Browse > Article

A Case Study of a Living Lab based Engineering Design Class : When and How do Students Learn?  

Han, Kyonghee (Engineering Education Innovation Center, Yonsei University)
Choi, Moonhee (Asian Center, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.21, no.4, 2018 , pp. 10-19 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study introduces an engineering design class which is experimental in a sense that it is planned and implemented with three key concepts such as learner-centered education, living lab and community based learning. With the class run in being connected with one regional community in Seoul, it focuses on its educational effects acquired through the living lab-based approach. And this research investigates the student's experiences of when, what and how they learn in a learner-centered class. It shows that, rather than taking professor's one dimensional lectures in classroom, the students learn actively when they face with the problem in the field. Students have come to carry out engineering design from the perspective of stakeholders, not from the supplier or producer's perspective in the process of meeting with the problem in reality. Team based collaborative activities are crucial in the entire design process. More importantly, students' design products have been transformed into more useful and meaningful ones as stakeholders of the local community have participated into the students' works. However, we need to recognize that there are some important issues that need to be solved institutionally and systematically in order for such educations to spread. This study suggests several educational arrangements for those issues.
Keywords
Learner-centered Education; Living Lab; Community-based Learning; Learning experience; Engineering Design Class;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김성종.김현진(2016). 국내 학교교육에서의 테크놀로지 기반 학습자 중심 학습환경 연구의 동향 분석. 교육공학연구, 32(3), 611-641.
2 김진국.남상진(2007). 좋은 지리수업에 대한 현장 지리교사들의 개념: 포커스 그룹 논의를 중심으로. 한국지리환경교육학회지, 15(2), 153-166.
3 박경선.나일주(2011). 교수-학습 환경에서의 맥락설계원리 및 모형개발 연구. 교육정보미디어연구, 17(1), 1-37.
4 성지은.송위진.김종선.박인용(2015). ICT 분야의 한국형 리빙랩 구축 방안 연구. 미래창조과학부.
5 성지은.송위진.정병걸.최창법.윤찬영.정서화.한규영(2017). 국내 리빙랩 현황 분석과 발전 방안 연구. 과학기술정책연구원.
6 신선경(2013). 공학도를 위한 학습자 중심 글쓰기 교육의 방법과 내용. 작문연구, 19, 301-330.
7 오은주(2009). 학습자 중심 수업을 위한 교수역량 탐구. 사고개발, 5(2), 107-134.
8 이우성(2014). 적정기술 사업화 사례와 문제점: 캄보디아 사업. 과학기술정책, 24(1), 46-57.
9 전치형(2014). 소외된 90%, 따뜻한 기술, 최고의 솔루션. 과학기술연구, 14(2), 127-164.
10 정명곤(2018). 플랫폼 씨앗 틔운 소방.시니어 리빙랩(하). 산학뉴스, 2018. 7. 10.
11 정병걸(2017). 사회혁신의 장으로서 리빙랩과 패러독스. 과학기술학연구, 17(1), 41-69.
12 Armstrong, J. S.(2012). "Natural Learning in Higher Education", Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Heidelberg: Springer.
13 Lucena, Juan and Schneider, Jen and Leydens, Jon. A.(2010). Engineering and Sustainable Community Development. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
14 Westerlund, M. and Leminen, S.(2011). "Managing the Challenges of Becoming and Open Innovation Company: Experiences from Living Labs", Technology Innovation Management Review, October: 19-25.