Browse > Article

SEG Based Engineering Education Innovation: A Case Study on GNTECH-ICEE  

Bae, Kangyul (Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology (GNTECH))
Jun, Geeill (Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology (GNTECH))
Kim, Namkyung (Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology (GNTECH))
Chung, Jaewoo (Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology (GNTECH))
Cho, Yunjin (Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology (GNTECH))
Huh, Keunyoung (Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology (GNTECH))
Ki, Junghoon (Myongji University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.15, no.5, 2012 , pp. 69-77 More about this Journal
Abstract
GNTECH-ICEE, which this study seeks to investigate and evaluate, demonstrates a new system of training innovative engineers. An essential component of this operation is a Small Engineering Group (SEG) that links professors, students and industrial experts together, to study and apply different techniques in determining the processes and products that relate industrial sectors needs. As an education program, SEG also provides a right direction for educating students, and generates industry-university link based human resources. Through these efforts, GNTECH-ICEE has effectively trained creative, professional, and practical engineers, by operating a variety of programs for meeting industrial needs and enhancing engineering education. SEG has many merits that have influenced its success so far, but the program also faces some challenges. The merits include; strong group bondage, practical ability incubation, and efficient administrative support. In terms of demerits, it is evident that sufficient theoretical education and local small-middle size enterprises (SMEs)' sustainable participation cannot be warranted. Thus, we propose that initiative strategies have been helpful to maximize GNTECH-ICEE's goal of making students into multi-player engineer, but continuously financial and administrative strategies be put into place in order to guarantee SMEs' long-term devotion to the program, and to help create a sustainable network between students and the companies involved.
Keywords
Innovation Center for Engineering Education; Small Engineering Group; multi-player engineer; local SMEs;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jeong, S. Y. & Kim, K. D.(2008). A new direction in academic-industrial cooperation: academic-industrial cooperation around the lab building. Technology Innovation, Research 16(2):17-40.
2 Jun, G. I. et al.(2009). SEG-based multiplayer SME industrial specialist development. Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology.
3 Ki, J. H., Joo, J. H., & Im, H. B.(2009). Engineering accreditation system performance and operation analysis. Research Report of Human Resources Development Services of Korea.
4 Kim, N. K. et al.(2008). SEG-based multiplayer SME industrial specialist development. Gyeongnam National University of Science & Technology.
5 Kim, S. W.(2007). Innovative Ways of Engineering Education by Category. Engineering Education 14(1): 14-15.
6 Kim, T. W.(2008). Preparing special edition for Engineering Education Innovation. Engineering Education 15(1): 29.
7 Lassig, C. J.(2009). Promoting Creativity in education - from policy to practice: an Australian perspective. Creative and Cognition: 229-238.
8 Min, D. K., Eo, S. B., & Gang, S. C.(2007). National technical qualification system and the engineering education accreditation system linked research plan. The Labor Department of Korea.
9 Park, S. M.(2007). Positive change and innovation, the creative talent-demander-oriented engineering education in promoting innovation. Engineering Education 14(1): 10-13.
10 Rutherford, T. & Holmes, J.(2008). Engineering networks: university-industry networks in Southern Ontario automotive industry clusters. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy, and Society 1(2): 247-264.   DOI
11 Turk-Bicakci, L. & Brint, S.(2005). University-Industry Collaboration: Pattern of Growth for Low- and Middle- Level Performers. Higher Education 49(1-2): 61-89.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Bae, Y. C.(2008). A global era of innovative engineering education and engineering education. Engineering Education 15(1): 30-31.
13 Bell, S.(1996). University-Industry Interaction in the Ontario Centres of Excellence. The Journal of Higher Education 67(3): 322-348.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Choi, J. W.(2008). Engineering education in the direction of innovation under global economic change. Engineering Education 15(1): 38-40.
15 Ertas, A., Tanik, M. M., & Maxwell, T. T.(2000). Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Research Model. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 4(4): 1-11.
16 Im, G. B.(2009). Engineering education accreditation system for community college personnel working for the universityindustry collaborative project-based training model. The Korean Journal of Information Protection 19(1): 67-74.