Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.2.247

Analytic solution of Timoshenko beam excited by real seismic support motions  

Kim, Yong-Woo (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sunchon National University)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.62, no.2, 2017 , pp. 247-258 More about this Journal
Abstract
Beam-like structures such as bridge, high building and tower, pipes, flexible connecting rods and some robotic manipulators are often excited by support motions. These structures are important in machines and structures. So, this study proposes an analytic method to accurately predict the dynamic behaviors of the structures during support motions or an earthquake. Using Timoshenko beam theory which is valid even for non-slender beams and for high-frequency responses, the analytic responses of fixed-fixed beams subjected to a real seismic motions at supports are illustrated to show the principled approach to the proposed method. The responses of a slender beam obtained by using Timoshenko beam theory are compared with the solutions based on Euler-Bernoulli beam theory to validate the correctness of the proposed method. The dynamic analysis for the fixed-fixed beam subjected to support motions gives useful information to develop an understanding of the structural behavior of the beam. The bending moment and the shear force of a slender beam are governed by dynamic components while those of a stocky beam are governed by static components. Especially, the maximal magnitudes of the bending moment and the shear force of the thick beam are proportional to the difference of support displacements and they are influenced by the seismic wave velocity.
Keywords
Timoshenko beam; support motions; eigenfunction expansion method; time-dependent boundary condition; quasi-static decomposition method; static component-dominated beam;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Abdel-Ghaffar, A.M. and Rood, J.D. (1982), "Simplified earthquake analysis of suspension bridge towers", J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, 108(EM2), 291-302.
2 Blevins, R.D. (1979), Formulas for Natural Frequency and Mode Shape, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York. NY, USA.
3 Chen, J.T., Hong, H.K., Yeh, C.S. and Chyuan, S.W. (1996), "Integral representations and regularizations for a divergent series solution of a beam subjected to support motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25, 909-925.   DOI
4 Chopra, A.K. (1995), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, USA.
5 Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1993), Dynamics of Structures, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
6 Datta, T.K. (2010), Seismic Analysis of Structures, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore.
7 Diaz-de-Anda, A., Flores, J., Gutierrez, L., Mendez-Sanchez, R.A. and Monsivais, G. (2012), "Experimental study of the Timoshenko beam theory predictions", J. Sound Vib., 331, 5732-5744.   DOI
8 Fryba, L. and Yau, J.D. (2009), "Suspended bridges subjected to moving loads and support motions due to earthquake", J. Sound Vib., 319, 218-227.   DOI
9 Han, S.M., Benaroya, H. and Wei, T. (1999), "Dynamics of transversely vibrating beams using four engineering theories", J. Sound Vib., 225(3), 935-988.   DOI
10 Kim, Y.W. (2015), "Finite element formulation for earthquake analysis of single-span beams involving forced deformation caused by multi-support motions", J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 29(2), 461-469.   DOI
11 Li, X.Y., Zhao, X. and Li, Y.H. (2014), "Green's function of the forced vibration of Timoshenko beams with damping effect", J. Sound Vib., 333, 1781-1795.   DOI
12 Kim, Y.W. (2016), "Dynamic analysis of Timoshenko beam subjected to support motions", J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 30(2), 4167-4176.   DOI
13 Kim, Y.W. and Jhung, M.J. (2013), "Moving support elements for dynamic finite element analysis of statically determinate beams subjected to support motions", Tran. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng. A, 37(4), 555-567.   DOI
14 Lee, S.Y. and Lin, S.M. (1998), "Non-uniform Timoshenko beams with time-dependent elastic boundary conditions", J. Sound Vib., 217(9), 223-238.   DOI
15 Mindlin, R.D. and Goodman, L.E. (1950), "Beam vibrations with time-dependent boundary conditions", J. Appl. Mech., ASME, 17, 377-380.
16 Liu, M.F., Chang, T.P. and Zeng, D.Y. (2011), "The interactive vibration in a suspension bridge system under moving vehicle loads and vertical seismic excitations", Appl. Math. Model., 35, 398-411.   DOI
17 Majkut, L. (2009), "Free and forced vibrations of Timoshenko beams described by single difference equation", J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 47(1), 193-210.
18 Masri, S.F. (1976), "Response of beam to propagating boundary excitation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 4, 497-509.   DOI
19 Stephen, N.G. and Puchegger, S. (2006), "On valid frequency range of Timoshenko beam theory", J. Sound Vib., 297, 1082-1087.   DOI
20 van Rensburg, N.F.J. and van der Merwe, A.J. (2006), "Natural frequencies and modes of a Timoshenko beam", Wave Motion, 44, 58-69.   DOI
21 Zhang, Y.H., Li, Q.S., Lin, J.H. and Williams, F.W. (2009), "Random vibration analysis of long-span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 29, 620-629.   DOI
22 Yau, J.D. (2009), "Dynamic response analysis of suspended beams subjected to moving vehicles and multiple support excitations", J. Sound Vib., 325, 907-922.   DOI
23 Yau, J.D. and Fryba, L. (2007), "Response of suspended beams due to moving loads and vertical seismic ground excitations", Eng. Struct., 29, 3255-3262.   DOI