1 |
Buck, L. B., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2008). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(1), 52-58.
|
2 |
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738-797.
DOI
|
3 |
Cunningham, C. M. (2017). Engineering in elementary STEM education: Curriculum design, instruction, learning, and assessment. Teachers College Press.
|
4 |
Fortus, D., Krajcik, J., Dershimer, R. C., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Design-based science and real-world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 855-879.
DOI
|
5 |
Guzey, S. S., Tank, K., Wang, H. H., Roehrig, G., & Moore, T. (2014). A high quality professional development for teachers of grades 3-6 for implementing engineering into classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 139-149.
DOI
|
6 |
Hutchinson, J., & Karsnitz, J. (1993). Design and problem solving in technology. New York, United States: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub.
|
7 |
Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Carberry, A., & Hammer, D. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school STEM courses. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/165.
|
8 |
Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.
DOI
|
9 |
Kelly, A. E. (2008). Engineering and design research: Intersections for education research and design. In Hjalmarson, M., Lesh, R., & Baek, J. (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching, pp. 96-110. New York: Routledge.
|
10 |
Kennedy, T., & Odell, M. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
|
11 |
MDE(Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) (2016). 2016 massachusetts science and Technology/Engineering curriculum framework. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/2016-04.pdf.
|
12 |
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research(J-PEER), 4(1), 2.
|
13 |
Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Kersten, J. A. (2015). NGSS and the landscape of engineering in K-12 state science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 296-318.
DOI
|
14 |
Moss, E., & Cervato, C. (2016). Quantifying the level of inquiry in a reformed introductory geology lab course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(2), 125-137.
DOI
|
15 |
Nam, Y. K., Lee, S. J., & Paik, S. H. (2016). The impact of Engineering Integrated Science(EIS) curricula on firstyear technical high school students' attitudes toward science and perception of engineering. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12, 1881-1907.
|
16 |
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
|
17 |
National Research Council (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
|
18 |
National Research Council (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education? Washington DC: National Academies Press.
|
19 |
National Research Council (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
|
20 |
Roehrig, H. (2017). A curricular framework for integrated STEM. In: Science and engineering integrated STEM education. Workshop conducted at the Pusan National University, Pusan, South Korea.
|
21 |
Roehrig, H. H., Moore, T. J., Wang, H. H., & Park, M. S. (2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 engineering standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44.
DOI
|
22 |
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137-1136.
DOI
|
23 |
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.
|
24 |
심재호, 이양락, 김현경(2015). STEM, STEAM 교육과 우리나라 융합인재교육의 이해와 해결 과제. 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), 709-723.
DOI
|
25 |
강주원, 남윤경(2016). 융합인재교육(STEAM)을 위한 창의적 공학문제해결 성향 검사 도구 개발. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 9(3), 276-290.
DOI
|
26 |
교육부(2018). 초등학교 5-6학년군 과학 교사용지도서. 경기: 단국대학교 국정도서편찬위원회.
|
27 |
김영민, 김현정, 허혜연, 이창훈, 김기수(2013). 초.중등 교육에서의 공학교육 프로그램 개발: 중학교 건설공학분야를 중심으로. 한국기술교육학회지, 13(2), 21-41.
|
28 |
윤진아, 한금주, 남윤경(2019). Model Eliciting Activity(MEA)를 통한 초등 과학영재들의 문제해결 특성 분석. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 12(1), 64-81.
DOI
|
29 |
이동영, 남윤경(2018). 공학설계 측면에서 한국 STEAM 프로그램 분석틀 제안. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 11(1), 63-77.
DOI
|
30 |
이정민, 신영준(2014). 융합인재교육 (STEAM) 수업에서 초등교사들이 겪는 어려움 분석. 초등과학교육, 33(3), 588-596.
|
31 |
이진숙, 김은주(2019). 융합인재교육 실행의 문제점과 개선방안에 대한 초등교사의 인식. 초등교육연구, 32(3), 327-355.
|
32 |
이효진, 남윤경(2019). '빛'과 '소리'교육을 위한 공학 설계 기반의 과학.공학 융합프로그램 개발 및 적용. 현장과학교육, 13(3), 211-224.
DOI
|
33 |
임유나(2012). 통합 교육과정에 근거한 융합인재교육(STEAM)의 문제점과 개선 방향. 초등교육연구, 25(4), 53-80.
|