Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13104/imri.2019.23.3.202

Ultrashort Echo Time MRI (UTE-MRI) Quantifications of Cortical Bone Varied Significantly at Body Temperature Compared with Room Temperature  

Jerban, Saeed (Department of Radiology, University of California)
Szeverenyi, Nikolaus (Department of Radiology, University of California)
Ma, Yajun (Department of Radiology, University of California)
Guo, Tan (Department of Radiology, University of California)
Namiranian, Behnam (Department of Radiology, University of California)
To, Sarah (Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System)
Jang, Hyungseok (Department of Radiology, University of California)
Chang, Eric Y. (Department of Radiology, University of California)
Du, Jiang (Department of Radiology, University of California)
Publication Information
Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging / v.23, no.3, 2019 , pp. 202-209 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the temperature-based differences of cortical bone ultrashort echo time MRI (UTE-MRI) biomarkers between body and room temperatures. Investigations of ex vivo UTE-MRI techniques were performed mostly at room temperature however, it is noted that the MRI properties of cortical bone may differ in vivo due to the higher temperature which exists as a condition in the live body. Materials and Methods: Cortical bone specimens from fourteen donors ($63{\pm}21$ years old, 6 females and 8 males) were scanned on a 3T clinical scanner at body and room temperatures to perform T1, $T2^*$, inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) $T2^*$ measurements, and two-pool magnetization transfer (MT) modeling. Results: Single-component $T2^*$, $IR-T2^*$, short and long component $T2^*s$ from bi-component analysis, and T1 showed significantly higher values while the noted macromolecular fraction (MMF) from MT modeling showed significantly lower values at body temperature, as compared with room temperature. However, it is noted that the short component fraction (Frac1) showed higher values at body temperature. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for careful consideration of the temperature effects on MRI measurements, before extending a conclusion from ex vivo studies on cortical bone specimens to clinical in vivo studies. It is noted that the increased relaxation times at higher temperature was most likely due to an increased molecular motion. The T1 increase for the studied human bone specimens was noted as being significantly higher than the previously reported values for bovine cortical bone. The prevailing discipline notes that the increased relaxation times of the bound water likely resulted in a lower signal loss during data acquisition, which led to the incidence of a higher Frac1 at body temperature.
Keywords
Cortical bone; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrashort echo time; Body temperature;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ma YJ, Lu X, Carl M, et al. Accurate T1 mapping of short T2 tissues using a three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones actual flip angle imaging-variable repetition time (3D UTE-Cones AFI-VTR) method. Magn Reson Med 2018;80:598-608   DOI
2 Du J, Diaz E, Carl M, Bae W, Chung CB, Bydder GM. Ultrashort echo time imaging with bicomponent analysis. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:645-649   DOI
3 Chang EY, Bae WC, Shao H, et al. Ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone. NMR Biomed 2015;28:873-880   DOI
4 Ma YJ, Tadros A, Du J, Chang EY. Quantitative twodimensional ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (2D UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:1941-1949   DOI
5 Ma YJ, Shao H, Du J, Chang EY. Ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) imaging and modeling: magic angle independent biomarkers of tissue properties. NMR Biomed 2016;29:1546-1552   DOI
6 Jerban S, Ma Y, Nazaran A, et al. Detecting stress injury (fatigue fracture) in fibular cortical bone using quantitative ultrashort echo time-magnetization transfer (UTE-MT): an ex vivo study. NMR Biomed 2018;31:e3994   DOI
7 Ozhinsky E, Han M, Bucknor M, Krug R, Rieke V. T2-based temperature monitoring in bone marrow for MR-guided focused ultrasound. J Ther Ultrasound 2016;4:26   DOI
8 Han M, Scott SJ, Ozhinsky E, et al. Assessing temperature changes in cortical bone using variable flip-angle ultrashort echo-time MRI. AIP Conference Proceedings 2017;1821, 060001
9 Ramsay E, Mougenot C, Kazem M, Laetsch TW, Chopra R. Temperature-dependent MR signals in cortical bone: potential for monitoring temperature changes during highintensity focused ultrasound treatment in bone. Magn Reson Med 2015;74:1095-1102   DOI
10 Rieke V, Butts Pauly K. MR thermometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:376-390   DOI
11 Carl M, Bydder GM, Du J. UTE imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a time-efficient multispoke inversion recovery pulse sequence. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:577-582   DOI
12 Han M, Rieke V, Scott SJ, et al. Quantifying temperaturedependent T1 changes in cortical bone using ultrashort echo-time MRI. Magn Reson Med 2015;74:1548-1555   DOI
13 Ma YJ, Chang EY, Carl M, Du J. Quantitative magnetization transfer ultrashort echo time imaging using a timeefficient 3D multispoke Cones sequence. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:692-700   DOI
14 Gurney PT, Hargreaves BA, Nishimura DG. Design and analysis of a practical 3D cones trajectory. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:575-582   DOI
15 Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:870-883   DOI
16 Ma YJ, Zhu Y, Lu X, Carl M, Chang EY, Du J. Short T2 imaging using a 3D double adiabatic inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time cones (3D DIR-UTE-Cones) sequence. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:2555-2563   DOI
17 Biswas R, Bae W, Diaz E, et al. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging with bi-component analysis: bound and free water evaluation of bovine cortical bone subject to sequential drying. Bone 2012;50:749-755   DOI
18 Seifert AC, Wehrli FW. Solid-state quantitative (1)H and (31)P MRI of cortical bone in humans. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2016;14:77-86   DOI
19 Granke M, Does MD, Nyman JS. The role of water compartments in the material properties of cortical bone. Calcif Tissue Int 2015;97:292-307   DOI
20 Nyman JS, Ni Q, Nicolella DP, Wang X. Measurements of mobile and bound water by nuclear magnetic resonance correlate with mechanical properties of bone. Bone 2008;42:193-199   DOI
21 Du J, Bydder GM. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort-TE MRI of cortical bone. NMR Biomed 2013;26:489-506   DOI
22 Lee H, Zhao X, Song HK, Zhang R, Bartlett SP, Wehrli FW. Rapid dual-RF, dual-echo, 3D ultrashort echo time craniofacial imaging: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 2019;81:3007-3016   DOI
23 Lu X, Jerban S, Wan L, et al. Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging with tricomponent analysis for human cortical bone. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:348-355   DOI
24 Wan L, Zhao W, Ma Y, et al. Fast quantitative 3D ultrashort echo time MRI of cortical bone using extended cones sampling. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:225-236   DOI
25 Jerban S, Ma Y, Wan L, et al. Collagen proton fraction from ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTEMT) MRI modelling correlates significantly with cortical bone porosity measured with micro-computed tomography (muCT). NMR Biomed 2019;32:e4045
26 Wu Y, Dong Y, Jiang J, Li H, Zhu T, Chen S. Evaluation of the bone-ligament and tendon insertions based on Raman spectrum and its PCA and CLS analysis. Sci Rep 2017;7:38706   DOI
27 Rajapakse CS, Bashoor-Zadeh M, Li C, Sun W, Wright AC, Wehrli FW. Volumetric cortical bone porosity assessment with MR imaging: validation and clinical feasibility. Radiology 2015;276:526-535   DOI
28 Manhard MK, Nyman JS, Does MD. Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation. Transl Res 2017;181:1-14   DOI
29 Diaz E, Chung CB, Bae WC, et al. Ultrashort echo time spectroscopic imaging (UTESI): an efficient method for quantifying bound and free water. NMR Biomed 2012;25:161-168   DOI
30 Bae WC, Chen PC, Chung CB, Masuda K, D'Lima D, Du J. Quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI of human cortical bone: correlation with porosity and biomechanical properties. J Bone Miner Res 2012;27:848-857   DOI
31 Granke M, Makowski AJ, Uppuganti S, Does MD, Nyman JS. Identifying novel clinical surrogates to assess human bone fracture toughness. J Bone Miner Res 2015;30:1290-1300   DOI
32 Li C, Seifert AC, Rad HS, et al. Cortical bone water concentration: dependence of MR imaging measures on age and pore volume fraction. Radiology 2014;272:796-806   DOI
33 Johnson EM, Vyas U, Ghanouni P, Pauly KB, Pauly JM. Improved cortical bone specificity in UTE MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:684-695   DOI
34 Chen J, Chang EY, Carl M, et al. Measurement of bound and pore water T1 relaxation times in cortical bone using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones sequences. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:2136-2145   DOI