Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2022.15.1.16

What do Elementary Pre-service Teachers Pay Attention to When Designing Science Lessons: Perspectives on Designing Science Lessons by Pre-service Teachers  

Kim, Seongun (Korea National University of Education)
Lim, Sungman (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education / v.15, no.1, 2022 , pp. 16-26 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was to investigate what pre-service teachers pay attention to when designing science lessons. As a result of analyzing the responses of pre-service teachers, it is analyzed that pre-service teachers are designing science lessons with emphasis on science inquiry, considering students' interest, level, and treatment of misconceptions, and closely related to daily life. In particular, it was found that elementary school pre-service teachers made a lot of comments on science class design that emphasizes experimentation and inquiry, so it was found that emphasizing inquiry was recognized as an important point in science lesson design. It is very positive that pre-service teachers recognize important aspects of science education, such as emphasizing inquiry. In addition, it is suggested that the opportunities for class design and demonstration through collaboration with teachers and colleagues should be increased for pre-service teachers' professional development of teachers.
Keywords
science education; pre-service teacher; designing science lesson; teacher education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 권치순, 최은선(2009). 초등학교 과학 실험에서의 안전사고 최소화 방안. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 2(1), 13-22.
2 Leonard, J., Barnes-Johnson, J., Dantley, S. J., & Kimber, C. (2011). Teaching science inquiry in urban contexts: The role of elementary preservice teachers' beliefs. The Urban Review, 43, 124-150.   DOI
3 Manz, E. (2015). Resistance and the development of scientific practice: Designing the mangle into science instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 33(2), 89-124.   DOI
4 National Research Council(NRC). (2000). Inquiry and national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5 National Science Teachers Association(NSTA). (2007). NSTA position statement. The Integral Role of Laboratory Investigations in Science Instruction. Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx
6 서혜애(2010). 과학.수학교사 생애주기 연수체제 구축을 위한 연구. 한국과학창의재단.
7 Allan, E., Shane, J., Brownstein, E. M., Ezrailson, C., Hagevik, R., & Veal, W. (2009). Using performance-based assessments to prepare safe science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 495-500.   DOI
8 박원미(2020). 지구과학 예비교사가 설계한 수업내용의 논증구조에 나타난 반박 분석. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 13(3), 238-252.   DOI
9 양희선, 김현섭(2017). 중학교 과학 수업에서 피드백 기반 실험수업 모형의 적용 효과. 현장과학교육, 11(2), 246-259.   DOI
10 이선경, 오필석, 김혜리, 이경호, 김찬종, 김희백(2009). 과학 교사의 교수내용지식과 실천적 지식에 관한 연구 관점 고찰. 한국교원교육연구, 26(1), 27-57.   DOI
11 권혁순, 최은규, 노태희(2004). 화학 교육에서 사용되는 비유에 대한 학생들의 이해도 및 비유 사용의 제한점. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 287-297.
12 곽한영(2006). 실용지능의 개념이 예비교사 교육과정 개선에 갖는 함의에 대한 연구. 시인교육연구, 38(1), 1-18.
13 교육부(2015). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 9].
14 권치순, 허명, 양일호, 김영신(2004). 초중고 학생들의 과학태도 변화에 대한 학습환경의 원인 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), 1256-1271.
15 박준형, 나지연, 정용재, 송진웅(2015). 초등학생들이 생각하는 과학수업의 특징: 과학수업 문화 분석틀 개발을 위한 기초 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 35(3), 499-508.   DOI
16 이준기, 신세인, 하민수(2015). 중등학생들의 과학과 생물에서의 '실험'의 의미에 대한 인식구조 비교. 한국과학교육학회지, 35(6), 997-1006.   DOI
17 Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.   DOI
18 전경문(2015). 과학 탐구 지도에 대한 초등학교 교사들의 인식 조사. 과학교육연구지, 39(2), 267-277.   DOI
19 이미경, 김경희(2004). 과학에 대한 태도와 과학 성취도의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 399-407.
20 이은주, 손연아(2013). 중등과학교사의 통합과학 수업설계 과정에 대한 사례분석 및 컨설팅-통합과학 5단계 수업계획서 설계를 중심으로-. 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), 208-227.   DOI
21 정용재, 천은겸(2014). 국내 "실행공동체" 관련 연구 동향 분석-초등 과학교육 연구에 주는 시사점을 중심으로-. 초등과학교육, 33(3), 464-478.
22 Bhattacharyya, S., Volk, T., & Lumpe, A. (2009). The influence of an extensive inquiry-based field experience on pre-service elementary student teachers' science teaching beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 199-218.   DOI
23 Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
24 Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
25 Gagne', M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.   DOI
26 엄미리, 엄준용(2009). 교육실습 전후 예비교사의 역량 변화 연구. 한국교원교육연구, 26(3), 491-508.   DOI
27 Galison, P. (1997). Three laboratories. Social Research, 64(3), 1127-1155.
28 Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
29 Hurd, P. D. (1983). Science education: The search for new vision. Educational Leadership, 41, 20-22.
30 Brophy, J. E. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In H. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm (pp. 43-56). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
31 Martin-Dunlop, C. S. (2012). Prospective elementary teachers' understanding of the nature of science and perceptions of the classroom learning environment. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 873-893.   DOI
32 Sardo-Brown, D. (1990). Experienced teachers' planning practices: A US survey. Journal of Educational for Teaching, 16(1), 57-71.   DOI
33 Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In S. Magnusson, J. Krajcik, & H. Borko (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: PCK and science education (pp. 95-132). Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
34 임성만(2017). 지구과학 예비교사들은'수업'에서 무엇을 보는가?-예비교사들의 수업 경험과 비평을 통해서-. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 10(2), 199-213.   DOI
35 하희수, 강은희, 김희백(2020). 탐구 수업 설계 강좌에서 예비 중등 과학 교사의 위치짓기와 인식적 이해 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 40(3), 307-320.   DOI
36 Colaizzi, P. E. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology. New york: Oxford University Press.
37 Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, & G. F. Madsus (Eds.), Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38 Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS). (2013). Retrieved May 15, 2015 from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
39 Silber, K. H. (2007). A principle-based model of instructional design: A new way of thinking about and teaching ID. Educational Technology, 5-19.
40 Taylor, A. R., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists' and teachers' perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058-1075.   DOI
41 Young, A. C., Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1998). Dosuperior teachers employ systematic instructional planning procedures? A descriptive study. ETR&D, 46, 65-78.   DOI
42 Yager, R. E. (1986). To Sts an sets course in K-12 settings. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 6, 276-281.   DOI
43 Steele, A., Brew, C., Rees, C., & Ibrahim-Khan, S. (2013). Our practice, their readiness: Teacher educators collaborate to explore and improve preservice teacher readiness for science and math instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 111-131.   DOI
44 Stoffels, N. T. (2005). "There is a worksheet to be followed": A case study of a science teacher's use of learning support texts for practical work. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9, 147-157.   DOI
45 Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673-695.   DOI
46 Young, M. J., Brett, B., Squires, S., & Lemire, N. (1995). Symposium: A new observation tool for looking at inquiry-based teaching and learning. American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting in San Francisco, April 1995.