Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.2.215

An improved pushover analysis procedure for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation of bridges : (1) Introduction to numerical model  

Kwak, Hyo-Gyoung (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
Shin, Dong-Kyu (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.33, no.2, 2009 , pp. 215-238 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper introduces an improved modal pushover analysis (IMPA) which can effectively evaluate the seismic response of multi-span continuous bridge structures on the basis of modal pushover analysis (MPA). Differently from previous modal pushover analyses which cause the numerical unstability because of the occurrence of reversed relation between the pushover load and displacement, the proposed method eliminates this numerical instability and, in advance the coupling effects induced from the direct application of modal decomposition by introducing an identical stiffness ratio for each dynamic mode at the post-yielding stage together with an approximate elastic deformation. In addition to these two introductions, the use of an effective seismic load, calculated from the modal spatial force and applied as the distributed load, makes it possible to predict the dynamic responses of all bridge structures through a simpler analysis procedure than those in conventional modal pushover analyses. Finally, in order to establish validity and applicability of the proposed method, correlation studies between a rigorous nonlinear time history analysis and the proposed method were conducted for multi-span continuous bridges.
Keywords
bridges; improved modal pushover; identical stiffness ratio; equivalent modal load; elastic deformed shape;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 1
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bozorgnia, Y. and Bertero, V.V. (2004), Earthquake Engineering from Engineering Seismology to Performancebased Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton at Florida.
2 Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1999), Capacity-demand-diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures: SDF Systems, Report No. PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.
3 Chopra, A.K. (2001), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
4 Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31, 561-582.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2004), "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 903-927.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12, 51-69.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Freeman, S.A. (1998), Development and Use of Capacity Spectrum Method, Proceedings of 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Seattle, EERI, Oakland, California.
8 Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K. (1998), "Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 452-464.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lakshmana, N., Gopalakrishnan, N., Rama Rao, G.V. and Sathish Kumar, K. (2009), "Dynamic stiffness based computation of response for framed machine foundation", Geomech. Eng., 1(2), 121-142.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994), "Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design", Earthq. Spect., 10, 357-379.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Nassar, A.A. and Krawinkler, H. (1991), Seismic Demands for SDOF and MDOF Systems, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Report No.95, Stanford University, CA.
12 Nickell, R.E. (1976), "Nonlinear dynamics by mode superposition", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 7, 107-129.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Song, J.G. (2004), "Evaluation of inelastic seismic response of multi-degree-of freedom bridge structures using capacity spectrum method", J. Korean Soc. Civil Eng., 4(3A), 541-550.
14 Takeda, T., Sozen, M.A. and Nielsen, N.N. (1970), "Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquake", J. Struct. Div., 96(ST-12), 2557-2573.
15 Usanmi, T., Lu, Z., Ge, H. and Kono, T. (2004), "Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 1: Dynamic analysis approach", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 1337-1354.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Usanmi, T., Lu, Z., Ge, H. and Kono, T. (2004), "Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 2: Simplified verification procedure", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 1355-1372.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Zheng, Y., Usanmi, T. and Ge, H. (2003), "Seismic response prediction of multi-span bridges through pushover analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32, 1259-1274.   DOI   ScienceOn