Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5757/JKVS.2010.19.6.453

Risk and Risk Perception of Nanotechnology  

Yi, Sang-Wook (Department of Philosophy, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Vacuum Society / v.19, no.6, 2010 , pp. 453-459 More about this Journal
Abstract
Nanotechnology is now widely believed to be one of the most influential techno-sciences of the future. Or at least it is believed that way in most of industrial countries including South Korea. Naturally, the governments of these industrial countries are currently investing a sizable portion of their human and material resources in order to go ahead in this prominent area of research. Consequently, nanotechnology in these countries has become one of the social sectors where reasonable accountability is normally called for. I claim that reasonable accountability of nanotechnology should take into account the risk-perception of citizens as regards nanotechnology as well as its risk itself. Risk-perception could be variable, changeable, and prone to be polarized; still we should pay more attention to public risk-perception because it is clearly effective in mobilizing public movements, objective in the intersubjective way, and legitimate in a democratic society.
Keywords
Nanotechnology; Accountability; Risk; Risk-perception; Democratic society;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 David M. Berube, Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind Nanotechnology Buzz (Prometheus Books, Amherst, 2006).
2 National Science and Technology Council, Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (National Science Foundation, Arlington, 2001).
3 Royal Society, Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, Royal Society Policy Document 19/04, (Royal Society, London, 2004).
4 Philip Kitcher, Science, Truth and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
5 Dong-A.com, an article of 2009.8.28 paper, checked at Oct. 12, 2010, (http://www.donga.com/fbin/output?n=200908280101).
6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticide Issues in the Works: nanotechnology, the science of small, checked at Oct. 12, 2010, (2008) (http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/about/intheworks/nanotechnology.htm).
7 CNMT, 2004 NanoKorea Survey Summary of Public Awareness of Nanotechnology, checked at Oct. 12, 2010, (2004) (http://cnmt.kist.re.kr/main/pr/newsletter/save/10/sub11-2.html).
8 S. K. Cho and E. H. Cho, Korean J. Bioethics 10, 17 (2009).
9 KISTEP, The Technology Assessment Report on Nanotechnology (Ministry of Science and Technology, Seoul, 2005).
10 Aldous Huxley, Brave New World (HarperCollins, New York, 2006, originally 1932).
11 Sheldon Krimsky and Dominic Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk (Praeger Publishers, Westport, 1992).
12 Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson, Democracy and Disagreement (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
13 Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson, Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004).
14 Eric Drexler, Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992).
15 Greg Egan, Quarantine (EOS, London, 1992).
16 ETC Group, The Big Down: From Genomes to Atoms (ETC group, Ottawa, 2003).
17 Economic and Social Research Council, The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology (ESRC, Swindon, 2003).