Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.5.663

Influence of ground motion spatial variations and local soil conditions on the seismic responses of buried segmented pipelines  

Bi, Kaiming (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, The University of Western Australia)
Hao, Hong (School of Civil and Resource Engineering, The University of Western Australia)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.44, no.5, 2012 , pp. 663-680 More about this Journal
Abstract
Previous major earthquakes revealed that most damage of the buried segmented pipelines occurs at the joints of the pipelines. It has been proven that the differential motions between the pipe segments are one of the primary reasons that results in the damage (Zerva et al. 1986, O'Roueke and Liu 1999). This paper studies the combined influences of ground motion spatial variations and local soil conditions on the seismic responses of buried segmented pipelines. The heterogeneous soil deposits surrounding the pipelines are assumed resting on an elastic half-space (base rock). The spatially varying base rock motions are modelled by the filtered Tajimi-Kanai power spectral density function and an empirical coherency loss function. Local site amplification effect is derived based on the one-dimensional wave propagation theory by assuming the base rock motions consist of out-of-plane SH wave or combined in-plane P and SV waves propagating into the site with an assumed incident angle. The differential axial and lateral displacements between the pipeline segments are stochastically formulated in the frequency domain. The influences of ground motion spatial variations, local soil conditions, wave incident angle and stiffness of the joint are investigated in detail. Numerical results show that ground motion spatial variations and local soil conditions can significantly influence the differential displacements between the pipeline segments.
Keywords
buried segmented pipelines; seismic response; ground motion spatial variation; local site effect; stochastic method;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bi, K. and Hao, H. (2011), "Influence of irregular topography and random soil properties on coherency loss of spatial seismic ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 40(9), 1045-1061.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bi, K. and Hao, H. (2012), "Modelling and simulation of spatially varying earthquake ground motions at sites with varying conditions", Probab. Eng. Mech., 29, 92-104.   DOI
3 Bi, K., Hao, H. and Ren, W. (2010a), "Response of a frame structure on a canyon site to spatially varying ground motions", Struct. Eng. Mech., 36(1), 111-127.   DOI
4 Bi, K., Hao, H. and Chouw, N. (2010b), "Required separation distance between decks and at abutments of a bridge crossing a canyon site to avoid seismic pounding", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 39(3), 303-323.
5 Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1993), Dynamics of Structures, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
6 Der Kiureghian, A. (1980), "Structural response to stationary excitation", J. Eng. Mech., 106(6), 1195-1213.
7 Der Kiureghian, A. (1996), "A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 25(1), 99-111.   DOI
8 Dumanogluid, A.A. and Soyluk, K. (2003), "A stochastic analysis of long span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions including the site-response effect", Eng. Struct., 25(10), 1301-1310.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Hadid, M. and Afra, H. (2000), "Sensitivity analysis of site effects on response spectra of pipelines", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 20(1-4), 249-260.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hao, H. (1993), "Arch responses to correlated multiple excitations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 22(5), 389-404.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Hindy, A. and Novak, M. (1979), "Earthquake response of underground pipelines", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 7(5), 451-476.   DOI
12 Kuraoka, S. and Rainer, J.H. (1996), "Damage to water distribution system caused by the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake", Can. J. Civil Eng., 23(3), 665-677.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Nelson, I. and Weidlinger, P. (1979), "Dynamic seismic analysis of long segmented lifelines", J. Press. Vess. T., 101, 10-20.   DOI
14 O'Roueke, M.J. and Liu, X. (1999), Response of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake Effects, Multidisciplinary Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, Monograph Series, No. 3.
15 Sobczky, K. (1991), Stochastic Wave Propagation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
16 Tang, A. et al. (2010), "Preliminary report on the 27 February 2010 Mw8.8 offshore Maule, Chile earthquake", The Earthquake Engineering Online Archive (NISEE e-library), available online: http://nisee.berkeley.edu/elibrary/Text/201104281.
17 Tsai, J.S., Jou, L.D. and Lin, S.H. (2000), "Damage to buried water supply pipelines in the Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake and a preliminary evaluation of seismic resistance of pipe joints", J. Chin. Inst. Eng., 23(4), 395-408.   DOI
18 Wolf, J.P. (1985), Dynamic Soil-structure Interaction, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
19 Yuan, Y. and Sun, B. (2008), "General information of engineering damage of Wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake", J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 28, 1-114.
20 Zembaty, Z. and Rutenburg, A. (2002), "Spatial response spectra and site amplification effect", Eng. Struct., 24(11), 1485-1496.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Zerva, A., Ang, A. H.S. and Wen, Y.K. (1986), "Development of differential response spectra for lifeline seismic analysis", Probab. Eng. Mech., 1(4), 202-218.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Zerva, A., Ang, A. H.S. and Wen, Y.K. (1988), "Lifeline response to spatially variable ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 16(3), 361-379.   DOI
23 Zerva, A. and Zervas, V. (2002), "Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview", Appl. Mech. Rev., 55(3), 271-297.   DOI   ScienceOn