Browse > Article

Development on the model of outcome-based course evaluation design for Course-Embedded Assessment  

Kim, Hyekyung (Sunmoon University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.18, no.6, 2015 , pp. 24-31 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop the model of course evaluation design for CEA(Course-Embedded Assessment), which is focused on course level for assessment reliability. This study was conducted by the process of model development and validation according to Richey & Klein(2007)'s model development methodology. The model of this study was comprised with the three steps of learning objectives based on course outcome, assessment design and goal achievement analysis of course, which were explained by specific design principles. Also, this model was validated by two steps, which one was on the inner validation and the other was the outer validation(Richey & Klein, 2007). Considerations for designing the model of course evaluation have been suggested and a few implications were discussed.
Keywords
program outcome; course-embedded assessment; course evaluation design model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 송동주. (2014). 교과기반평가(course-embedded assessment)의 의미와 방향. 공학교육인증포럼 자료집. 한국공학교육인증원
2 신행자, 김시범, 강원호. (2008). 프로그램학습성과 타당성 관찰을 위한 교과목-임베디드 평가도구 분석. 한국기계가공학회지, 7(4). pp. 82-95.
3 이희원, 김성환, 박 근, 김정엽. (2010). 캡스톤디자인 교과목 기반의 프로그램학습성과 평가 연구. 공학교육연구, 13(6), pp. 143-151
4 한국공학교육인증원. (2008). 공학인증기준(KEC2005) 설명서.
5 한국공학교육인증원. (2014). KEC2015 인증기준. http://abeek.or.kr/
6 한지영. (2009). 공학교육의 프로그램학습성과 평가를 위한 코스 임베디드 평가의 적용 가능성 고찰. 공학교육연구, 12(3). pp. 96-106.
7 Dick, W., & Carey, L. M. (1978). The systemic design of instruction. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
8 Gerretson, H & Golson, E. (2005). Synopsis of the use of course-embedded assessment in a medium sized public university's general education program. The Journal of general education, 54(2), pp. 139-146.   DOI
9 Kelly, L. (2002). Course-embedded assessment process. [http://cai.cc.ca.us/workshops/Course%20EmAssessment%20Process.doc]
10 Office of Academic Planning & Assessment. (2001). Program-Based Review and Assessment: Tools and Techniques for Program Improvement. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
11 Richey, R. C. & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12 김정식. (2007). 교과목 프로그램학습성과 평가의 전략적 접근, 공학교육연구, 10(2). 73-86.
13 김정식. (2008). 공과대학 교과목 및 프로그램 평가를 위한 Course embedded assessment의 분석과 개선. 교양교육연구, 2(1). pp. 79-99.
14 김진영, 강성주, 강보선, 김대익. (2011). 의사소통능력에 대한 학습성과 평가개발에 관한 연구. 공학교육연구, 14(6), pp. 41-47.
15 나일주, 정현미. (2001). 웹기반 가상교육 프로그램 설계를 위한 활동모형 개발. 교육공학연구, 17(2), pp. 27-52.
16 성태제. (2009). 교육평가의 기초(2판). 서울: 학지사