Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.53.2.249

Structural damage detection including the temperature difference based on response sensitivity analysis  

Wei, J.J. (Department of Construction Engineering, Changzhou Institute of Engineering Technology)
Lv, Z.R. (Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.53, no.2, 2015 , pp. 249-260 More about this Journal
Abstract
Damage detection based on a reference set of measured data usually has the problem of different environmental temperature in the two sets of measurements, and the effect of temperature difference is usually ignored in the subsequent model updating. This paper attempts to identify the structural damage including the temperature difference with artificial measurement noise. Both local damages and the temperature difference are identified in a gradient-based model updating method based on dynamic response sensitivity. The sensitivities of dynamic response with respect to the system parameters and temperature difference are calculated by direct integration method. The measured dynamic responses of the structure from two different states are used directly to identify the structural local damages and the temperature difference. A single degree-of-freedom mass-spring system and a planar truss structure are studied to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Keywords
response sensitivity; damage detection; model updating; temperature difference;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cattarius, J. and Inman, D.J. (1997), "Time domain analysis for damage detection in smart structures", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 11, 409-423.   DOI
2 Cawley, P. and Adams, R.D. (1979), "The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies", J. Strain Anal., 14, 49-57.   DOI
3 Deobling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B. and Shevitz, D.W. (1998), "A review of damage identification methods that examine changes in dynamic properties", Shock Vib. Dig., 30, 91-105.   DOI
4 Doebling, S.W., Peterson, L.D. and Alvin, K.F. (1996), "Estimation of reciprocal residual flexibility from experimental modal data", Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 34, 1678-1685.   DOI
5 Friswell, M.I. and Mottershead, J.E. (1995), Finite element model updating in structural dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6 Friswell, M.I. and Mottershead, J.E. (2001), "Inverse methods in structural health monitoring", DAMAS 2001: 4th International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures, Cardiff, 201-210.
7 Hadjileontiadis, L.J., Douka, E. and Trochidis, A. (2005), "Fractal dimension analysis for crack identification in beam structures", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 19, 659-674.   DOI
8 Hansen, P.C. (1992), "Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve", SIAM Rev., 34, 561-580.   DOI
9 He, Z.Y. and Lu, Z.R. (2010), "Time domain identification of multiple cracks in a beam", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42, 13-24.
10 Housner, G.W. et al. (1997), "Structural control: Past, present, and future", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 123(9), 897-971.   DOI
11 Jaishi, B. and Ren, W.X. (2006), "Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual", J. Sound Vib., 290, 369-387.   DOI
12 Koh, C.G., Hong, B. and Liaw, C.Y. (2000), "Parameter identification of large structural systems in time domain", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 126, 957-963.   DOI
13 Lu, Z.R. and Law, S.S. (2007), "Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection", J. Sound Vib., 303, 305-329.   DOI
14 Lu, Z.R. and Liu, J.K. (2011), "Identification of both damages and parameters of vehicles for bridge-vehicle system from measured dynamic responses", Comput. Struct., 89, 1397-1405.   DOI
15 Pandey, A.K. and Biswas, M. (1994), "Damage detection in structures using change in flexibility" J. Sound Vib., 169, 3-17.   DOI
16 Lu, X.B., Liu, J.K. and Lu, Z.R. (2013), "A two-step approach for crack identification in beam", J. Sound Vib., 332(2), 282-293.   DOI
17 Majumdar, A. et al. (2013), "Damage assessment of beams from changes in natural frequencies using ant colony optimization", Struct. Eng. Mech., 45, 391-410.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Majumder, L. and Manohar, C.S. (2003), "A time domain approach for damage detection in beam structures using vibration data with a moving oscillator as an excitation source", J. Sound Vib., 268, 699-716.   DOI
19 Pandey, A.K., Biswas, M. and Samman, M.M. (1991), "Damage detection from change in curvature mode shapes", J. Sound Vib., 145, 321-332.   DOI
20 Salawu, O.S. (1997), "Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: A review", Eng. Struct., 19(9), 718-723.   DOI
21 Urgessa, G.S. (2011), "Vibration properties of beams using frequency-domain system identification methods", J. Vib. Control, 17(9), 1287-1294.   DOI
22 Wang, B.S. and He, Z.C. (2007), "Crack detection of arch dam using statistical neural network based on the reductions of natural frequencies", J. Sound Vib., 302, 1037-1047.   DOI
23 Wang, H. and Qiao, P. (2008), "On irregularity-based damage detection method for cracked beams", Int. J. Solid. Struct., 45, 688-704.   DOI
24 Wu, D. and Law, S.S. (2004), "Model error correction from truncated modal flexibility sensitivity and generic parameters. I: Simulation", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 18, 1381-1399.   DOI
25 Zou, T., Tong, L. and Steve, G.P. (2000), "Vibration based model-dependent damage (delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures- a review", J. Sound Vib., 230(2), 357-378.   DOI
26 Tikhonov, A.M. (1963), "On the solution of ill-posed problems and the method of regularization", Soviet Math., 4, 1035-1038.
27 Yang, Q.W. (2011), "A new damage identification method based on structural flexibility disassembly". J. VibVib . Control, 17(7), 1000-1008.   DOI