Yamaguchi, T. and Yamashita, Y. (2016), "Dynamically substructured system testing for railway vehicle pantographs", J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 744(1), 012204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/744/1/012204.   DOI
12 The MathWorks Inc. (2014), Simulink and xPC Target Natick, Massachusetts.
13 Tian, Y., Zhou, H. and Wang, T. (2020), "Reproduction of the wind and earthquake coupled effect on a wind turbine tower in a shaking-table substructure test", Int. J. Lifecyc. Perform. Eng., 4(1-3), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLCPE.2020.10031039.   DOI
14 Wang, Z., Xu, G., Li, Q. and Wu, B. (2020), "An adaptive delay compensation based on a discrete system model for real-time hybrid simulation", Smart Struct. Syst., 25(5), 569-580. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2020.25.5.569.   DOI
15 Philips, B.M. and Spencer, B.F. (2011), "Model-based feedforward-feedback tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation", NSEL Report Series, Report No. 028, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana.
16 Kobayashi, S., Yamashita, Y. and Usuda, T. and Stoten, D.P. (2020), "Hybrid simulation testing of a pantograph-catenary system using a dynamically substructured system framework and a MDOF catenary model", Quart. Report of RTRI, 61(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.61.2_127.   DOI
17 Luo, P. and Zeng, Q. (2005), "Formulation of equations of motion of finite element form for vehicle-track-bridge interaction system with two types of vehicle model", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 62, 435-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1207.   DOI
18 Nakashima, M., Kato, H. and Takaoka, E. (1992), "Development of real-time pseudo-dynamic testing", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21, 779-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210106.   DOI
19 Servotest systems Inc. (2020), https://www.servotestsystems.com/images/PDFs/ST_brochures/Servotest_Pulsar_concept_brochure.pdf.
20 The MathWorks Inc. (2014), MATLAB, Version 8.3 Natick, Massachusetts.
21 Chen, C., Ricles, J.M. and Guo, T. (2012), "Improved adaptive inverse compensation technique for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation", J. Eng. Mech., 138(12), 1432-1446. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000450.   DOI
22 Alejandro, P. and Mariantonieta, G.S. (2019), "Adaptive tracking control for real-time hybrid simulation of structures subjected to seismic loading", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 134(12), 106345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106345.   DOI
23 Chae, Y., Kazemibidokhti, K. and Ricles, J.M. (2013), "Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo-hydraulic actuator systems for real-time hybrid simulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(11), 1697-1715. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2294.   DOI
24 Chae, Y., Rabiee, R., Dursun, A. and Kim, C.Y. (2018), "Real-time force control for servo-hydraulic actuator systems using adaptive time series compensator and compliance springs", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47, 854-871. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2994.   DOI
25 Fermandois-Cornejo, G. and Spencer, B.F. (2017), "Model-based framework for multi-axial real-time hybrid simulation testing", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 16(4), 671-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0407-8.   DOI
26 Guo, W., Wang, Y., Zeng, C., Wang, T., Gu, Q., Zhou, H., Zhou, L. and Hou, W. (2022), "Moving safety evaluation of high-speed train on post-earthquake bridge utilizing real-time hybrid simulation", J. Earthq. Eng., 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1999869.   DOI
27 Wallace, M.I., Wagg, D.J. and Neild, S.A. (2005), "An adaptive polynomial based forward prediction algorithm for multi-actuator real-time dynamic substructuring", Proc. R. Soc. A, 461(2064), 3807-3826. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2005.1532.   DOI
28 Schellenberg, A.H., Mahin, S.A. and Fenves, G.L. (2009), "Advanced implementation of hybrid simulation", Tech. Rep. 2009/104, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
29 Watanabe, N. and Sasaki, K. (2012), "Fundamental tests on a rapid prototype bogie", Quart. Report RTRI, 53(4), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.53.199.   DOI
30 Watanabe, N. and Stoten, D.P. (2016), "Actuator control for a rapid prototyping railway bogie, using a dynamically substructured systems approach", Quart. Report RTRI (Railw. Techn. Res. Inst.), 57, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.57.2_90.   DOI
31 Zhou, H., Wagg, D.J. and Li, M. (2017), "Equivalent force control combined with adaptive polynomial-based forward prediction for real-time hybrid simulation", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 24(11), e2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2018.   DOI
32 Zhou, H., Xu, D., Shao, X., Ning, X. and Wang, T. (2019), "A robust linear-quadratic-gaussian controller for the real-time hybrid simulation on a benchmark problem", Mech. Eng. Signal Pr., 133(1), 106260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106260.   DOI
33 Fedorova, M. and Sivaselvan, M. (2017), "An algorithm for dynamic vehicle-track-structure interaction analysis for high-speed trains", Eng. Struct., 148, 857-877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.05.065.   DOI
34 Williams, D.M., Williams, M.S. and Blakeborough, A. (2001), "Numerical modelling of a servo-hydraulic testing system for structures", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 127(8), 816-827. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:8(816).   DOI
35 Wu, B., Wang, Z. and Bursi, O.S. (2013), "Actuator dynamics compensation based on upper bound delay for real-time hybrid simulation", Earthq. Eng Struct. Dyn., 42(12), 1749-1765. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2296.   DOI
36 Wagg, D.J. and Stoten, D.P. (2001), "Substructuring of dynamical systems via the adaptive minimal control synthesis algorithm", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(6), 865-877. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.44.   DOI
37 Kobayashi, S., Stoten, D.P., Yamashita, Y. and Usuda, T. (2019), "Dynamically substructured testing of railway pantograph/catenary systems", Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Trans., 233, 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409718799900.   DOI
38 Mathworks (2003), Simulink and xPC Target.
39 National Railway Administration of People's Republic of China (2014), PSD of Ballastless Track Irregularities of High Speed Railway, China Railway Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)