Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2008.29.3.289

Mesh distortion, locking and the use of metric trial functions for displacement type finite elements  

Kumar, Surendra (CSIR Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation)
Prathap, G. (CSIR Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.29, no.3, 2008 , pp. 289-300 More about this Journal
Abstract
The use of metric trial functions to represent the real stress field in what is called the unsymmetric finite element formulation is an effective way to improve predictions from distorted finite elements. This approach works surprisingly well because the use of parametric functions for the test functions satisfies the continuity conditions while the use of metric (Cartesian) shape functions for the trial functions attempts to ensure that the stress representation during finite element computation can retrieve in a best-fit manner, the actual variation of stress in the metric space. However, the issue of how to handle situations where there is locking along with mesh distortion has never been addressed. In this paper, we show that the use of a consistent definition of the constrained strain field in the metric space can ensure a lock-free solution even when there is mesh distortion. The three-noded Timoshenko beam element is used to illustrate the principles. Some significant conclusions are drawn regarding the optimal strategy for finite element modelling where distortion effects and field-consistency requirements have to be reconciled simultaneously.
Keywords
mesh distortion; locking; unsymmetric parametric-metric formulation; metric trial function; Timoshenko theory; three-node beam element;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 2  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 2
연도 인용수 순위
1 Stricklin, J.A., Ho, W.S., Richardson, E.Q. and Haisler, W.E. (1977), "On isoparametric vs. linear strain triangular elements", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 11, 1041-1043   DOI
2 Prathap, G., Manju, S. and Senthilkumar, V. (2007), The unsymmetric finite element formulation and variational incorrectness. Struct. Eng. Mech., 26(1), 31-42   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Rajendran, S. and Subramanian, S. (2004), "Mesh distortion sensitivity of 8-node plane elasticity elements based on parametric, metric, parametric-metric, and metric-parametric formulations", Struct. Eng. Mech., 17(6), 767-788   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Rajendran, S. (2005), Personal communication
5 Prathap, G. (1993), The Finite Element Method in Structural Mechanics, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht
6 Backlund, J. (1978), "On isoparametric elements", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 12, 731-732   DOI
7 Prathap, G. and Naganarayana, B.P. (1992), "Field-consistency rules for a three-noded shear flexible beam element under non-uniform isoparametric mapping", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 33, 649-664   DOI
8 Arnold, D.N., Boffi, D. and Falk, R.S. (2002), "Approximation of quadrilateral finite elements", Math. Comput., 71, 909-922   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Gifford, L.N. (1979), "More on distorted isoparametric elements", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 14, 290-291   DOI
10 Ooi, E.T., Rajendran, S. and Yeo, J.H. (2004), "A 20-node hexahedron element with enhanced distortion tolerance", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 60, 2501-2530   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Prathap, G., Senthilkumar, V. and Manju, S. (2006), Mesh distortion immunity of finite elements and the best-fit paradigm. Sadhana, 31, 505-514   DOI
12 Rajendran, S. and Liew, K.M. (2003), "A novel unsymmetric 8-node plane element immune to mesh distortion under a quadratic field", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 58, 1718-1748