1 |
Cheng, K. (2021). Teachers' perceptions of exploiting immersive virtual field trips for learning in primary education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-18.
|
2 |
Choi, Y. (2021). Development and application of virtual field trips programs in K-12. International Conference on Education Research(ICER), 21, 43.
|
3 |
Cotton, D. (2009). Field biology experiences of undergraduate students: The impact of novelty space. Journal of Biological Education, 43(4), 169-174.
DOI
|
4 |
Elkins, J., & Elkins, N. (2007). Teaching geology in the field: Significant geoscience concept gains in entirely field-based introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(2), 126-132.
DOI
|
5 |
Garner, K. (2008). Why do students take photographs on geology field trips: Connections between motivations and novelty space. Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.
|
6 |
Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763-779.
DOI
|
7 |
Hardy, A., Gretzel, U., & Hanson, D. (2013). Travelling neo-tribes: Conceptualising recreational vehicle users. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 11(1-2), 48-60.
DOI
|
8 |
Tutwiler, M., Lin, M., & Chang, C. (2013). Determining virtual environment ''Fit'': The relationship between navigation style in a virtual field trip, student self-reported desire to visit the field tip site in the real world, and the purposes of science education. Journal of Science and Educational Technology, 36(4), 399-417.
|
9 |
Wu, M., & Pearce, P. (2014). Chinese recreational vehicle users in Australia: A netnographic study of tourist motivation. Tourism Management, 43, 22-35.
DOI
|
10 |
Xie, P., & Cheng, K. (2021). Exploring the concept of novelty space to recreational vehicle travels. Journal of China Tourism Research, 17(2), 273-290.
DOI
|
11 |
Xie, P., & Garner, K. (2009). An analysis of students' photos of the novelty space on a field trip. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 9(3), 176-192.
DOI
|
12 |
Lin, M., Tutwiler, M., & Chang, C. (2011). Exploring the relationship between virtual learning environment preference, use, and the learning outcomes in 10th grade earth science students. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(4), 399-417.
DOI
|
13 |
Kang, M., & Gretzel, U. (2012). Effects of podcast tours on tourist experiences in a national park. Tourism Management, 33(2), 440-455.
DOI
|
14 |
Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85-119.
|
15 |
Lee, C., & Shea, M. (2020). Exploring the use of virtual reality by preservice elementary teachers for teaching science in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 163-177.
DOI
|
16 |
Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1141-1164.
DOI
|
17 |
McCabe, S., & Johnson, S. (2013). The happiness factor in tourism: Subjective well-being and social tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 41, 42-65.
DOI
|
18 |
Orion, N. (1989). Development of a high school geology course based on field trips. Journal of Geological Education, 37, 13-17.
DOI
|
19 |
Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(6), 325-331.
DOI
|
20 |
Zhao, J., Sensibaugh, T., Bodenheimer, B., McNamara, T., Nazareth, A., Newcombe, N., & Klippel, A. (2020). Desktop versus immersive virtual environments: Effects on spatial learning. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 20(4), 328-363.
DOI
|
21 |
Han, I. (2020). Immersive virtual field trips in education: A mixed-methods study on elementary students' presence and perceived learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 420-435.
DOI
|
22 |
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097-1119.
DOI
|
23 |
Puhek, M., Perse, M., Perse, T., & Sorgo, A. (2013). Perceived usability of information and communication technology and acceptance of virtual field trips by lower secondary students, undergraduate students and in-service teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(6), 803-812.
DOI
|
24 |
Cheng, K., & Tsai, C. (2019). A case study of immersive virtual field trips in an elementary classroom: Students' learning experience and teacher-student interaction behaviors. Computers & Education, 140, 103600.
DOI
|
25 |
Dolphin, G., Dutchak, A., Karchewski, B., & Cooper, J. (2019). Virtual field experiences in introductory geology: Addressing a capacity problem, but finding a pedagogical one. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 114-130.
DOI
|
26 |
Fung, F., Choo, W., Ardisara, A., Zimmermann, C., Watts, S., Koscielniak, T., Blanc, E., Coumoul, X., & Dumke, R. (2019). Applying a virtual reality platform in environmental chemistry education to conduct a field trip to an overseas site. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 382-386.
DOI
|
27 |
Rahimi, A., Golshan, N., & Mohebi, H. (2014). Virtual reality as a learning environment in Iranian EFL context: Personal, technical, and pedagogical. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 234-239.
DOI
|
28 |
Seifan, M., Dada, O., & Berenjian, A. (2020). The effect of real and virtual construction field trips on students' perception and career aspiration. Sustainability, 12(3), 1200.
DOI
|
29 |
윤마병(2019). 3D 파노라마 가상현실 만들기를 통한 학성리 맨삽지 야외학습장 융합교육 프로그램 개발. 현장과학교육, 13(3), 339-358.
DOI
|
30 |
김건우, 이기영(2011). 플래시 파노라마를 활용한 웹-기반 가상야외지질답사 개발 및 활용 방안 탐색: 제주도 화산 지형을 중심으로. 한국지구과학회지, 32(2), 212-224.
DOI
|
31 |
최윤성, 김찬종, 최승언(2018). 야외지질학습에 대한 예비 중등 지구과학 교사의 인식 탐색. 한국지구과학회지, 39(3), 291-302.
DOI
|
32 |
허준혁, 이기영(2013). 고등학교 지구과학 수업에서 플래 시 파노라마 기반 가상 야외 답사의 활용이 학생들의 공간 시각화 능력 및 화산 개념 이해에 미치는 영향. 한국지구과학회지, 34(4), 345-355.
DOI
|
33 |
김희수(2014). 3D 파노라마 가상 현실 기술을 이용한 지질 답사 학습 자료의 개발과 적용. 한국지구과학회지, 35(3), 180-191.
DOI
|
34 |
이기영(2013). 플래시 파노라마 기반 가상야외답사의 활용이 중학생의 공간 시각화 능력, 개념 이해와 인식에 미치는 영향. 한국지구과학회지, 34(2), 162-172.
DOI
|
35 |
천종배, 김희수(2018). 실제 야외지질답사와 가상 야외지질답사의 수업 효과 비교. 현장과학교육, 12(3), 331-340.
DOI
|
36 |
Anderson, D., & Lucas, K. (1997). The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 485-495.
DOI
|
37 |
Pham, H., Dao, N., Pedro, A., Le, Q., Hussain, R., Cho, S., & Park, C. (2018). Virtual field trip for mobile construction safety education using 360-degree panoramic virtual reality. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 1174-1191.
|
38 |
Cheng, K. (2019). Parents' user experiences of augmented reality book reading: Perceptions, expectations, and intentions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 303-315.
DOI
|
39 |
Farber, M., & Hall, T. (2007). Emotion and environment: Visitors' extraordinary experiences along the Dalton highway in Alaska. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(2), 248-270.
DOI
|
40 |
Boeve-de Pauw, J., Van Hoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Effective field trips in nature: The interplay between novelty and learning. Journal of Biological Education, 53(1), 21-33.
DOI
|
41 |
Tsai, C. (2009). Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: The differences revealed by college students. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1092-1103.
DOI
|
42 |
Hurd, D. (1997). Novelty and it's relation to field trips. Education, 118(1), 29-36.
|
43 |
Mathews, S., Andrews, L., & Luck, E. (2012). Developing a second life virtual field trip for university students: An action research approach. Educational Research, 54(1), 17-38.
DOI
|