Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2002.13.6.671

Correlation between torsional vibration and translational vibration  

Jeng, V. (National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)
Tsai, Y.L. (National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Structural Engineering and Mechanics / v.13, no.6, 2002 , pp. 671-694 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper presents theoretical investigation on the cross correlation between torsional vibration ($u_{\theta}$) and translation vibration ($u_x$) of asymmetrical structure under white noise excitation. The formula reveals that the cross correlation coefficient (${\rho}$) is a function of uncoupled frequency ratio (${\Omega}={\omega}_{\theta}/{\omega}_x$), eccentricity, and damping ratio (${\xi}$). Simulations involving acceleration records from fifteen different earthquakes show correlation coefficients results similar to the theoretical correlation coefficients. The uncoupled frequency ratio is the dominating parameter to ${\rho}$; generally, ${\rho}$ is positive for ${\omega}_{\theta}/{\omega}_x$ > 1.0, negative for ${\omega}_{\theta}/{\omega}_x$ < 1.0, and close to zero for ${\omega}_{\theta}/{\omega}_x$ = 1.0. When the eccentricity or damping ratio increases, ${\rho}$ increases moderately for small ${\Omega}$ (< 1.0) only. The relation among $u_x$, $u_{\theta}$ and corner displacement are best presented by ${\rho}$; a simple way to hand-calculate the theoretical dynamic corner displacements from $u_x$, $u_{\theta}$ and ${\rho}$ is proposed as an alternative to dynamic analysis.
Keywords
dynamic; torsion; seismic response; effective eccentricity; cross correlation; static design; design eccentricity; white noise;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 2  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 2
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kan, C.L. and Chopra, A.K. (1979), "Linear and nonlinear earthquake responses of simple torsionally coupled systems", Report No. UCB/EERC-79/03, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
2 Rutenberg, A. and Pekau, O.A. (1987), "Seismic code provisions for asymmetric structures: a re-evaluation", Eng. Struct., 9, 255-264.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Kan, C.L. and Chopra, A.K. (1976), "Coupled lateral torsional response of buildings to ground shaking", Report No. UCB/EERC-76/13, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
4 Pan, T.C. and Kelly, J.M. (1983), "Seismic response of torsionally coupled base isolated structures", Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn., 11, 749-770.   DOI
5 Jeng, V. and Kasai, K. (1996), "Spectral relative motion of two structures due to seismic travel waves", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(10), 1128-1135.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Uniform Building Code. (1997), Int. Conf.of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
7 Rosenblueth, E. and Meli, R. (1986), "The 1985 earthquake: causes and effects in Mexico City", Concrete int, 8(5), 23-34.
8 Der Kiureghian, A. (1981), "A response spectrum method for random vibration analysis of MDOF systems", Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn., 9, 419-435.   DOI
9 Chandler, A.M. and Hutchinson, G.L. (1988), "Evaluation of the secondary torsional design provisions of earthquake building codes", Proc. Inst. Civ. Engrs. Part 2, 85, 587-607.   DOI
10 Tso, W.K. and Dempsey, K.M. (1980), "Seismic torsional provisions for dynamic eccentricity," Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn., 8, 275-285   DOI   ScienceOn