Browse > Article

Creative Problem Solving Styles, Conflict Management Types and Team Performance in the Cooperative Learning of Engineering College Students  

Ahn, Jeong-Ho (Soongsil University)
Lim, Jee-Young (Hoseo University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.14, no.1, 2011 , pp. 40-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to compare the creative problem solving styles and conflict management types between engineering college students with high and low team performance records. Most students with high team performance records preferredDeveloper style(76.7%) and Task-oriented style(65.1%), whereas most students with low team performance records preferred Explorer style(72.2%) and Person-oriented style(86.1%). Results of the comparison of conflict management types revealed that most students with high team performance records belonged to a competitive logic type(22.8%) and an accommodative compromise type(17.7%), while most students with low team performance records belonged to an accommodative compromise type(20.3%) and a permissive resignation type(12.7%). It would be useful to provide the engineering students with the specialized program to complement their problem solving styles and conflict management types.
Keywords
Creative problem solving style; Conflict management type; Engineering college student; Team performance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Selby, E. C., Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J.(2004). Defining and Assessing Problem-Solving Style: Design and Development of a New Tool. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(4), 221-243.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Treffinger, D. J. & Firestein, R. L.(1989). Update: Guidelines for effective facilitation of creative problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4): 35-49.
3 Wilmot, W. W., & Hocker, J. L.(2001). Interpersonal conflict (6th Ed.). NY:McGraw-Hill.
4 홍종배(2006). 글로벌 시대의 갈등관리: 한국인과 미국인의 문화 내 및 문화 간 갈등관리 전략의 비교. 스피치와 커뮤니케이션, 6, 168-201.
5 Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking (3rd ed.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
6 송해덕(2007). 창의적 문제해결력의 구성요인과 교 수설계원리의 탐색. 열린교육연구, 15(3), 55-73.
7 Selby, E. C., Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (2002). VIEW: An assessment of problem solving style. Sarasota, FL. Center for Creative Learning, Inc.
8 폴리뉴스(2010). 청년실업, 경제에 어떤 영향 미치나, http:// polinews.co.kr/viewnews.html?PageKey＝0401&num＝118 022.
9 헤럴드경제(2010). 같으면서도 다른 '4대 기업의 인 재상' 알면 채용이 보인다. http://biz.heraldm.com/common/Detail.jsp? newsMLId＝20101022000079.
10 디지털 타임스(2010). 글로벌 엔지니어육성 '공학교육인증제'. http://www.dt.co.kr/contents.html?article_no＝2010072902 011357650006.
11 김영채(2005). 창의력의 '사람-과정' 상호작용과 VIEW 검사. 대한사고개발학회 2005 연차학 술대회 발표논문집, 227-234.
12 안주아.이시훈.김광엽(2007). 한국형 갈등관리 유형의 탐색과 매체이용 차이에 관한 연구. 스피치와 커뮤니케이션, 7, 151-178.