Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.5.589

Contact forces generated by fallen debris  

Sun, Jing (Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne)
Lam, Nelson (Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne)
Zhang, Lihai (Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne)
Gad, Emad (Faculty of Engineering & Industrial Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology)
Ruan, Dong (Faculty of Engineering & Industrial Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.50, no.5, 2014 , pp. 589-603 More about this Journal
Abstract
Expressions for determining the value of the impact force as reported in the literature and incorporated into code provisions are essentially quasi-static forces for emulating deflection. Quasi-static forces are not to be confused with contact force which is generated in the vicinity of the point of contact between the impactor and target, and contact force is responsible for damage featuring perforation and denting. The distinction between the two types of forces in the context of impact actions is not widely understood and few guidelines have been developed for their estimation. The value of the contact force can be many times higher than that of the quasi-static force and lasts for a matter of a few milli-seconds whereas the deflection of the target can evolve over a much longer time span. The stiffer the impactor the shorter the period of time to deliver the impulsive action onto the target and consequently the higher the peak value of the contact force. This phenomenon is not taken into account by any contemporary codified method of modelling impact actions which are mostly based on the considerations of momentum and energy principles. Computer software such as LS-DYNA has the capability of predicting contact force but the dynamic stiffness parameters of the impactor material which is required for input into the program has not been documented for debris materials. The alternative, direct, approach for an accurate evaluation of the damage potential of an impact scenario is by physical experimentation. However, it can be difficult to extrapolate observations from laboratory testings to behaviour in real scenarios when the underlying principles have not been established. Contact force is also difficult to measure. Thus, the amount of useful information that can be retrieved from isolated impact experiments to guide design and to quantify risk is very limited. In this paper, practical methods for estimating the amount of contact force that can be generated by the impact of a fallen debris object are introduced along with the governing principles. An experimental-calibration procedure forming part of the assessment procedure has also been verified.
Keywords
quasi-static force; contact force; material dynamic stiffness; impact action; fallen debris;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Heimbs, S., Heller, S., Middendorf, P., Hahnel, F. and Weisse, J. (2009), "Low velocity impact on CFRP plates with compressive preload: Test and modelling", Int. J. Impact Eng., 36(10-11), 1182-1193.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Sjoblom, P.O., Hartness, J.T. and Cordell, T.M. (1988), "On low-velocity impact testing of composite materials", J. Compos. Mater., 22(1), 30-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Zineddin, M. and Krauthammer, T. (2007), "Dynamic response and behavior of reinforced concrete slabs under impact loading", Int. J. Impact Eng., 34(9), 1517-1534.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Crisco, J.J., Hendee, S.P. and Greenwald, R.M. (1997), "The influence of baseball modulus and mass on head and chest impacts: a theoretical study", Med. Sci. Sport. Exer., 29(1), 26-36.
5 Cheng, N., Takla, M. and Subic, A. (2011), "Development of an FE model of a cricket ball", Procedia Eng., 13, 238-245.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Day, J. and Bala, S. (2006), General guidlines for crash analysis in LS-DYNA, Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
7 Yang, Y. (2013), "Modelling impact actions of spherical objects", PhD thesis, Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Melbourne.
8 Machado, M., Moreira, P., Flores, P. and Lankarani, H.M. (2012) "Compliant contact force models in multibody dynamics: Evolution of the Hertz contact theory", Mech. Mach. Theo., 53, 99-121.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 British Standard Institute (2008), Eurocode 1 - Actions on structures - Part 1 - 7: General actions - accidental 602 actions (S.P. Committee, Ed.), European Committee for Standardization, London.
10 Ali, M., Sun, J., Lam, N.T.K., Zhang, L.H. and Gad, E.F., "Estimation of impact generated deflection of beam by hand calculation method", Aus. J. Struct. Eng., Article No.S-13-006.
11 Lam, N.T.K., Tsang, H.H. and Gad, E.F. (2010), "Simulations of response to low velocity impact by spreadsheet", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 10(3), 483-499.   DOI
12 Mark, A.L. and Stephen, J.S. (2011), Applications of Spreadsheets in Education-the Amazing Power of a Simple Tool, Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
13 Yang, Y., Lam, N.T.K. and Zhang, L.H. (2012a), "Estimation of response of plate structure subject to low velocity impact by a solid object", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 12(6), 1250053.   DOI
14 Smith, L.V. (2001), "Evaluating baseball bat performance", Sport. Eng., 4(4), 205-214.   DOI
15 Yang, Y., Lam, N.T.K. and Zhang, L.H. (2012b), "Evaluation of simplified methods of estimating beam responses to impact", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 12(3), 1250016.   DOI
16 Nguyen, M.Q., Jacombs, S.S., Thomson, R.S., Hachenberg, D. and Scott, M.L. (2005), "Simulation of impact on sandwich structures", Compos. Struct., 62(2), 217-227.
17 Nicholls, R.L., Miller, K. and Elliott, B.C. (2006), "Numerical analysis of maximal bat performance in baseball", J. Biomech., 39(6), 1001-1009.   DOI   ScienceOn