Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.32.2.283

Validation study on numerical simulation of RC response to close-in blast with a fully coupled model  

Gong, Shunfeng (Institute of Structural Engineering, College of Civil Engineering and Architectural)
Lu, Yong (Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh)
Tu, Zhenguo (Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh)
Jin, Weiliang (Institute of Structural Engineering, College of Civil Engineering and Architectural, Zhejiang Univ.)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.32, no.2, 2009 , pp. 283-300 More about this Journal
Abstract
The characteristic response of a structure to blast load may be divided into two distinctive phases, namely the direct blast response during which the shock wave effect and localized damage take place, and the post-blast phase whereby progressive collapse may occur. A reliable post-blast analysis depends on a sound understanding of the direct blast effect. Because of the complex loading environment and the stress wave effects, the analysis on the direct effect often necessitates a high fidelity numerical model with coupled fluid (air) and solid subdomains. In such a modelling framework, an appropriate representation of the blast load and the high nonlinearity of the material response is a key to a reliable outcome. This paper presents a series of calibration study on these two important modelling considerations in a coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian framework using a hydrocode. The calibration of the simulated blast load is carried out for both free air and internal explosions. The simulation of the extreme dynamic response of concrete components is achieved using an advanced concrete damage model in conjunction with an element erosion scheme. Validation simulations are conducted for two representative scenarios; one involves a concrete slab under internal blast, and the other with a RC column under air blast, with a particular focus on the simulation sensitivity to the mesh size and the erosion criterion.
Keywords
blast load; concrete component; numerical simulation; Eulerian solver; Lagrangian solver; hydrocode; mesh sensitivity;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 5  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 6
연도 인용수 순위
1 AUTODYN (2001), v4.2 manual, Century Dynamics, Inc
2 Baker, W.E. (1973), Explosions in Air, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
3 Brinkman, J.R. (1987), 'Separating shock wave and gas expansion breakage mechanisms', Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Colorado, Keystone, 6-15
4 CEB-FIP (1993), Comite Euro-International du Beton, CEB-FIP Model Code 1990. Redwood Books, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK
5 Gatuingt, F. and Pijaudier-Cabot, G. (2002), 'Coupled damage and plasticity modeling in transient dynamic analysis of concrete', Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 26, 1-24   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Gebbeken, N. and Ruppert, M. (2000), 'A new material model for concrete in high-dynamic hydrocode simulations', Arch. of Appl. Mech., 70, 463-478   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Gebbeken, N. and Ruppert, M. (1999), 'On the safety and reliability of high dynamic hydrocode simulations', Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 46, 839-851   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Gong, S. and Lu, Y. (2007), 'Combined continua and lumped parameter modelling for nonlinear response of structural frames to impulsive ground shock', J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 133(11), 1229-1240   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Henrych, J. (1979), The Dynamics of Explosion and Its Use, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York
10 Holmquist, T.J., Johnson, G.R. and Cook, W.H. (1993), 'A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to large strain, high strain rates and high pressures', 14th International Symposium on Ballistics, Quebec, Canada, 591-600
11 Hommert, P.J., Kuszmaul, J.S. and Parrish, R.L. (1987), 'Computational and experimental studies of the role of stemming in cratering', Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, Colorado, Keystone, 550-562
12 Krauthammer, T., Frye, M., Schoedel, T.R. and Seltzer, M. (2003), 'Advanced SDOF approach for structural concrete systems under blast and impact loads', 11th Int. Sym. on the Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures, Mannheim, Germany
13 Lee, E.L., Hornig, H.C. and Kury, J.W. (1968), 'Adiabatic expansion of high explosive detonation products', UCRL-50422, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, University of California
14 Leppanen, J. (2006), 'Concrete subjected to projectile and fragment impacts: Modelling of crack softening and strain rate dependency in tension', Int. J. Impact Eng., 32, 1828-1841   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lim, H.S. and Weerheijm, J. (2006), 'Breakup of concrete slab under internal explosion', 32nd DoD Explosives Safety Seminar, Philadelphia, PA
16 Malvar, L.J., Crawford, J.E., Wesevich, J.W. and Simons, D. (1997), 'A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D', Int. J. Impact Eng., 19(9-10), 847-873   DOI   ScienceOn
17 LS-DYNA (2003), Keyword User’s Manual, Version 970. Livermore Software Technology Corporation
18 Malvar, L.J., Crawford, J.E. and Morrill, K.B. (2000), 'K&C concrete material model Release III—Automated generation of material model input', K&C Technical Report TR-99-24-B1
19 Malvar, L.J. (1998), 'Review of static and dynamic properties of steel reinforcing bars', ACI Mater. J., 95(5), 609-616   ScienceOn
20 Rabczuk, T. and Eibl, J. (2006), 'Modelling dynamic failure of concrete with meshfree methods', Int. J. Impact Eng., 32, 1878-1897   DOI   ScienceOn
21 TM5-1300 (1990), Structures to Resists the Effects of Accidental Explosions. Department of the Army. USA
22 Tu, Z. and Lu, Y. (2009), 'Evaluation of typical concrete material models used in hydrocodes for high dynamic response simulations', Int. J. Impact Eng., 36, 132-146   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Xu, K. and Lu, Y. (2006), 'Numerical simulation study of spallation in reinforced concrete plates subjected to blast loading', Comput. Struct., 84(5-6), 431-438   DOI   ScienceOn