Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2019.22.5.56

A Qualitative Study on Personality of Intelligent Artificial Object for Engineering Education - Focusing on Appearance, Sound, Behavior of Robot Cleaners  

Lee, Jungjin (Department of Smart Design Engineering, The International Design school for Advanced Studies (IDAS), Hongik University)
Ahn, JungHyun (Department of Mechanical and System Design Engineering, Hongik University)
Lim, Dokshin (Department of Mechanical and System Design Engineering, Hongik University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.22, no.5, 2019 , pp. 56-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper suggests the necessity of design education to engineering majors through qualitative research on the characteristics of intelligent artifacts. Robot cleaner is one of intelligent artificial objects that can approach people's life without awkwardness. How do people think of robot cleaners and define their personality, these days? In this experiment, subjects use and observe four different robot cleaners that have different appearances, behaviors and sounds in an experimental setup where is similar to actual use environment. We measure subjects' preferences and assessments for four different robot cleaners' personality. The test subjects were 11 designers who frequently collaborated with engineers and were able to express and express opinions about products. Experimental results showed that robot cleaners with the highest scores in appearance, behavior, and sound had the highest preference. In contrast, robot cleaners with low scores in three factors showed different results in the preference ranking.
Keywords
Engineering education; Robotic cleaner; Personality; design elements; preference;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김지훈.김관주.손주영(2005). 엔지니어를 위한 디자인 교육방법에 관한 연구. 한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집, 252-253.
2 한병기.지해성(2006). 공학교육에서의 디자인 및 창의적 설계교육. 공학교육학회. 공학교육연구, 9(4호), 19-27.
3 이우훈 외(2005). 홈서비스로봇의 맵빌딩을 위한 효율적인 휴먼-로봇 상호작용방식에 대한 연구. Archives of Design Research, 18(2), 155-164.
4 마동혁.조형준.남택진(2019). 개인 맞춤을 위한 가정용 로봇의 DIY 기법. 한국HCI학회 학술대회, 6-9.
5 정정필.허성철(2008). 로봇디자인에 대한 선호 반응에 영향을 미치는 조형요소의 특성. 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집, 139-142.
6 김수아.오동우(2018). 가정용 소셜 로봇의 감정 표현을 위한 동작언어(Kinesics)에 관한 연구. 한국과학예술융합학회, Vol. 35, 69-82.
7 김준형.김상현.박재흥(2017). HRI 연구 동향. 로봇과 인간, 14(4), 17-24.
8 이종훈.남택진(2007). 제품의 감성적 가치증진을 위한 물리적 움직임 디자인. Archives of Design Research, 20(4), 41-52.
9 김현정(2009). 로봇의 디자인 아이덴티티 개발. 한국로봇학회. 로봇학회논문지, 4(2), 81-87.
10 정연승 외(2008). 개별제품 만족이 기업브랜드 제품 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 대한경영학회지, 21(5), 2143-2169.
11 김창환(2017). 소셜로봇의 행동 표현 기술. 로봇과 인간, 14(4), 25-36.
12 김병수(2008). 청소로봇의 성능 및 소비자의 반응. 로봇과 인간, 5(1), 38-43.
13 김서영.나건(2019). 다학제 협업을 위한 디자이너와 엔지니어의 특성 연구, 한국디자인리서치, 4(2), 20-28.
14 김기수(2007), 제품디자이너의 인지적 사고과정 분석, 홍익대학교
15 Rijsdijk, S. A., & Hultink, E. J.(2009). How Today's Consumers Perceive Tomorrow's Smart Products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 24-42.   DOI
16 Darling, K., Nandy, P., & Breazeal, C.(2015). Empathic concern and the effect of stories in human-robot interaction. 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN), 770-775.
17 Sung, J.-Y. et al.(2007). "My Roomba Is Rambo": Intimate Home Appliances. In J. Krumm, G. D. Abowd, A. Seneviratne, & T. Strang (Eds.), UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 4717, 145-162.
18 Hendriks, B. et al.(2011). Robot Vacuum Cleaner Personality and Behavior. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(2), 187-195.   DOI