Browse > Article

The Effect on Images of an Engineering Program Participate toward 'Engineering' and 'Technology' through Semantic Differential Method  

Lim, Nha Young (Education Center for Creative Future Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Lee, Chang Hoon (Department of Mechanical Metallurgical Engineering Education, Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.20, no.6, 2017 , pp. 68-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study has a purpose to analyse changes in perception and image about engineering and technology of students who participated in the engineering camp. To achieve this objective, the questions were as follows. 1) What about participants' image difference for engineering before and after participating the engineering camp 2) What about participants' image difference for technology before and after participating the engineering camp. For this study, the program was progressed from Aug in 2017 and the data was collected from 88 students, middle school seniors and high school freshmen. The results of this study were as follows: First, secondary students perceived 'valuable(6.74)', 'meaningful(6.73)', 'rich(6.40)', 'collaborative(6.42)', 'nice(6.22)' as high image rank of the positive response for engineering. On the other hand, 'complex(3.59)', 'labored(3.80)', 'hard(4.66)', 'dangerous(4.48)', 'cold(4.86)' were perceived as low image rank of the negative response for engineering. We can realize that they generally has the image that engineering is valuable, meaningful and nice but also labored, complex and hard. The students who participated in the engineering camp showed the greatest difference in 'complex - simple' and 'dangerous - safe' engineering categories before and after the camp, followed by 'cold - hot', 'labored - easy', and 'hard - soft', respectively. Second, secondary students perceived 'meaningful(6.58)', 'valuable(6.55)', 'wide(6.38)', 'nice(6.37)', 'strong(6.25)' as high image rank of the positive response for technology. On the other hand, 'complex(3.85)', 'labored(3.93)', 'hard(4.62)', 'dangerous(4.72)', 'cold(5.05)' were perceived as low image rank of the negative response for technology. The students who participated in the engineering camp had the big change in 'hard - soft' technology category before and after the camp, followed by 'complex - simple', 'labored - easy', 'theoretical - practical' and 'dangerous - safe', respectively. We can see that the negative images for technology which were complex, labored, dangerous, theoretical was improved with positive image such as simple, easy, safe and practical, after conducting the engineering camp. In conclusion, both image recognitions for engineering and technology have improved after the camp. It means that interesting and entertaining engineering-technology program can boost interests in engineering and technology which felt difficult, so that images about them can be turned out positive. Also, it is possible to reduce avoidance of natural science and engineering subjects, as part of the purpose of training creative talents in science and engineering, so it can be said that the engineering camp is highly meaningful because it can lead students into the field of science and engineering.
Keywords
Semantic differential method; Out-of-school education; Engineering; Technology;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 교육부(2017). OECD, 학업성취도 국제 비교 연구(PISA 2015) 결과 발표. 교육부 보도자료.
2 김기수, 이창훈(2010). 의미분별법에 의한 공업계 고등학생의 “공학”에 대한 이미지 연구. 대한공업교육학회, 35(2), 25-42
3 김영민, 허혜연, 이창훈, 김기수(2013a). 초.중등교육에서의 공학교육에 대한 공학전문가들의 인식 연구. 대한공업교육학회지, 38(2), 136-155
4 김영민, 강정하, 허남영(2015). 과학 영재 학생들의 공학에 대한 이미지와 인식 분석. 영재교육연구, 25(1), 95-117   DOI
5 김영훈(2013). 중학생이 인식하는 마이스터 고등학교의 이미지 분석. 충남대학교 석사학위논문
6 김용익(2002). 중학교 학생들에게 형성되어 있는 실과 교과의 이미지 분석. 한국농업교육학회지, 34(4), 97-166
7 김이슬, 이선희, 손정주, 김중복, 권효순(2010). 교육프로그램 참가자 만족도 조사로 본 국립과천과학관의 비형식 과학교육 프로그램 운영 방향 연구. 과학교육연구지, 34(2), 279-290
8 김종승, 김영민, 김현경, 이창훈, 김기수(2012). 의미분별법에 의한 초등학교 교사의 '공학, 기술, 실과'에 대한 연구. 실과교육연구, 18(4), 23-43
9 류영현(2005). 한국의 국가이미지 제고활동 현황과 인식에 관한 연구. 충남대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
10 박도순(2001). 교육연구방법론, 교육문화사.
11 염성원, 오경수(2003). 의미분별법에 의한 중.고등학생의 기술 교과에 대한 이미지. 홍보학연구, 7(2), 98-143
12 이윤희(2003). 이미지 문명에 대한 사회학적 고찰. 서강대학교 석사학위논문
13 임나영, 김영숙, 이창훈, 김기수(2016). 공학캠프가 청소년의 이공계진로 선택에 미치는 영향 분석. 공학교육학술대회, 20
14 최유현, 이정수, 이정균 (2009). 의미분별법에 의한 초등학교 교사의 발명에 대한 이미지. 실과교육연구, 15(4), 161-182
15 J. -J Wunenburger (1997). Philosophie des images. Presses universitaires de France.
16 National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council[NAE & NRC] (2010). Standards for k-12 Engineering Education?. Washington. DC : The National Academies Press.
17 Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. & tannebaum, P. H.(1957). The Mesurement of Meaning. Urban: Univ. of Illinois Press.
18 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). PISA 2015 Results in focus. Paris. OECD.