Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2022.25.6.58

Development of Basic Design Education Materials Incorporating Critico(-Creative) Thinking: Egg Drop Device Design  

Park, Sang Tae (University College, Sungkyunkwan University)
Ku, Jin Hee (Division of Software Liberal Arts, Mokwon University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.25, no.6, 2022 , pp. 58-68 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper aims to prepare basic design education materials explaining the design process of egg drop device by incorporating critico(-creative) thinking. To this end, in this paper, by utilizing the creative problem solving process and the elements and standards of critical thinking, 'the five-step creative engineering design education guidelines' have been prepared so that engineering freshmen can effectively participate in engineering design projects without major knowledge. We would like to apply them to the egg drop device design. The egg drop device design, which is experiment to make and drop a drop device that can protect an egg from breaking when it is dropped freely from high places, is an engineering design project that is widely used not only in elementary, middle and high school science events but also in engineering education courses under the name of 'stunt egg'. Perhaps the basic design education material on the egg drop device design incorporating critico(-creative) thinking in this paper will contribute to incorporating critico(-creative) thinking into engineering education, as well as to achieving the educational goals of the basic design subject.
Keywords
Basic design education materials; Critico(-creative) thinking-the creative problem solving process and the elements and standards of critical thinking-; the five-step creative engineering design education guidelines; Egg drop device design;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 구진희(2018). <창의 설계> 강의자료 PPT.
2 김대수(2016). 창의공학설계. 생능출판사.
3 김영정(2004). 비판적 사고와 공학교육(4회). 공학교육, 11(4), 73-89
4 김영정(2005). 비판적 사고의 9요소와 9기준. 대한토목학회지, 53(11), 217-215
5 김영정.서원주(2004). 비판적 사고, 논리적 사고, 창의적 사고. 철학사상, 별책 제4권, 33-76.
6 정호원 외(2018). <창의 설계> 계란낙하실험보고서.
7 김은경(2016). 창의적 공학설계. 한빛아카데미.
8 박강 외(2010). 공학 문제 해결의 길라잡이 창의 공학 2판. 인피니티 북스.
9 박상태(2020). 공학교육에서의 비판적 사고의 활용 방안. 공학교육 연구, 23(6), 27-32.
10 박상태.김제도.윤성호(2020). 비판적 사고를 활용한 공학 설계 교육. 공학교육연구, 23(6), 51-59.   DOI
11 양혜주(2013). 3년제 간호학생의 비판적 사고성향과 문제해결능력과의 관계. 한국산학기술학회논문지, 14(12), 6387-6394.   DOI
12 이영태.정재원(2021). 공학설계의 교수.학습적 개념 고찰. 공학교육 연구, 24(3), 3-10.
13 주은숙(2018). 창의융합설계교육을 위한 교안 개발-문제정의와 정보수집을 중심으로-. 2018 공학교육학술대회 자료집, 17-18.
14 Andrea, B. et al.(2022). The development of students critical thinking abilities and dispositions through the concept mapping learning method- A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, 1-17.
15 Avsec. S. & Savec V. F.(2019). Creativity and critical thinking in engineering design: the role of interdisciplinary augmentation. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 30-36.
16 Clayton, L. H.(2006). Concept mapping: an effective, active teaching-learning method. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(4), 197-203.
17 Lumsdaine, E., Lumsdaine M. & Shelnutt J. W.(2002). 창의적 문제해결과 공학설계. 명지대학교 창의공학 연구회 역, 파워북.
18 National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, National Research Council(1996). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
19 Spuzic, S. et al.(2016). The synergy of creativity and critical thinking in engineering design: The role of interdisciplinary augmentation and the fine arts. Technology in Society, 45, 1-7.   DOI